Wednesday, May 25th 2016

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti to be Based on GP102 Silicon

It looks like NVIDIA will have not one, but two "big chips" based on the "Pascal" architecture. The first one of course is the GP100, which made its debut with the Tesla P100 HPC processor. The GP100 is an expensive chip at the outset, featuring a combination of FP32 (single-precision) and FP64 (double-precision) CUDA cores, running up to 3,840 SPFP and 1,920 DPFP, working out to a gargantuan 5,760 CUDA core count. FP64 CUDA cores are practically useless on the consumer-graphics space, particularly in the hands of gamers. The GP100 also features a swanky 4096-bit HBM2 memory interface, with stacked memory dies sitting on the GPU package, making up an expensive multi-chip module. NVIDIA also doesn't want its product development cycle to be held hostage by HBM2 market availability and yields.

NVIDIA hence thinks there's room for a middle-ground between the super-complex GP100, and the rather simple GP104, if a price-war with AMD should make it impossible to sell a GP100-based SKU at $650-ish. Enter the GP102. This ASIC will be targeted at consumer graphics, making up GeForce GTX products, including the GTX 1080 Ti. It is cost-effective, in that it does away with the FP64 CUDA cores found on the GP100, retaining just a 3,840 FP32 CUDA cores count, 33% higher than that of the GP104, just as the GM200 had 33% more CUDA cores than the GM204.

It could also not be improbable that NVIDIA could use the more readily available GDDR5X memory interface on this chip. It remains to be seen if the GTX 1080 Ti features all 3,840 CUDA cores present on this chip, or if some are disabled to improve yields. It will also be interesting to see on what chip (the GP100 or GP102) the next GTX TITAN SKU will be based on.
Source: WCCFTech
Add your own comment

57 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti to be Based on GP102 Silicon

#51
Caring1
NihilusMaybe it has something to do with the fees and taxes the corporations need to pay the Socialist Eutopias of Europe.
And Canada, Asia, Australia...oh let's just say everywhere that's not America!
Posted on Reply
#52
Caring1
btarunrThe tax-regime is more to blame. Hardware prices shot up by 20% over the last two years, and it has not just to do with USD-INR rates. Prices will come down significantly if GST bill is passed.
:roll::roll::roll::roll:
Thanks for that laugh.
Here in Australia when GST was implemented nothing changed, oh except prices went up....
Posted on Reply
#54
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
Caring1:roll::roll::roll::roll:
Thanks for that laugh.
Here in Australia when GST was implemented nothing changed, oh except prices went up....
States out-tax the centre with electronics. I'm not sure if Indian GST bill is the same as OZ's. Indian Parliament is structured similar to Westminster, the lower-house (of the people) already passed the bill, as it lowers and regularizes retail prices greatly. The posh cunts of the upper house are holding it back, as they represent the states, and states stand to lose a lot of direct revenue from this.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goods_and_Services_Tax_Bill
Amalgamating several Central and State taxes into a single tax would mitigate cascading or double taxation, facilitating a common national market. The simplicity of the tax should lead to easier administration and enforcement. From the consumer point of view, the biggest advantage would be in terms of a reduction in the overall tax burden on goods, which is currently estimated at 25%-30%
Posted on Reply
#55
Chaitanya
btarunrThe tax-regime is more to blame. Hardware prices shot up by 20% over the last two years, and it has not just to do with USD-INR rates. Prices will come down significantly if GST bill is passed.
I know about stupid tax regime, I have keep track of a lot of taxes while selling to clients. Hopefully GST will be passed by years end, it will simplify things for me as well a lot.
Posted on Reply
#56
bug
RockarolaPlease keep to issues you know something about (whatever that may be)
You'll just have to register your business as an EU Only Export Company and your local Tax Office will do the rest...it's actually easier than covering all of the US. (been there, done that...you won't even get a T-shirt)
EU is not all Schengen, so it's not that easy to cover all states. Plus, there's at least the accountancy that needs to be kept separately for each country.
Posted on Reply
#57
Rockarola
bugEU is not all Schengen, so it's not that easy to cover all states. Plus, there's at least the accountancy that needs to be kept separately for each country.
Well, the only non-Shengen countries are the UK and Eire, and they are opt-out, not opt-in...the other four are legally bound to follow Schengen, even though they are not members. For the accounting, it's just a matter of keeping good records (sorry about my previous comment, I was feeling grumpy and you were first in line )
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 11th, 2025 05:01 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts