Wednesday, April 25th 2018
Windows 10 Lean SKU Spotted in Latest Redstone 5 Preview Build
Microsoft is secretly working on a stripped-down version of their Windows 10 operating system. The new 'Windows 10 Lean' SKU is specifically designed for devices where storage space is a luxury. Compared to the Home and Pro SKUs, this 'Lean' version is 2 GB smaller when fully installed. Microsoft didn't achieve this by an act of magic though. They had to eliminate many features and tools like the desktop wallpapers, Registry Editor, Microsoft Management Console, Internet Explorer, and many more. Windows 10 Lean is currently in the development phase. And since Microsoft hasn't officially announced it, there's a good chance that it might not be released.
Source:
Windows Central
24 Comments on Windows 10 Lean SKU Spotted in Latest Redstone 5 Preview Build
Or use LTSB.
Back then harddrives and low end Atoms were the best the tech could give for the provided constraints, but today, even mediocre phones are Flash equipped with decent processors and heckuva hardware acceleration capabilities to cover the deficit.
Today, Windows does run well on tablets, so hardware requirements aren't the issue here. And while any improvement to the storage/processing efficiency is welcomed, going as extreme as to nix such powerful (and not that much of a space hog) sings less "we want to accommodate your crappy PC," more "we don't want you to tinker with this one."
It also amazes me how there are new 'versions' of the same OS popping up everywhere when Microsoft sold us W10 with the promise of a single version that's here to stay. Could this get any more ironical... its almost getting easier to pick the right Linux distro :laugh:
Internally, Windows is rolling release.
Why do you call win 7 obsolete? just because m$ doesnt update it? LOL :laugh:
7 is like XP few years ago, there were many newer OS:s, but people just kept going on with that ancient OS. Come on, it's over 8½ years old already and won't even support new hardware without tweaking, and getting high-end hardware without support for DX12.. meh, just meh. Hell, even my good old GTX 980 runs DX12 fine.
But honestly, it could be argued that this is more on the level of having different tiers of the same platform. The backend is the same in all (API capabilities, etc), but the front end is simply tiered to give you access the said back end depending on how much you cough up. Very SAAS-esque, if you thought about it. A tool's age is a problem only when the cost of maintaining/using it exceeds the gains. And so far, maintaining a functional, productive Windows 7/8.1 machine isn't much of an issue (except for those who require post-skylake processors/platforms).
And how far has d3d12's market share gone these days? 20-something titles with 5 being exclusives?
EDIT: Ah, device manager, hell yeah, since Windows 95. But why stick with some old crap since it doesn't support the new tehnologies? I upgraded my 8.1 Pro to 10 Pro the same day when 10 was launched and I don't have any bad to say about this.
Still, Windows 2000 Pro was and is the best ever (then on that hardware, now on retro hardware). ;)