Thursday, June 16th 2016
NVIDIA Cuts Prices of GTX 980 Ti, GTX 980, and GTX 970
In the wake of its GeForce GTX 1080 and GTX 1070 graphics card launches, NVIDIA decided to cut prices of its previous-generation GeForce GTX 980 Ti, GeForce GTX 980, and GeForce GTX 970 graphics cards, in a bid to clear inventories. The $379 and 150W GTX 1070 is faster than the GTX 980 Ti and the GTX Titan X, rendering them obsolete. The price of the $620 GTX 980 Ti has been cut by $125, and is now down to $495~499. The GTX 980, on the other hand, sees its price cut by $75, bringing its price down from $399 to $324, less than the launch-price of the GTX 970. The smash-hit GTX 970, at the dusk of its market life, sees its price cut by $25, bringing it down from $289 to $265.
Source:
VideoCardz
52 Comments on NVIDIA Cuts Prices of GTX 980 Ti, GTX 980, and GTX 970
You want to clear inventories? You're going to have to beat the price slashes you just did, NVIDIA.
Unlesss of course, this 10xx shortage is going to be long lived, in which case, I guess this lackluster "slash" is smart from a business perspective... but kinda scummy.
trog
MSI Golden Edition: $399. MSI Gaming LE (basically just not overclocked for you): $439. Zotac AmP! Edition: $479. So, it's filtering down.
www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127912&cm_sp=VRCentral-_-product-_-vga-_-na&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-_-na-_-na-_-na&AID=11552995&PID=2012219&SID=
JESUS! @ thats the 2nd tkme you ninja me regarding the 360 980ti @Fluffmeister;)
I guess I'll just wait for AMDs launch of the RX480 for $199 (or $229 for 8gb) which leaked benchmarks (not ocnfirmed though) say it performe better than OC GTX980.
trog
Only thing, even if the performance is true then there won't be enough for demand and you won't be able to buy one for $199 because everyone and newegg included will increase the price until supplies catch up with demand and that's a big lose for AMD. Nvidia will drop the prices on these cards again and everyone will just buy a GTX9XX. Nvidia plays the game and plays it well.
I'm finding it hard to believe that the 1070 is faster than the 980ti, especially as it is the same architecture but shrunk and running faster, the 1070 is cut down version of the 1080 so less cuda cores. I'm not arguing, I'm not saying it isn't, I'm just asking, if in real world gaming scenario is it really faster than the 980ti?
Here is what I see happens with these price drops, which we know Nvidia does not do. 1) there is a large stock of Maxwells still in the supply chain. 2) people are not willing to buy many 1080's at the inflated prices, and to a lesser extent, the 1070's.
3) Sales records quite possibly show people are still buying the 970, 980 and 980Ti in large numbers. 4) Recognizing this Nvidia says "we're not going to sell alot of Pascals until there is no alternative and they HAVE to pay our new, higher prices." Thus:
5) Massive price cuts on Maxwells to eliminate the "competition."
There comes a point you can no longer get any more performance from the hardware. For Kepler, it was March, 2015 with 347.88. That would be the point you and others claim they have "stopped supporting" that hardware. :shadedshu:
I for one am not worried. Maxwells, especially higher-end ones will still be valid for some good amount of time.
I am very happy with the support my 770s have gotten, I've not noticed this "gimping" anywhere. Kepler lasted quite a long time, and they wouldnt be replaced if I had gotten 4GB versions.
Regards,