Tuesday, April 19th 2016
NVIDIA to Launch Mid-range GP106 Based Graphics Cards in Autumn 2016
NVIDIA is expected to launch the first consumer graphics cards based on the GP106 silicon some time in Autumn 2016 (late Q3-early Q4). Based on the company's next-generation "Pascal" architecture, the GP106 will drive several key mid-range and performance-segment (price/performance sweetspot) SKUs, including the cards that succeed the current GeForce GTX 960 and GTX 950. Based on the way NVIDIA's big GP100 silicon is structured, assuming the GP106 features two graphics processing clusters (GPCs), the way the current GM206 silicon does; one can expect a CUDA core count in the neighborhood of 1,280. NVIDIA could use this chip to capture several key sub-$250 price points.
Source:
SweClockers
55 Comments on NVIDIA to Launch Mid-range GP106 Based Graphics Cards in Autumn 2016
It's easy to it's a niche market, which it is. Still if you have one or more 4K UHD TVs then it's not so easily dismissed that AMD kept recycling their parts so much that the lack of HDMI 2.0 became just one of the omissions that gave away its considerable vintage.
And your right, since there really aren't any single cards that can perform really well at 4K resolution what does it matter!?!
and if that is your argument the fury x and 980 ti/titan are all 1080P cards because they are all within 3-5FPS of the 390/390x
Id also happily run the 290x/390x/980 at 1440p... They are????!!!!!!
980 Ti/Titan X is like 20%+ faster than a 980 and the 980 is a few % faster than a 390x...
www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_Fury_X/31.html
I would also prefer to use a little newer of a review that has newer drivers.
This is one of the most recent reviews w1z has done.
www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Gigabyte/GTX_980_Ti_XtremeGaming/1.html Can you see the difference and in what specific game?
Reflect on Nvidia should be able to deliver such 950/960 at much better prices, given there die area being 38% smaller than Tonga, 128-Bit, and their sales volume's. I suppose they don't want to show their hand as that would pervert this next GP106 being justified as a $220-250 part. For this next generation great 1440p performance is requisite from a $200 card!
@bug manufacturers offer 100Hz(+) monitors because people are willing to buy them.
So unless we've all become doctors, delving into this topic is a waste of time.
This might play a bit in the timing of why we get "entry-level" graphics before high-end ones. Its easier for these companies to have "stable" solutions on a smaller scale, and not all of it has to do with silicon stuff. Higher-end graphics have to do specific tasks at specific FPS, with monitors of a specific resolution, and a specific refresh.
I, for one, am not a FPS junkie. But when trying to tune Witcher3, it felt stuttery with enough detail enabled. When I looked at the FPS count, it was usually in the mid 40s.
Another aspect is that if the panel can do more than 60Hz, you get the luxury of enabling ULMB, for example.