Thursday, October 20th 2016

NVIDIA Claws Back Console Chips Business: Nintendo Switch Announced

After months of speculation, the lid is off Nintendo's "NX" project, with the company finally announcing today its much-awaited games console, the Nintendo Switch. With an expected release slated for March 2017, the console blurs the line between a games console and a handheld device, by making use of a docking station which will allow it to connect to a television, much like a traditional games console, while instantly entering a so called "portable mode" when it is undocked. As both a console and a portable device, the Nintendo Switch will use cartridges known as Game Cards, displaying games in a "high definition display" embedded on the console while on the go, with two detachable Joy-Con controllers stepping in as input devices.

For PC hardware enthusiasts, that may not be all too interesting. What is arguably more interesting is that this games console will make use of NVIDIA hardware: most notably, a custom Tegra processor is the one pulling out all of the console's processing needs, with the graphics being served by what the company calls "the same architecture as the world's top-performing GeForce gaming graphics cards."
According to an NVIDIA blog post, the Nintendo Switch's gaming experience is supported not only by custom hardware design with its Tegra chip, but also by leveraging "fully custom software", including "a revamped physics engine, new libraries, advanced game tools and libraries." According to NVIDIA, new gaming APIs were created so as to fully harness the Tegra processor's performance, with their newest API, NVN, being built specifically to bring lightweight, fast gaming to the masses. The console also features hardware-accelerated video playback, as well as custom software for audio effects and rendering. All of this is delivered through a custom operating system, devised for full system integration with the GPU in a bid to increase both performance and efficiency.

After having successfully embedded their technology in Microsoft's XBOX One and Sony's PS4 and upcoming PS4 Pro, as well as the troubled Nintendo Wii U, AMD had effectively achieved full control of the console gaming ecosystem (not counting the many Android systems in the same vein, such as the OUYA, for example). This design win by NVIDIA may come as a surprise, after a company representative's past remarks regarding console's design wins resulted in razor-thin margins, which was purportedly the reason NVIDIA chose not to pursue the XBOX ONE, PS4 or Wii U designs with their own technology. One could however argue that AMD's IP portfolio was better suited for any one of those consoles, due to the company also being able to develop x86-x64 CPUs. At the same time, it can also be argued that NVIDIA's own product line is, in this case, the best match for the Switch's design philosophy, considering that the GPU technology integrated within the custom Tegra chip is almost certainly more energy efficient than AMD's current offerings (considering, of course, NVIDIA's Pascal undisputed energy efficiency over AMD's latest GCN implementation). All things considered, though, it does seem like AMD still has control of the living room - at least when it comes to their respective implementation's power levels and PC-relevant characteristics.
Sources: NVIDIABlogs, Nintendo Switch
Add your own comment

54 Comments on NVIDIA Claws Back Console Chips Business: Nintendo Switch Announced

#51
SaltyFish
Xzibit
alucasaAs far as I can see, the console era I used to know is coming to an end. Actually, it has ended already when Playstation 3 was succeeded.

The hardware progression is too fast for consoles now. Console used to be a gaming machine you could have for 5 ~ 10 years without further investment. Now, consoles have lifepan of 2 years or so.
Console gaming machines are aimed at a more visual gaming experience. This is in a strange place where its in the phablet realm where the upgrade cycle is yearly.
The hardware progression is why PS4 and XB1 are doing incremental revisions (and even then, it's mostly as a 4K/VR thing since the consoles came out at that awkward transitional phase... games aren't going to change). Nintendo has taken a different approach from Sony and Microsoft starting with the Wii; they've focused more on gameplay instead of high-powered graphics. If Ninty continues with that trend (and the Switch's quasi-tablet form seems to indicate that), then they can get away with NOT needing incremental revisions. Besides, even if smartphones and tablets have a yearly update cycle, how much refinement does that bring to games? Granted, games like Clash of Clans and Subway Surfer don't need high-end hardware because of compatibility due to the wide range in power of phones/tablets. Nintendo can definitely put out some higher quality games (though admittedly phone/tablet games set the bar stupidly low) that don't demand hardware power. I found Splatoon more enjoyable than yet another 3D modern military FPS.

I'd have to disagree with console gaming machines being aimed for a more visual experience. If anything, it's more about actually playing the game. It's simple and straightforward; you plug the thing in and you play. That's really the appeal of it. No fussing with graphics as if core gameplay depends on it or spending 1500 USD on dual flagship graphics cards every year so you can run the latest AAA game at 1440p, 120+fps, and 32x SSAA. I'm reminded of this comic...

Posted on Reply
#52
Camm
I don't get why Nintendo continues doing this shit. It has an excellent first party library that Sony or MS would die for, all it needed to do was ape the PS4\XB1 and it'd have a killer console on its hands.

Instead its ostracised itself once again both architecturally (porting costs money guys) and performance (porting is harder). It also somewhat (in a limited fashion) cannibalizes its own market with the DS.
Posted on Reply
#53
BiggieShady
SteevoI wish someone would invent a mobile device that could do all that..... with a nice camera, and the ability to download apps.
Maybe one of those apps will be about hunting pokemons ... and be made by nintendo ... and maybe after it will be moved to this docking thingy with all of its userbase ... I feel some basic addiction will be needed to sell someone yet another portable gaming device
Posted on Reply
#54
Ithanul
SaltyFishI'd have to disagree with console gaming machines being aimed for a more visual experience. If anything, it's more about actually playing the game. It's simple and straightforward; you plug the thing in and you play. That's really the appeal of it. No fussing with graphics as if core gameplay depends on it or spending 1500 USD on dual flagship graphics cards every year so you can run the latest AAA game at 1440p, 120+fps, and 32x SSAA. I'm reminded of this comic...

Lmao, darn, that pretty much sums up a lot of "hardcore" PC gamers.

Kind of the reason to this day I find it amusing when a slug fest breaks out over such topics. I'm more of the as long as the game runs and looks decent, I'm good.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 09:05 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts