Monday, March 7th 2016

NVIDIA Releases first WHQL-signed GeForce Driver with Vulkan Support

NVIDIA beat AMD to being the first with a WHQL-signed graphics driver Vulkan API support. The new GeForce 364.47 WHQL drivers include support for the new low-overhead API that gives game developers greater access to hardware features, and saps lower CPU overhead. The drivers are also game-ready for "Tom Clancy's The Division," the 2016 reboots of "Hitman," and "Need for Speed," and "Ashes of the Singularity." Grab the drivers from the links below.
DOWNLOAD: NVIDIA GeForce 364.47 WHQL for Windows 10 64-bit | Windows 10 32-bit | Windows 8/7/Vista 64-bit | Windows 8/7/Vista 32-bit
Add your own comment

67 Comments on NVIDIA Releases first WHQL-signed GeForce Driver with Vulkan Support

#51
Xzibit
Remember Nvidia has said 90% of their users upgrade their drivers through GeForce Experience.
Posted on Reply
#53
john_
Last year TechPowerUp published an ULTRA BIASED editorial about AMD not releasing enough WHQL drivers.

I am expecting in the next days to read a FAIR editorial about the WHQL stamp and Nvidia WHQL drivers.

Does this stamp really means better drivers? More stable drivers? or is Nvidia using this stamp for marketing reasons, knowing that they will just have to pay Microsoft to get it. Because these problems are so obvious that I wonder if Microsoft is just selling away that stamp and does no testing at all, before giving it.

Last years editorial about AMD's driver releases, was escalated from the tech press to a discussion about AMD's future. At the same time Nvidia followed with even more frequent driver releases trying to take advantege of all this fuss. Maybe it is a coincidence, but it is obvious that Nvidia is sacrificing driver stability here for marketing reasons.
Posted on Reply
#54
the54thvoid
Intoxicated Moderator
john_Last year TechPowerUp published an ULTRA BIASED editorial about AMD not releasing enough WHQL drivers.

I am expecting in the next days to read a FAIR editorial about the WHQL stamp and Nvidia WHQL drivers.

Does this stamp really means better drivers? More stable drivers? or is Nvidia using this stamp for marketing reasons, knowing that they will just have to pay Microsoft to get it. Because these problems are so obvious that I wonder if Microsoft is just selling away that stamp and does no testing at all, before giving it.

Last years editorial about AMD's driver releases, was escalated from the tech press to a discussion about AMD's future. At the same time Nvidia followed with even more frequent driver releases trying to take advantege of all this fuss. Maybe it is a coincidence, but it is obvious that Nvidia is sacrificing driver stability here for marketing reasons.
Here's a fair story.

The world is full of truly appalling acts of inhumanity and degradation. From religious war to child prostitution, from corruption to mass capitalism and failed states.

People cry over their cornflakes about fucking driver releases. They're not essential - the games actually still work. Tonnes of folks aren't using Crimson because they don't work and lots of folk don't update their NV drivers because the branch from months ago still works.

NEWSFLASH - Bad driver gets released - people read about it and still install it. Duh. Wait for fix (and next fix).

If you want a moral crusade about something worthwhile - go petition your government to do something meaningful. Bitching about your butt hurt feelings because of a bad editorial last year is just weak. Everyone makes mistakes - even TPU. Let it go.
Posted on Reply
#55
john_
the54thvoidHere's a fair story.

The world is full of truly appalling acts of inhumanity and degradation. From religious war to child prostitution, from corruption to mass capitalism and failed states.

People cry over their cornflakes about fucking driver releases. They're not essential - the games actually still work. Tonnes of folks aren't using Crimson because they don't work and lots of folk don't update their NV drivers because the branch from months ago still works.

NEWSFLASH - Bad driver gets released - people read about it and still install it. Duh. Wait for fix (and next fix).

If you want a moral crusade about something worthwhile - go petition your government to do something meaningful. Bitching about your butt hurt feelings because of a bad editorial last year is just weak. Everyone makes mistakes - even TPU. Let it go.
Congrats and thank you. You opened my eyes.

Posted on Reply
#56
EarthDog
john_Last year TechPowerUp published an ULTRA BIASED editorial about AMD not releasing enough WHQL drivers.

I am expecting in the next days to read a FAIR editorial about the WHQL stamp and Nvidia WHQL drivers.

Does this stamp really means better drivers? More stable drivers? or is Nvidia using this stamp for marketing reasons, knowing that they will just have to pay Microsoft to get it. Because these problems are so obvious that I wonder if Microsoft is just selling away that stamp and does no testing at all, before giving it.

Last years editorial about AMD's driver releases, was escalated from the tech press to a discussion about AMD's future. At the same time Nvidia followed with even more frequent driver releases trying to take advantege of all this fuss. Maybe it is a coincidence, but it is obvious that Nvidia is sacrificing driver stability here for marketing reasons.
do you know what is required for WHQL certification?

Here is a good read for you (hint - it has nothing to do with nvidia or amd paying anyone:msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff553976(v=vs.85).aspx
Posted on Reply
#57
Breit
EarthDogdo you know what is required for WHQL certification?
Money? :ohwell:
Posted on Reply
#58
THU31
Poor AMD, they have no money to pay for WHQL drivers, and they have no money to bribe developers to gimp their games on NVIDIA cards. What a brutal world.
Posted on Reply
#59
EarthDog
Wow...Make sure you are wearing tinfoil hats for your protection...

Perhaps if AMD got their collective heads out of their asses, focused less on marketing hype and more on the substance of their hardware, they wouldn't be in this position. ;)
Posted on Reply
#60
john_
EarthDogWow...Make sure you are wearing tinfoil hats for your protection...

Perhaps if AMD got their collective heads out of their asses, focused less on marketing hype and more on the substance of their hardware, they wouldn't be in this position. ;)
On other news, Nvidia that doesn't have their collective heads in their asses, they are more focused on drivers and less in marketing hype(LOL?), It looks like they have rolled back to 362.00 being the default driver version. : nvidia
Posted on Reply
#61
EarthDog
Hey john_.... shit happens. Nothing is perfect bud. I recall some driver debacles out of BOTH camps in the past. At least with NVIDIA it isn't a reoccurring theme that threatens their existence as a company as is the marketing but no substance that AMD has become, the head up their ass.. ;)
Posted on Reply
#63
john_
EarthDogHey john_.... shit happens. Nothing is perfect bud. I recall some driver debacles out of BOTH camps in the past. At least with NVIDIA it isn't a reoccurring theme that threatens their existence as a company as is the marketing but no substance that AMD has become, the head up their ass.. ;)
Nvidia mistake. Shit happens. Anyone objecting to that, wear your tinfoil hats.
AMD mistake. Do I have to comment?
Posted on Reply
#64
EarthDog
john_Nvidia mistake. Shit happens. Anyone objecting to that, wear your tinfoil hats.
AMD mistake. Do I have to comment?
I can't speak for the rest of the lemmings here... but for myself, if this happened to AMD, yes, "shit happens" would still be my response. One can't test for every single setup! Again, I am not absolving them of this issue, but people jumped into conclusions that were a pretty far reach from what most would consider probable or reality.

If you took notice, my 'tin foil hat' statement was in reference to Harry Lloyd's post which talked about bribery for WHQL status (and breit for saying "money" - but his post wasn't directly above mine...should have quoted it). ;)

EDIT:
Microsoft no longer requires a WHQL testing fee,
[4] which used to be USD $250 per operating system family.[5] This fee covers both 32-bit (x86) and 64-bit (x64) versions, if submitted simultaneously, and is non-refundable. The fee does not include other expenses, such as a Windows Server 2008 x64 license, necessary for running WHQL tests, and a VeriSign certificate, necessary for submitting test results.[6]
Posted on Reply
#66
Breit
EarthDogand breit for saying "money"
That wasn't exactly serious. I though you've guessed that. :)
But obviously thorough testing couldn't either be a requirement for a WHQL label. Otherwise this fairly obvious bug would've been discovered.
Posted on Reply
#67
sammy
What are those images about, are those graphics produced by drivers specially the car one.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Aug 24th, 2024 14:46 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts