Wednesday, May 23rd 2018
Battlefield V Revealed: 1942 Reimagined
EA-DICE released the first reveal trailer of "Battlefield V." The reveal shows a slice of what appears to be actual in-game footage. The game re-imagines events of WWII, after the series' excursion with WWI. It portrays a pitched battle somewhere in Europe with British troops fighting Nazis. There's also the depiction of female soldiers, hinting at the possibility of strong female characters, or even a female protagonist (as opposed to second-fiddle female NPCs in the likes of Battlefield 4 campaign). There are no technical details of the game, but it appears to leverage DirectX 12 API with even more features than Battlefield 1. Battlefield V is slated for release on October 19, 2018. It's open to pre-orders on Origin.The official trailer follows after the break
89 Comments on Battlefield V Revealed: 1942 Reimagined
That picture I posted with the SAS in northern Africa. Without knowing the context of the picture you can just tell those guys are not to be messed with.
Maybe I will change my mind when I see more but at the moment some things about this game are making me cringe in that trailer.
Did I miss the Katana because I re-watched it and don't see it. Maybe its Atreus grown up?
As far as i'm concerned they can add or do anything they like in a made up storyline, including cowboys and Indians fighting aliens …. oh wait, that's been done.
it's a shame where things have gone to.
On a separate note, so not aimed at Tehehe, quite frankly I agree that the portrayal here in this game appears to be somewhat historically unrealistic (if only because I don't think the advancement of the shown prosthetic appears realistic) but in context it's a game, anyone who knew the real me would not call me "politically correct" however I do have respect and some of the comment here is bordering on bigotry (or appears to be whether intentional or not), we have female members here, soldiers (current and retired) who have fought alongside women on the battlefield as well had close friends who lose limbs and volunteer to come back to combat roles whilst having a prosthetic, so can I ask that we tone down comment that might suggest some sections of society may not be worthy to serve their countries for whatever reason because it's happening today, by all means focus on historical references if you must.
My point still stands . Women on the frontile is far from being an unhistorical event and seeing so many peoples ( don't know if they deserve this word ) primarely complaining about this instead of many other REAL issues is shocking to say the least .
In any case, I'll put women aside for a sec. The whole marketing squad looks out of place. It's one thing to take a singular moment (D-Day, where some AMERICAN soldiers got mohawks and put on warpaint as a homage to American Indians), but it's strange to make that the image of WW2... as if that's the sum of things now. It has never been so. If they wanted some artistic flexibility like this, they should've just made a modern war game. People actually have fairly drab expectations of WW2, and it's not a "peculiarity". It comprises just about everything they care about, when they think of that era.
Better yet, just play Hellblade and support a worthwhile game studio... if you want chicks with warpaint. Pick up Heavenly Sword while you're at it. They made two badass chick games.