Thursday, July 7th 2016

NVIDIA Announces the GeForce GTX 1060, 6 GB GDDR5, $249

NVIDIA today announced its third desktop consumer graphics card based on the "Pascal" architecture, the GeForce GTX 1060. NVIDIA aims to strike a price-performance sweetspot, by pricing this card aggressively at US $249 (MSRP), with its reference "Founders Edition" variant priced at $299. To make sure two of these cards at $500 don't cannibalize the $599-699 GTX 1080, NVIDIA didn't even give this card 2-way SLI support. Retail availability of the cards will commence from 19th July, 2016. NVIDIA claims that the GTX 1060 performs on-par with the GeForce GTX 980 from the previous generation.

The GeForce GTX 1060 is based on the new 16 nm "GP106" silicon, the company's third ASIC based on this architecture after GP100 and GP104. It features 1,280 CUDA cores spread across ten streaming multiprocessors, 80 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and a 192-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 6 GB of memory. The card draws power from a single 6-pin PCIe power connector, as the GPU's TDP is rated at just 120W. The core is clocked up to 1.70 GHz, and the memory at 8 Gbps, at which it belts out 192 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Display outputs include three DisplayPorts 1.4, one HDMI 2.0b, and a DVI.
Add your own comment

182 Comments on NVIDIA Announces the GeForce GTX 1060, 6 GB GDDR5, $249

#176
PP Mguire
N3M3515Did some diggin'
FX 5600 Ultra > 4200 Ti
FX 5700 Ultra > 4600 Ti
6600 GT > 5950 Ultra
7600 GT > 6800 GT
8600 GT............LOL wtf??? garbage!
GTS 250 = 8800 GTX
GTX 460 > GTX 285
GTX 560 (just a refresh of the 460)
GTX 660 = GTX 580
GTX 760 (refresh)
GTX 960 = GTX 680
GTX 1060 = GTX 980 ?
The 660 was a bit slower than the 580, even according to TPU's own benches. The 660ti was the one that was ahead of the 580. Sorry if I misinterpreted the context of this because I mulled over most of the dumb Founder's chatter.
Posted on Reply
#177
Recon-UK
PP MguireThe 660 was a bit slower than the 580, even according to TPU's own benches. The 660ti was the one that was ahead of the 580. Sorry if I misinterpreted the context of this because I mulled over most of the dumb Founder's chatter.
580 was between the 660 and 660Ti, significantly more so more towards a 660Ti if you OC vs OC the 660.
Posted on Reply
#178
PP Mguire
Recon-UK580 was between the 660 and 660Ti, significantly more so more towards a 660Ti if you OC vs OC the 660.
Yea I had a 660 and 2 580s. Was like or nah, 660 couldn't touch my cards. Even OC vs OC.
Posted on Reply
#179
Prima.Vera
sutyiIn all honesty I can not see the point of a GTX 1060 3GB model, unless the new DCC algorithm is doing truely wonders... which I highly doubt. 2GB is barely enough today, 4GB is alright for the foreseeable future (1-1.5 year). Having 3GB would be like sitting between two chairs.

Board partners probably will have 3GB models available tho just to have an nVIDIA alternative at RX 480 4GB price levels.
My card was never using more than 2GB of VRAM on 1080p. And even now when all 3GB are used on 1440p there is no stuttering at all.
Posted on Reply
#180
sutyi
Prima.VeraMy card was never using more than 2GB of VRAM on 1080p. And even now when all 3GB are used on 1440p there is no stuttering at all.
Not yet... that's the point. Seeing the trend of GTA V, Rise of the Tomb Raider and Doom are setting, probably worth spending a couple of bucks more on a 6GB VRAM model. But every one can judge themselves if they need it or not.
Posted on Reply
#181
Vayra86
BansakuNo SLI = My money is going to AMD!
Why on earth would you SLI an x60 or a midranger anyway? You'll run into stutter heaven.
Posted on Reply
#182
xorbe
Vayra86Why on earth would you SLI an x60 or a midranger anyway? You'll run into stutter heaven.
Yeah just 1070 it.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 10:13 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts