Monday, July 10th 2017
Intel Pentium G4560 Cannibalizing Core i3 Sales, Company Effectively Kills it
Intel Pentium G4560 dual-core socket LGA1151 processor is too good for Intel's comfort. For the past two generations, Intel has enabled HyperThreading on Pentium dual-core chips, and expanded L3 cache amount from 2 MB to 3 MB; which had been the two key differentiators for the company's Core i3 desktop lineup from Pentium. HyperThreading was warranted by an increasing number of games and applications which wouldn't work without at least 4 logical CPUs. The G4560 is a formidable part at its USD $64 price - 2 cores, 4 threads, the latest "Kaby Lake" micro-architecture, 3 MB L3 cache, and 3.50 GHz clock speeds. On the flip side, it makes buying Core i3 dual-core parts close to double its price a dumb option. Intel's solution? Effectively kill it.
According to a DigiWorthy report, Intel has decided to scale down production of the Pentium G4560 in a bid to cripple its availability, and force consumers to opt for pricier 7th generation Core i3 parts. The cheapest part, the Core i3-7100, is priced almost double that of the G4560, at $117. You get the same two "Kaby Lake" cores, 4 threads enabled by HyperThreading, the same 3 MB L3 cache, but slightly higher clock speeds of 3.90 GHz, and a faster integrated graphics core, if you use one. Does the extra 400 MHz warrant double the price? Not even in the case of Intel's priciest Core i7 SKUs. All prices are Intel's "recommended customer price" for 1000-unit tray quantities.
Source:
DigiWorthy
According to a DigiWorthy report, Intel has decided to scale down production of the Pentium G4560 in a bid to cripple its availability, and force consumers to opt for pricier 7th generation Core i3 parts. The cheapest part, the Core i3-7100, is priced almost double that of the G4560, at $117. You get the same two "Kaby Lake" cores, 4 threads enabled by HyperThreading, the same 3 MB L3 cache, but slightly higher clock speeds of 3.90 GHz, and a faster integrated graphics core, if you use one. Does the extra 400 MHz warrant double the price? Not even in the case of Intel's priciest Core i7 SKUs. All prices are Intel's "recommended customer price" for 1000-unit tray quantities.
80 Comments on Intel Pentium G4560 Cannibalizing Core i3 Sales, Company Effectively Kills it
www.hardware.fr/news/15185/penurie-pentium-g4560.html
My french is a bit rusty, but thanks to my best friend Google Translate, I can give you a rough translation of an entire news piece, which became a basis for this madness... That is it. So, it went from "It is hard to get a G4560 in France throughout the summer" to "Intel is killing Pentium G-lineup" in a matter of 2 reposts.... cause ya know "yada-yada, grain of salt...."
BTW, last night my local store still had G4560, G4600 and G4620. Today (after all of Russian and Ukrainian websites re-wrote this same article in a matter of hours, with some pessimistic personal input), people started buying these CPUs like crazy.
As of this morning that same store now only has G4620 and i3-6100 (both already marked "in short supply").
@btarunr , you've caused a global pentium G shortage! :nutkick:
G4560
translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=el&ie=UTF-8&u=https://www.skroutz.gr/s/10787786/Intel-Pentium-Dual-Core-G4560-Box.html?from=catspan&keyphrase=g4560&edit-text=
G4600
translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=el&ie=UTF-8&u=https://www.skroutz.gr/s/10787774/Intel-Pentium-Dual-Core-G4600-Box.html&edit-text=
Even Bristol Ridge is not out in public (if you don't count HP pre-built exclusives, khm... same guys that ruined an excellent FX8800P and everything that followed), which means that Summit Ridge, even with all of its speculated appeal and an apparent demand, will not arrive on the market at least until Vega is out (which at this point I can't even speculate about when this will happen).
Was they really a surprise for Intel? Gaming with my G4560 happily. ;)
edited...Amazon has terrible titles
www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&IsNodeId=1&N=100007671%20600565702%20600005583
... that price, though... Probably the same way I play on my i3-6100 : you launch the game by clicking on the icon and you play it :D
At stock 3.7GHz I also get ~80% load in heavy modern titles, but it does not really affect my FPS. Quake champions at 1080p low gives near 120FPS on my GTX950, but due to game netcode issues I keep it at 1080p med + vsync on.
No issues in Dota 2, Paragon, Lawbreakers (tried it a couple of times, though). Same goes for some CPU-intensive single player games: just beat DOOM, currently trying out Fallout 4.
Haven't tried latest BF or CoD games, because I'm not a big fan. I think the last Call of Duty I've personally played was CoD2 back in college, and bought the first Modern Warfare for my younger brother.
you don't get a turbo on an entry level motor and you don't get features like HT on entry level cpus.
Its called entry level for a reason.
Yes because engine turbo can be switched off, by laser or whatever Intel uses to turn i3 into a Pentium or celeron?
Entry level isn;t defined by some random features, you feel are rightfully knocked off from a Pentium or Celeron.
One site suggests a conspiracy based on who know what and it becomes fact. It's embarrassing to see other tech sites making fun of TPU for this "news".
Journalism is dead.
Why don't we talk about the real issues going on at Intel? Why don't we talk about the implications, to gaming/high end computers, of Aicha S. Evans's job at Intel?
BTW, don't you think that the EU would be all over Intel if they actually did something like this?
IIRC, AMD created (maybe revived) this entry level CPU market and Intel responded with CPU's that made AMD's offerings look pathetic. Remember the Athlon X2 200 series?
In other news, AMD and Nvidia limiting production of their GPU's to drive up prices.
:shadedshu: