Thursday, June 23rd 2016
AMD Radeon RX 470 Could Surprise with Pricing
AMD could deal yet another shock to NVIDIA after the Radeon RX 480, with its smaller sibling, the Radeon RX 470. This card is expected to be priced at $149 for the 4 GB variant, and $179 for the 8 GB variant. The card is rumored to feature 2,048 stream processors, spread acrosss 32 compute units, down from the 2,304 stream processors of the RX 480. Its memory ticks slower, at 7 Gbps, with a memory bandwidth of 224 GB/s. The most spectacular specification, however, is its typical board power, which is rated at 110W. The card should be faster than at least the R9 380X, and at its given specs, offer a very interesting option for 1080p gamers, at $149.
Sources:
WCCFTech, VideoCardz
67 Comments on AMD Radeon RX 470 Could Surprise with Pricing
And OCing wasn't that much a trend back then, or was it?
So if it is 70w-ish card, I can see why they go with 6 pin connector.
Still you can sell your old GPU & get two new more power efficient cards. Doesn't that seem to be a good idea? :cool:
How pathetic, GPU manufacturers, how pathetic.
A shame, really.
Fanboyism at its finest.
I wont bother to explain anyways. Let's leave it there.
I have a buddy that works at one of our biggest computer retailers here, and he called me saying: Dude, i got 1080 from work for testing, come, we will have some fun.
10 mints in witcher maxed out on 1080p, and what we get??
Fan boys may or may not cry over this but the results were depresing.
Min FPS: 40s
Avg FPS: 60s
Max FPS: 80s
WTF??? We were like WHAAAAAAAAA???
For a 700€ card, dips to 40s on 1080p???
How are they advertising it to be 4K capable when it barely handles 1080p???
We did the testing with an i7 6700, asus rog board, 16GB ddr4 ram, and is not looking good for nvidia at these performance points.
A 970 that had 3.5GB on Witcher dips to like 35 at max settings at 1080p.
Either way your explanation of the previous comment is exactly what I figured you meant :) The real issue is, AMD blew millions on lots of silicon and transistors, and they were aging on the shelves, so they had to keep them in the market longer and came up with that 3xx refresh after the 2xx refresh. Self fulfilling prophecy for this company. They had to sit it out until 16/14nm because that opens an actual opportunity to make steps to cheaper silicon without a complete architectural overhaul. I mean look at Pascal - it ain't magic. It's just Finfet and another Maxwell.
Seeing between 70% to 100% higher performance over the RX 480 would certainly not be surprising.
I think we could even see three cuts from the same die to maximize yields - or maybe there will be two Vega chips (kinda doubt that, though).