Thursday, April 13th 2017

AMD's RX 500 Series Specifications, Performance Leaked

A leak of what appears to be AMD's presentation on the Radeon RX 500 series has brought confirmation on specifications and details of the new line-up - which includes the RX 580, RX 570, the (until now) missing RX 560, and the RX 550. It would seem AMD has now opted for a new, dual-fan reference design, instead of their usual single-fan, blower-style coolers.

The RX 580 has a base clock of 1257 MHz, and a boost clock of 1340 MHz (74 MHz greater than the RX 480's 1266 MHz). It's a Polaris chip alright, packing the same 36 Compute Units (2304 Stream Processors, and up to 8 GB of GDDR5 memory across a 256-bit interface. AMD apparently decided to compare the RX 580 to the R9 380, which allows the company to show some relevant performance improvements (which wouldn't be possible with the RX 480, now would it.)
The RX 570 also keeps the same core configuration as the RX 470 it substitutes, but with an increased boost clock up to 1244 MHz (by 38 MHz over the reference values for the RX 470) over 32 Compute Units, and will be offered in 4 GB and 8 GB variants.
The RX 560, on the other hand, is where AMD has decided to mix up the game a little, with the RX 560 seeing an increased Stream Processor count over its previous-gen counterpart: 1024 against the RX 460's 896. It's TMUs also see an increase from 56 to 64, though the number of ROPs remains the same. It also features the greatest boost clock increase of the entire RX 500 series, at 57 MHz (to 1257 MHz on the RX 560 over the RX 460's 1200 MHz.) This card will see configurations with up to 4 GB memory over a 128-bit bus.
Finally, the new kid on the block, the RX 550 comes in at 512 Stream Processors (8 CUs) clocked in at 1183 MHz boost. Its 2 GB of memory seem appropriate to the crunching prowess of the little card that will, which AMD is positioning for competitive MOBA's and lower-requirements gaming.
Sources: Videocardz, Jisakutech
Add your own comment

68 Comments on AMD's RX 500 Series Specifications, Performance Leaked

#26
dj-electric
Why compering the card to a GTX 970? compere it to the GTX 780!!!
NO, frack it, go straight against the behemoths like GTX 690, that was super expensive and totally is a fair comparison.


/s
Posted on Reply
#27
ZoneDymo
Everyone said or thought it already but man....amd...really?...teh 300 series?
Just said, I mean, how can they "sell" this to us with a straight face, for shame, for SHAME
Posted on Reply
#28
Tsukiyomi91
comparing to a GTX970 shows how low AMD has stoop in hopes for selling their cards. Seems they've stopped innovating again.
Posted on Reply
#29
TheoneandonlyMrK
PlayStation pro chip ,ps4 slim chip ,Xbox one node swap ,xboxscorpio, RyZen CPUs , Polaris refinement;), Vega, I'd say they have both innovated And been busy.
This release doesn't look that inspired yet but I'm not interested in mid range cards ATM so there's hope they might have something worth while in the bag.
This folding rig im rockin has earned the same amount in a year(190million+) that it took me many ,many years to do before (10million)with multiple pcs at times too, using much less juice,I say this just so my purchase choice reasons out there, and it was an ok one i sleep well.
Posted on Reply
#30
OneCool
SWEET!!! It's faster than a 2yo card!!!!!!! :nutkick:
Posted on Reply
#31
lightofhonor
Nihilus....which is like comparing it to a 280x......which is like comparing it to a 7970.....which was released like 6 years ago.

-----------------

The 560 looks to be a solid 1080p card, but those are a dime a dozen anyhow.
To be fair, a 380 is a 285, not a 280X. A 380X is an M295X/M390X but clocked higher.

Unless these overclock a heck of a lot better, a 480 on sale is a better buy.
Posted on Reply
#32
quilciri
Ok, AMD. what's this for?

The 200-300 refresh added full DX12 support; 300-400 was a completely new architecture. 400-500 is?

I have a request.

Please stop making me wait for a single GPU that can push the (now TWO years old) 1440p, 144hz, freesync monitor. I wonder how many other people are in the "nope, still not Vega" mood with me.

I feel I've been patient.
Posted on Reply
#33
oxidized
quilciriOk, AMD. what's this for?

The 200-300 refresh added full DX12 support; 300-400 was a completely new architecture. 400-500 is?

I have a request.

Please stop making me wait for a single GPU that can push the (now TWO years old) 1440p, 144hz, freesync monitor. I wonder how many other people are in the "nope, still not Vega" mood with me.

I feel I've been patient.
I don't really think you'll get something that powerful anytime soon, unless you're playing games like csgo, but then at that point, why would you need 2 2k monitor both at 144hz
Posted on Reply
#34
Xzibit
We all saw this coming not surprised
the54thvoidUntil reviews hard to say but every site thus far has confirmed it's just a 480 (or the Polaris arch) with refined energy use (so slightly higher clocks). Glad I got my dad a RX 480, at least this means the architecture is good for a few years.
What did your dad ever do to you to deserve such punishment? :p

I picked up a 480 OC 8GB a while ago, don't know why didn't need but it was on sale $60 off (1/4th) and only 1 left so I took the bait. The wattman profiles are nice to play with. Been able to shave 40w avg off on the handful of games I actually play with same settings and achive similar FPS. Plus idle is at 7w and H264 movies are at 14w using same profile could do better if I were to seperate them but thats when my lazyness kicks in. Large savings though 50% and 65% according to GPU-Z and in comparison to W1zzard reviews.
Posted on Reply
#35
SKL_H
This is just disappointing really, I was hoping to upgrade to 500 series :-( , I made a good choice getting a GTX980ti witch performs more or less than the GTX1070 :-).
Posted on Reply
#36
TheGuruStud
SKL_HThis is just disappointing really, I was hoping to upgrade to 500 series :-( , I made a good choice getting a GTX980ti witch performs more or less than the GTX1070 :).
Faster lol. You're not even 15% off from OCed 1080 with a good OC.
Posted on Reply
#37
Totally
RejZoRWhy are they comparing them to R9 300 series and not RX 400 series? o_O
At the end of the day these are just 400 series cards with higher clocks, which aren't unattainable by the current rx 4x0 cards. So the isn't any reason have a single thought about these new cards if you have an RX 470/480. AMD also realizes this so their logically targeting those who would actually benefit therefore more likely upgrade to.
Posted on Reply
#38
rhythmeister
Oh for a recent single slot card with this sort of power...
Posted on Reply
#39
_larry
Sigh...
I guess I will stick with my R9 290 still...
or file in line with the Nvidia crowd again...
Posted on Reply
#40
Casecutter
Look at this way W1zzard has a GTX 1060 6Gb 12% above a RX480 8Gb (ref vs ref); if the new cooling provides the 1340Mhz boost clocks consistently even that 6% increase might help if it sustains boost there more.

Yeah, it's all a big yawn unless RGT hits with a RX 580 8Gb $210 MSRP, but given that most Customs even now have been holding to like $240 (most don't even push rebates) I'd see that as unlikely. The RX 480 8Gb (ref) was a decent enough entry though not at the MSRP $229.
Posted on Reply
#41
Lionheart
I just want to find out if the 580's can overclock to 1500Mhz then I'll consider one.
Posted on Reply
#42
OneCool
LionheartI just want to find out if the 580's can overclock to 1500Mhz then I'll consider one.
It will!!! For about 5 seconds in notepad :p :slap:
Posted on Reply
#43
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
OneCoolIt will!!! For about 5 seconds in notepad :p :slap:
There are many 480s that come close to that already...
Posted on Reply
#45
ShurikN
CasecutterLook at this way W1zzard has a GTX 1060 6Gb 12% above a RX480 8Gb (ref vs ref); if the new cooling provides the 1340Mhz boost clocks consistently even that 6% increase might help if it sustains boost there more.
When was the last time you read a review here at TPU
Posted on Reply
#46
Kohl Baas
They comparing to the 300s because they targeting people who has those or older tech. They don't want 400 owners to throw away their cards. It would be nonsense, especially in the lower segment the cards targeting.
Posted on Reply
#47
Nihilus
AMD's all-new flagship card: Performance below the 295x2, Fury, and .... Scorpio

ie performance behind its own 3 year old card, 2 year old card, and ... a console
Posted on Reply
#48
rruff
the54thvoidUntil reviews hard to say but every site thus far has confirmed it's just a 480 (or the Polaris arch) with refined energy use (so slightly higher clocks).
Mostly a rebrand but not quite. Refined energy use is actually a really good thing. If AMD matches or beats Nvidia on efficiency then we should be seeing lots of competition in laptop cards.

Man, all the whining in this thread! It's been less the year since Polaris was introduced, and you expect something completely new? From tiny AMD? With Polaris, Zen, and Vega coming soon, I think they are working overtime.
Posted on Reply
#49
Kohl Baas
NihilusAMD's all-new flagship card: Performance below the 295x2, Fury, and .... Scorpio

ie performance behind its own 3 year old card, 2 year old card, and ... a console
I didn't see AMD's new flagship card yet, dear troll.

As far as I know, that will launch at the 5th of May alongside with Prey...
Posted on Reply
#50
sutyi
They just should've called these: RX 465, RX 475 and RX 485. As per their original naming scheme...

Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 22nd, 2024 03:31 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts