AssimilatorI guess all those guys who have been waiting months for a new driver to fix games that don't work should just keep waiting, huh. I mean it's not like anyone buys a graphics card to play games with, they just like multi-hundred-dollar paperweights.

MusselsWheres the nvidia people hating on AMD's slow drivers now?

Critical bug in a beta = fast fix.


edit: oh wait, assimilator is already here. gotta love those cherry picked arguments that serve absolutely zero purpose except to justify his personal stance on video card preferences.

AssimilatorWould you like a cookie for your weak trolling, mister "GTX 970 has 3.5GB memory"?

Resources
Dont's

• Don’t rely on being able to allocate all GPU memory in one go
  • Depending on the underlying GPU architecture the memory may or may not be segmented

AssimilatorA YouTube video of a guy with graphical corruption and a picture of a burned-out PC proves... what, exactly?

Musselsi officialy request links to the story of that burned up system, because daaaaaaayumn.

Musselspolitely trolling is still trolling.

Aquinus"You can frost a dog turd but, it's still a dog turd."
--
On topic: The 15.9 drivers work fine for me. Probably because I don't use Firefox. In fact, it's not even installed right now. Problem solved. :)

BytalesIve had in Diablo 3 moments where the fps drops to slideshow, 3 4 fps, didnt knew what the hell was happening, turned out the gpus usage dropped at 0, and the game needed reastarted.

Probably that was the memory leak thingy that was suppose to be leaked.
Settings 4k, all max, Radeon Fury X. and 24 Core CPU.

AquinusIf I've told people once, I've told people 1000 times. Expensive server CPUs aren't usually a good option for gaming. Gaming likes clocks, not cores. :shadedshu:

Musselssee it way too often. might change with DX12, but even then some threads are gunna be limited long before the others are used.

AquinusRight, DX12 simply improves rendering performance. It does nothing for the game logic itself. A game very well might have 40 to 80 threads, the problem is that they have to wait on each other for data because you can't do everything in parallel at once. DX doesn't solve the problem of making the rest of the game efficiently multi-threaded, it just makes it so rendering isn't the bottleneck.

If someone seriously has thousands of dollars to throw at a Xeon without knowing anything about what they're doing, then they deserve what they're getting. Stuff like this pisses me off because it's an example of someone simply assuming that more money means more performance and spending thousands on a single CPU... It just rubs me the wrong way and makes me want to kick something. The sad thing, is the cost of the CPU probably could have paid for the entire gaming machine and a second GPU.

RCoonAMD sucks.

Unfortunately, so does NVidia.

Matrox is the best! Outputs to 8 displays. Where is your God now?

DeOdViewand Matrox is using AMD...

RCoonCome on now, the edit button isn't hard to use.

That, and satire evidently goes way above you head.

DeOdViewwhy all the hate. Free yourself, you'll feel much better.

truth tellerhow does that that have anything to do with this _beta_ driver? are you expecting amd to test all product configurations for a beta release?

at least amd beta releases never break cards like nvidias whql sometimes do

www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRo-1VFMcbc

you got any retort on that mr knowitall?