Thursday, July 7th 2016

NVIDIA Announces the GeForce GTX 1060, 6 GB GDDR5, $249

NVIDIA today announced its third desktop consumer graphics card based on the "Pascal" architecture, the GeForce GTX 1060. NVIDIA aims to strike a price-performance sweetspot, by pricing this card aggressively at US $249 (MSRP), with its reference "Founders Edition" variant priced at $299. To make sure two of these cards at $500 don't cannibalize the $599-699 GTX 1080, NVIDIA didn't even give this card 2-way SLI support. Retail availability of the cards will commence from 19th July, 2016. NVIDIA claims that the GTX 1060 performs on-par with the GeForce GTX 980 from the previous generation.

The GeForce GTX 1060 is based on the new 16 nm "GP106" silicon, the company's third ASIC based on this architecture after GP100 and GP104. It features 1,280 CUDA cores spread across ten streaming multiprocessors, 80 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and a 192-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 6 GB of memory. The card draws power from a single 6-pin PCIe power connector, as the GPU's TDP is rated at just 120W. The core is clocked up to 1.70 GHz, and the memory at 8 Gbps, at which it belts out 192 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Display outputs include three DisplayPorts 1.4, one HDMI 2.0b, and a DVI.
Add your own comment

182 Comments on NVIDIA Announces the GeForce GTX 1060, 6 GB GDDR5, $249

#26
the54thvoid
Super Intoxicated Moderator
Require reviews.

SLI isn't a concern for many. Moving forward is a DX12 multi GPU environment with MS recent announcement. Crossfire and SLI will lose relevance once DX12 gets hold. That aside, I guess it's a personal thing - I left dual cards after 5850's, 7970's and finally 780ti's. I know there are plenty of people that would rather pay for a 1070 than 2 of these.

One thing that will draw equal praise an ire is the power draw. If the 1060 is frugal with power it will go into more OEM's because of it. When I had 5850's, the power draw of Fermi was always being laughed at. Now of course, things are very different, power draw isn't relevant.....
Posted on Reply
#27
ZoneDymo
efikkanNow, let's see. GTX 1060 offers:
- Better performance
- Better performance per dollar
- Better efficiency
- Lower power draw
- Possibly higher overclocking headroom.

Which sane person would prefer an RX 480?
well the "performance per dollar" argument is quite up for debate still....
Posted on Reply
#28
alucasa
ZoneDymoWhy would there be a point for the 1070 and not for the 1060?
Buying a single 1080 would be a far better solution than buying two 1060. You should know that since you've been here since 2009.

There is also an argument of buying 2nd 1060 later to SLI but there are issues to that also.
Posted on Reply
#29
ZoneDymo
bugBecause the power you'd get from SLId 1060s is better provided by a single 1080. The power of SLId 1080s has no substitute today.
sure, but I was asking for sli'd 1070, surely with that logic SLI on the 1070 is equally pointless.
Posted on Reply
#30
qisoed
Nice card for those who wants to play high or better in 1920x1080 / 1920x1200.

But I think its good for nvidia to not give SLI feature for 1060, its not just keep their higher product market being taken but also to make the market healthy. So for those who wants multi gpu can run for AMD 480 and those who needs only single gpu can put 1060 on the list
Posted on Reply
#31
GhostRyder
No 3gb edition, well that is a good thing to me because I thought for that performance segment its getting a little on the low end. I am not sure if I am surprised by the fact the Founders Edition is on this card but its seems ridiculous seeing as how the premium nets you less than before since this cooler looks much cheaper than the other two. Not sure about the removal of SLI still on the 1060 cards, seems like something I still see around though I doubt its going to hurt much in the long run.

Meh, guess we will just have to see. Hopefully they AIB's make some of those "Cheaper" plastic blowers available soon for those wanting the cheaper end of the spectrum.
Posted on Reply
#32
bug
ZoneDymosure, but I was asking for sli'd 1070, surely with that logic SLI on the 1070 is equally pointless.
And you can't make the connection with the logic laid down in front of you? Let me spell it out for you (literally): there's no substitute for SLId 1070s either.
Posted on Reply
#33
GC_PaNzerFIN
ZoneDymosure, but I was asking for sli'd 1070, surely with that logic SLI on the 1070 is equally pointless.
2x GTX 1070 should end up faster than GTX 1080 whenever SLi works. There is no single GPU equivalent available = SLI may be acceptable.

There is absolutely no reason to SLi 2x GTX 1060 to do what, end up slower than GTX 1080 unless SLI scaling is 100%?
Posted on Reply
#34
efikkan
ShurikNBased on what?
MSRP of $239 vs $249.
Posted on Reply
#35
ZoneDymo
bugAnd you can't make the connection with the logic laid down in front of you? Let me spell it out for you (literally): there's no substitute for SLId 1070s either.
no but their will be when the GTX1080Ti is out....
Posted on Reply
#36
Fluffmeister
ZoneDymono but their will be when the GTX1080Ti is out....
Well duh, of course. But i suspect the GTX 1170 will beat that for less money.

And the cycle continues.
Posted on Reply
#37
the54thvoid
Super Intoxicated Moderator
ZoneDymono but their will be when the GTX1080Ti is out....
I'm backing you up on the front that sli (and crossfire) is pointless for gaming anyway. It's too much of a lottery to spend several hundred dollars on a card that a game might not support in sli. It's the new lottery and the odds are getting worse each game release. Only dev's adopting multi-gpu in DX12 will alter that slide and that doesn't require a bridge.
Posted on Reply
#38
HD64G
efikkanNow, let's see. GTX 1060 offers:
- Better performance
- Better performance per dollar
- Better efficiency
- Lower power draw
- Possibly higher overclocking headroom.

Which sane person would prefer an RX 480?
Which sane person wouldn't prefer a GPU (RX480) over another (1060) that:
1) Isn't even reviewed yet
2) We don't know its availability when it is to be sold
3) It will be sold $50 over the normal price for weeks
4) It forbids SLI
5) It will be more expensive in its stock form than oced and much better cooled custom RX480s

Only fanboys.

That opinion might change if and when it will be widely available in big quantities for $249 and if proved to be over 10% average (W1z's review %) faster than ref RX480 at 1080P which is the resotution it matters to this sale price lvl buyers more than any other.
Posted on Reply
#39
medi01
efikkanMSRP of $239 vs $249.
Yeah, just like 379$ 1070 has materialized.
ZoneDymowell the "performance per dollar" argument is quite up for debate still....
So, by the way, is "better performance", especially in about 6 month from now.
Posted on Reply
#40
GC_PaNzerFIN
ZoneDymono but their will be when the GTX1080Ti is out....
You can't buy a GTX 1080 Ti, not now and I suspect for a while now.
You absolutely can buy a GTX 1080 now, and when GTX 1060s are available.

See the difference?
Posted on Reply
#41
Prima.Vera
I don't believe that this card will be faster than my 780Ti. I refuse to belive that!
Posted on Reply
#42
chaosmassive
efikkanNow, let's see. GTX 1060 offers:
- Better performance
- Better performance per dollar

- Possibly higher overclocking headroom.

Which sane person would prefer an RX 480?
as I said, GTX 1060 offer better performance over RX 480, but like what? 10%? is this justified for 250?
and there is no way 3rd party card which offer overclocking out of card will set in Nvidia MRSP
thats two points above somehow dont make any sense to Perf/Dollar that you claimed better than RX 480
mind to elaborate your calculation?
Posted on Reply
#43
Fluffmeister
gdallsk

Card without the cooler, it seems that if you take the cooler off, you take the power connector off as well.
Ahhh it's tiny, could well be a margin monster for the green team.
Posted on Reply
#44
GhostRyder
What matters is the performance and its overclocking, that's what people are going to see at the end since you include boost 3.0 and such (Especially with how easy it is to overclock these cards now a days). The people screaming that power consumption is the end all about this card need to buy a Prius or a Leaf and call it a day because that's going to save you more money than the difference in the two cards power wise (RX 480 vs GTX 1060). The only thing that slightly holds it back is the lack of SLI but even then its one of those "Meh" arguments because its a very slim market for people buying two lower end cards instead of one high (Buying a single 1070 would be much more logical) so its only matters to those who buy one now and might want another one down the road instead of replacing the card.

Its going to be a good card, but once we have reviews actually placing it 10% above (If that's where it lands) then we can judge the pricing for ourselves. The dual MSRP thing will hold it back, but I will bet it will get close to the lower MSRP with some of the plastic edition coolers like on the 1070 and 1080.
Posted on Reply
#46
Assimilator
Will be interesting to see how this puppy clocks; 2+ GHz at under 150W total power usage should definitely be doable if GP106 follows in its bigger brothers' steps. GTX 980 performance in a much smaller footprint and much lower power usage is exactly what AMD failed to deliver with RX 480, but this card looks to do it.

I reckon we'll see a 256bit 8GB 1060 Ti sooner or later, considering those empty memory spots. The board's PCB is the shortest I've ever seen, which means cooling might be a problem, but also that some enterprising AIBs might design and release a half-height version. GTX 980 performance in a HTPC, yes please!

I don't think we'll see GTX 1060 at $249 now, but if NVIDIA decide to release a Ti version, it'll be a different story.
Posted on Reply
#47
efikkan
HD64GWhich sane person wouldn't prefer a GPU (RX480) over another (1060) that:
1) Isn't even reveiwed yet
Fair enough, but we got clear indications.
HD64G2) We don't know it's availability when it is to be sold
Availability of RX 480 isn't that great either, especially the custom versions that everyone wants.
HD64G3) It will be sold $50 over the normal price for weeks
So is RX 480.
HD64G4) It forbids SLI
Doesn't matter for this price segment.
HD64G5) It will be more expensive in its stock form than oced and much better cooled custom RX480s
That's not true.
chaosmassiveas I said, GTX 1060 offer better performance over RX 480, but like what? 10%? is this justified for 250?
and there is no way 3rd party card which offer overclocking out of card will set in Nvidia MRSP
thats two points above somehow dont make any sense to Perf/Dollar that you claimed better than RX 480
mind to elaborate your calculation?
As mentioned, $239 vs $249.
Posted on Reply
#48
rruff
rtwjunkieNot a price tag. It's the Manufacturer SUGGESTED Price. See how that worked out on the 1070's and 1080's? By NVIDIA listing the FE higher, for what will indubitably be an inferior card than AIB models, they have communicated to the AIB vendors where a reasonable price to charge actually is.
I really don't care what MSRPs are and how much early adopters get raped. In the US, Nov is the time to buy computer components and I expect to see many opportunities to buy 8GB 480s and 6GB 1060s for less than $200.
Posted on Reply
#49
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
efikkanAs mentioned, $239 vs $249.
I have to say, NVIDIA was very effective with their $249 shell game. Throw that out there as the SUGGESTED price, all while with a wink saying to vendors: "Look what we're charging for the reference model". Everyone then goes around repeating $249 as if it is the actual price.
Posted on Reply
#50
yogurt_21
ZoneDymowell the "performance per dollar" argument is quite up for debate still....
no debate, at 50% more price it needs 50% more performance. It's simply not going to happen. So performance per dollar is not going to be the 1060's thing, not unless for some reason the vendors don't pull a 1070/1080 and actually release it at 249$ and it somehow comes in 25% faster overall. Still not going to happen.

sure if you ignore the 4GB 480 and ONLY compare to the 8GB variant and you can somehow find one at the 249$ price...then it will have better performance per dollar... but ignoring the 199$ 4GB variant is stupid and you won't find a 249$ 1060 for some time.

so I'm a go with completely false that the 1060 will have better performance per dollar at launch than the 480.

should still be a decent card, lack of sli hurts a bit though.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 09:59 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts