Thursday, June 23rd 2016

AMD Radeon RX 470 Could Surprise with Pricing

AMD could deal yet another shock to NVIDIA after the Radeon RX 480, with its smaller sibling, the Radeon RX 470. This card is expected to be priced at $149 for the 4 GB variant, and $179 for the 8 GB variant. The card is rumored to feature 2,048 stream processors, spread acrosss 32 compute units, down from the 2,304 stream processors of the RX 480. Its memory ticks slower, at 7 Gbps, with a memory bandwidth of 224 GB/s. The most spectacular specification, however, is its typical board power, which is rated at 110W. The card should be faster than at least the R9 380X, and at its given specs, offer a very interesting option for 1080p gamers, at $149.
Sources: WCCFTech, VideoCardz
Add your own comment

67 Comments on AMD Radeon RX 470 Could Surprise with Pricing

#51
medi01
james888A 750ti has a typical board power of 70w and does not need power supply input. The 470 will have 110w typical board power and will need at least a 6pin of power supply input.
AMD tends not to draw full 75W from PCI-e.
And OCing wasn't that much a trend back then, or was it?

So if it is 70w-ish card, I can see why they go with 6 pin connector.
Posted on Reply
#52
Divide Overflow
Prima.VeraMan screw this, when are the big boys coming????????
Vega. Early next year or towards the end of this one if you believe [Rumors].
Posted on Reply
#53
BoyGenius
medi01Why not? They support "kinda cross fire" with APUs GPU + discrete.
With APUs the GCN core count changes not the generations so they kind of work in CrossFire. Only if AMD itself support cross generation crossfire it will be possible else probably not.
Still you can sell your old GPU & get two new more power efficient cards. Doesn't that seem to be a good idea? :cool:
Posted on Reply
#54
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
Prima.VeraBy then nVidia would already lunch 1080Ti card who will trash any AMD cards released then. Pathetic AMD.
Both Polaris and especially Vega are unknowns. Impossible to say for sure.
Posted on Reply
#55
medi01
Prima.VeraBy then nVidia would already lunch 1080Ti card who will trash any AMD cards released then. Pathetic AMD.
Top tier card (490/Fury/FuryX 1080/1080Ti/TX) of this gen will trash any current gen low tier card of the competitor (1060/1050 and 460/470/480) .
How pathetic, GPU manufacturers, how pathetic.

A shame, really.
Posted on Reply
#56
ZoneDymo
Prima.VeraBy then nVidia would already lunch 1080Ti card who will trash any AMD cards released then. Pathetic AMD.
Pathetic comment more like it...
Fanboyism at its finest.
Posted on Reply
#57
Prima.Vera
ZoneDymoPathetic comment more like it...
Fanboyism at its finest.
You guys misinterpret what I was trying to say.
I wont bother to explain anyways. Let's leave it there.
Posted on Reply
#58
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
Prima.VeraYou guys misinterpret what I was trying to say.
I wont bother to explain anyways. Let's leave it there.
I thought it was clear. You think 1080ti will crush everything and that AMD is pathetic. Both could well be true, but we just don't know until the time comes. Personally I think this gen will be a repeat of the last generation, but probably not quite as bad.
Posted on Reply
#59
Prima.Vera
FrickI thought it was clear. You think 1080ti will crush everything and that AMD is pathetic. Both could well be true, but we just don't know until the time comes. Personally I think this gen will be a repeat of the last generation, but probably not quite as bad.
Sorry, I meant something like is pathetic from AMD to release those cheap cards with last year performance, and nothing to compete with 1070 or 1080 until end of year or next year. Is pathetic since the nGreedia will keep milking those callous prices until AMD will challenge them with something. IF.
Posted on Reply
#60
Filip Georgievski
They will compete trust me.
I have a buddy that works at one of our biggest computer retailers here, and he called me saying: Dude, i got 1080 from work for testing, come, we will have some fun.
10 mints in witcher maxed out on 1080p, and what we get??
Fan boys may or may not cry over this but the results were depresing.
Min FPS: 40s
Avg FPS: 60s
Max FPS: 80s
WTF??? We were like WHAAAAAAAAA???
For a 700€ card, dips to 40s on 1080p???
How are they advertising it to be 4K capable when it barely handles 1080p???
We did the testing with an i7 6700, asus rog board, 16GB ddr4 ram, and is not looking good for nvidia at these performance points.
A 970 that had 3.5GB on Witcher dips to like 35 at max settings at 1080p.
Posted on Reply
#61
Vayra86
Prima.VeraSorry, I meant something like is pathetic from AMD to release those cheap cards with last year performance, and nothing to compete with 1070 or 1080 until end of year or next year. Is pathetic since the nGreedia will keep milking those callous prices until AMD will challenge them with something. IF.
But... they already let Nvidia cannibalize the high-mid range segment since 2013 so why would this be any different? Nvidia pulled that 970, remember? The last real card AMD had in there was the HD7970, 7950 and the 7870. After that they stopped being serious about that price segment and just kicked Hawaii down into it after its massive launch failure as a high end card with the stock blower @ 95 C, people bought a few only to sell them on... so they moved Tonga in, which didn't do enough of anything to make a difference anywhere. And then came Fury which didn't sell more than twenty units worldwide (I exaggerate, but u get the point). So currently, the segment that was in real dire need gets the treatment first. I mean they were still running low-mid range on fucking Pitcairn and the cards above that just will not sell against their less beefy but also less power hungry Nvidia counterparts. The irony: AMD makes a more expensive piece of hardware, and sells it for less.

Either way your explanation of the previous comment is exactly what I figured you meant :) The real issue is, AMD blew millions on lots of silicon and transistors, and they were aging on the shelves, so they had to keep them in the market longer and came up with that 3xx refresh after the 2xx refresh. Self fulfilling prophecy for this company. They had to sit it out until 16/14nm because that opens an actual opportunity to make steps to cheaper silicon without a complete architectural overhaul. I mean look at Pascal - it ain't magic. It's just Finfet and another Maxwell.
Posted on Reply
#62
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
Prima.VeraSorry, I meant something like is pathetic from AMD to release those cheap cards with last year performance, and nothing to compete with 1070 or 1080 until end of year or next year. Is pathetic since the nGreedia will keep milking those callous prices until AMD will challenge them with something. IF.
Maybe AMD just thought Nvidia would make a midrange card as well. And if the 480 is what its supposed to be at the right price and if they can keep 'em stocked they will sell well.
Posted on Reply
#63
Prima.Vera
Vayra86But... they already let Nvidia cannibalize the high-mid range segment since 2013 so why would this be any different? Nvidia pulled that 970, remember? The last real card AMD had in there was the HD7970, 7950 and the 7870. After that they stopped being serious about that price segment and just kicked Hawaii down into it after its massive launch failure as a high end card with the stock blower @ 95 C, people bought a few only to sell them on... so they moved Tonga in, which didn't do enough of anything to make a difference anywhere. And then came Fury which didn't sell more than twenty units worldwide (I exaggerate, but u get the point). So currently, the segment that was in real dire need gets the treatment first. I mean they were still running low-mid range on fucking Pitcairn and the cards above that just will not sell against their less beefy but also less power hungry Nvidia counterparts. The irony: AMD makes a more expensive piece of hardware, and sells it for less.

Either way your explanation of the previous comment is exactly what I figured you meant :) The real issue is, AMD blew millions on lots of silicon and transistors, and they were aging on the shelves, so they had to keep them in the market longer and came up with that 3xx refresh after the 2xx refresh. Self fulfilling prophecy for this company. They had to sit it out until 16/14nm because that opens an actual opportunity to make steps to cheaper silicon without a complete architectural overhaul. I mean look at Pascal - it ain't magic. It's just Finfet and another Maxwell.
So they are keeping their next Fury for 1080Ti then....
Posted on Reply
#64
looncraz
Prima.VeraSo they are keeping their next Fury for 1080Ti then....
Vega 10 is a supposedly monster chip - nearly double the size of the RX 480. It uses the Fury X floorplan - 4096SPs, HBM2 on interposer, with all of the improvements of Polaris and more, etc...

Seeing between 70% to 100% higher performance over the RX 480 would certainly not be surprising.

I think we could even see three cuts from the same die to maximize yields - or maybe there will be two Vega chips (kinda doubt that, though).
Posted on Reply
#65
TRWOV
When is the 470 launching? I need one for my Steambox
Posted on Reply
#66
bug
TRWOVWhen is the 470 launching? I need one for my Steambox
I don't think anyone has a clue currently.
Posted on Reply
#67
xorbe
TRWOVWhen is the 470 launching? I need one for my Steambox
Get 4gb 480 and down-clock / down-volt ... usually kills the next card down in perf/watt.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 22nd, 2024 07:27 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts