Tuesday, May 8th 2018

A Push for the Higher Margin: Intel Reportedly Discontinues Production of Its H310 Chipset

A report straight out of DigiTimes, citing industry sources, says that Intel has discontinued production of its H310 chipset. The decision has apparently stemmed from lower than expected production capacity for chipsets on the 14 nm process. When that happens, production focus must shift to a specific part: in this case, Intel obviously went with the option with the lower opportunity cost, and increased production of the Z370 chipset: the one with the increased feature-set, and, most likely than not, higher margins.

After a single month of tight supply for the H310 chipset, motherboard makers are now forced to use Intel's B360 chipset in their more cost-conscious options as well - a part which carries higher cost, and thus precludes manufacturers from hitting all the price points they usually would with a fully vertical Intel chipset lineup. Speculation has emerged claiming Intel suspended the supply of H310 because they have chosen to conduct a manufacturing process change from the tight-supply 14 nm (used across almost all of Intel's production stack, both consumer and enterprise) to a 22 nm fabrication technology. Further speculation places this constrained 14 nm supply as existent because of the delay in advancing to 10 nm, a process that Intel expected to be producing in volume by now (and since a while back, to be fair).
Sources: DigiTies, via ETeknix
Add your own comment

62 Comments on A Push for the Higher Margin: Intel Reportedly Discontinues Production of Its H310 Chipset

#51
GoldenX
No one with money to spare complains about only U$S5, welcome to South America, thanks to what you and the soiviets did during the cold war here, we are like this.
Posted on Reply
#52
bug
Vya DomusIf you build something with those kinds of specs you are certainly trying to save every cent , so 3% is definitely relevant.

Of course , I fully expect the overwhelming elitist majority here to dismiss that but as difficult as it might be to understand , someone out there is counting every dollar they have to pay.

Also why do you make the assumption that this is relevant just to independent users ? If a company wants to buy 100 PCs , they will sure as hell care about 3%.
Not to mention Intel isn't selling their p45 chipset anymore. Can you imagine how cheap that would be these days? But no, greedy bastards just can't have enough of screwing the little guy. :facepalm:
GoldenXNo one with money to spare complains about only U$S5, welcome to South America, thanks to what you and the soiviets did during the cold war here, we are like this.
Yeah, you yourselves bear absolutely no blame (as if you weren't even present). It's always someone else's fault.
Posted on Reply
#53
GoldenX
bugYeah, you yourselves bear absolutely no blame (as if you weren't even present). It's always someone else's fault.
Of course we have a third of the blame, thanks for your 2/3.
Posted on Reply
#54
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
GoldenXNo one with money to spare complains about only U$S5, welcome to South America, thanks to what you and the soiviets did during the cold war here, we are like this.
No one without money to spare should be building or buying a brand new computer.
Posted on Reply
#55
GoldenX
newtekie1No one without money to spare should be building or buying a brand new computer.
So we stop production, return to the stone age, or simply be a colony again?
Posted on Reply
#56
hat
Enthusiast
Can't say much about the politics of the situation, but still, if you're building a new computer, a difference of $5 shouldn't make or break you...
Posted on Reply
#57
bug
GoldenXSo we stop production, return to the stone age, or simply be a colony again?
If that's the best you can do, yes.
Posted on Reply
#58
DeathtoGnomes
GoldenXSo we stop production, return to the stone age, or simply be a colony again?
I can teach you how to make the stone wheel!

You have to admit that corruption and greed has ruined more [South American] countries than the US or Rudsha could, everyone has to pay someone off and that gets passed on to the consumer, which is really no different than any other country. So lets keep politics out of this and stop finger pointing, mmmk?
Posted on Reply
#59
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
GoldenXNo one with money to spare complains about only U$S5, welcome to South America, thanks to what you and the soiviets did during the cold war here, we are like this.
Yep, Newtekie did it. :p

Surely you must realize no one 55 and younger could have had ANY part in what you claim. Now, let’s get real and return to the topic of the demise of a product line. No one here can fix the situation.
Posted on Reply
#60
GoldenX
Good thing about this is that finally Intel cheapest chipset has raid and more than 4 USB ports.
Posted on Reply
#61
bug
GoldenXGood thing about this is that finally Intel cheapest chipset has raid and more than 4 USB ports.
And PCIe 3.0 ;)
Posted on Reply
#62
JoniISkandar
dj-electricFor about 180$, H310+i3 8100 are a very capable base for a gaming PC, and office one as well. They are deciding to lose market share if the article is correct.
huh RYZEN 3 2200G is Waaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyy better than 8100 for casual gamer and Office Work,, A320 is cheap motherboard + 99$ 2200G that include Vega inside. people that only use for Office and want play some fun casual game like rocket league can enjoy
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Mar 7th, 2025 06:09 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts