Friday, March 2nd 2018
Battlefield V Takes Players Back to World War II
If there's something that Battlefield 1 and Call of Duty: WWII have taught us, it's that nostalgia sells - and it sells a lot. The numbers don't lie. Battlefield 1 not only sold faster than Battlefield 4, but it also broke the 25 million players barrier not so long ago. Call of Duty: WWII didn't do too shabby either becoming the best-selling Call of Duty installment since Black Ops II. The ultimate goal for EA now is to keep the traction going and that's where Battlefield V comes in. Battlefield V, originally known internally as Battlefield 2, is the direct sequel to Battlefield 1, and as thus, the game's setting and story will take place in World War II. Hardcore Battlefield fans might recall that EA previously visited the World War II era in Battlefield 1942. However, the publisher has promised that Battlefield V won't a mere remaster but a completely new game from the ground up.
For better or worse, EA and loot boxes always seem to find themselves together in the same sentence. Anonymous sources have confirmed that Battlefield V will have loot boxes However, the loot boxes are limited to cosmetic items to customize your soldier just like in Battlefield 1 - so no worries there. EA has promised a playable "next Battlefield experience" this year at the E3 event in June. Battlefield V is expected to launch later this year.
Source:
VentureBeat
For better or worse, EA and loot boxes always seem to find themselves together in the same sentence. Anonymous sources have confirmed that Battlefield V will have loot boxes However, the loot boxes are limited to cosmetic items to customize your soldier just like in Battlefield 1 - so no worries there. EA has promised a playable "next Battlefield experience" this year at the E3 event in June. Battlefield V is expected to launch later this year.
31 Comments on Battlefield V Takes Players Back to World War II
With the odd exception (being BF2142) Battlefield has always been about actual wars. A lot of shit happened in WW1, A lot of shit happened in WW2, A lot of shit happened in Vietnam, A lotta shit happened in IraQ
Not a lot of shit happened in the falklands apart from the British army opening a can of whoop ass on salty Argentines. The British Army went out there to defend the people who voted to stay a British Colony.
We sent loads of people across there to fight. Some hardware on a boat malfunctioned or didn't work as it should have resulting in the loss of a Navy ship or two or damage to others. Possibly some chemical weapons used by both sides. Argentines claimed they used tear gas to clear barracks, British Army claimed they used something far stronger and lethal but those claims have never been proven.
War is hell but compared to all the other wars. Its a walk in a park. It lacks that excitement and dramatic affect that knowing what a shithole soldiers are fighting in and all the atrocities and war crimes one side or the other might have committed or in the act of committing.
It was a boring war.
Better get your cheque book out to pay for that premium R&D time and all the staff Sony need to hire to make sure you get your PS5 released the same time as BF:V
That game was pretty hardcore back in the day.
Unfortunately they got bought out by another company who then got bought out by another company and this company doesn't really do much with the fps genre apart from make GTA games
There are some really great shooters out now, like verdun and red orchestra 2. These mass market AAA games will be ruined by microtransactions, not worth taking any interest in IMO.
If they finally made BFBC3, I'd be interested, but modern EA and dice could never make a proper Bad Company game today.