Monday, April 3rd 2017

AMD's Ryzen 5 1400 Gaming Performance Leaked by Early Adopter

Even though the NDA still isn't up on AMD's second volley of Ryzen-based CPUs, some lucky buyers are already running some of the upcoming Ryzen 5 processors after some sellers jumped the gun. Now, a YouTube video by user "Santiago Santiago." is making the rounds in which he compares gaming performance between the Ryzen 5 1400 (4-core, 8-thread part @ 3.2 GHz base, 3.4 GHz boost), Intel's i5 7400 (4-cores @ 3.0 GHz base, 3.5 GHz boost), and the Pentium G4560, a Kaby Lake dual-core CPU with Hyper Threading @ 3.5 GHz base clocks. The user even snapped a picture proving he has his hands on this chip.
AMD's Ryzen 5 1400 was also tested while overclocked to 3.8 GHz - which puts it on a somewhat level playing field with Intel's i5 7400, sometimes being bested by it (like in Battlefield 1) and sometimes besting it (like in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt). A Kingston HyperX Fury 2133@2666 MHz kit was used for both systems. Naturally, the 2-core, 4-thread Pentium G4560 trails both other tested processors by a fair margin in most games. The user has posted an index of sorts for the time slices on the YouTube video:
  • OCing at 00:16
  • Specs at 00:41
  • Battlefield 1 DX12 at 01:18
  • Fallout 4 at 04:03
  • GTA 5 at 04:51
  • Hitman DX12 at 06:49
  • Just Cause 3 at 07:39
  • Assassin's Creed Unity at 08:06
  • The Witcher 3 at 08:57
  • Rise Of The Tomb Raider DX12 at 10:02

Keep in mind that AMD's Ryzen gaming performance has seen multiple improvements as of late, though these improvements have been more dependent on game developers than on AMD itself. However, the company is looking towards BIOS updates that should improve Ryzen's support and handling of high-speed DDR4 memory (with some latency improvements to boot), which should also provide some measure of a performance improvement.
Sources: Videocardz, YouTube
Add your own comment

29 Comments on AMD's Ryzen 5 1400 Gaming Performance Leaked by Early Adopter

#26
ratirt
ASOTBecause is old gen,970 has a much better tesselation unit, it's a lot more efficient, a lot more overclockable and has 3,5/4gb vram, while the 780ti has only 3gb
I don't think that half meg ram will help with anything. I got 780 Ti and believe me I wouldn't swap it with 970 ever. Maybe it's not a down grade but improvement isn't either.

On the subject.
I think AMD has to push the RyZen clocks a bit in the near future. I mean 4.2 is achievable with current R7's but it costs a lot of power that needs to be delivered. If RyZen could hit 4.5 with reasonable Vcore and power that would be great. It would be much faster in multi but also single threaded apps. I only hope they can manage that this year.
Posted on Reply
#27
Totally
Am I the only one who noticed that the framerates on the intel systems were doing their best impressions of a rollercoaster while the AMD sys stayed fairly consistent without any dramatic drops?
Posted on Reply
#28
ratirt
TotallyAm I the only one who noticed that the framerates on the intel systems were doing their best impressions of a rollercoaster while the AMD sys stayed fairly consistent without any dramatic drops?
I noticed that too. Besides I can say with confidence that the entire lineup of RyZen's shows same behavior. Frames don't have that much jitter between min and max.
Posted on Reply
#29
medi01
9700 ProI had GTX780Ti few weeks ago and I sold it just because of that 970.
Your hardware choices are mind blowing.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 11th, 2025 01:49 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts