Sunday, September 2nd 2018
Riot Games Gaffe Results in Sexism Allegations at Pax West 2018
In what ended up overshadowing most of the news coming out of PAX West 2018, Riot Games delivered a masterclass in how not to handle things in a politically-correct environment. The situation in question concerned a series of sessions that were targeted to, and I quote, "women and non-binary folks" which was well intended and meant to be more of an acknowledgement of the minorities in the gaming industry.
Unfortunately, this wording and then poor-execution and follow-up from their part meant that things quickly turned sour. People at the event were quick to notice that the room reserved for these sessions appeared to have volunteers attempt to keep them away. What was intended to be a support session then turned into allegations flying all around, and social media lit abuzz with what seemed to be discrimination against straight men by the company.These sessions were targeted at increasing the gender diversity in the gaming industry by offering resume reviews, interactions with women employees of Riot Games and were scheduled to be held throughout the event from 10 am to 6 pm. When asked for clarification, a Riot Games recruiter made things worse by saying men were allowed but only after 2:30 pm which was quickly turned into fodder for the ever-growing fire that now added segregation allegations as well. Making things worse were more Riot employees using their social media accounts to double down on this stance by invoking the privilege argument, and calling out some of the complainers as "manbabies". These were primarily targeted at members of the League of Legends subreddit who in turn were, in the author's opinion, extrapolating things beyond reason but ended up being another case study example of how not to handle things. Riot Games ended up having to provide a statement late last night local time, which did little to assuage those who felt that anyone who paid for an event ticket should have received the same treatment as others. This has since resulted in many people, game journalists and industry personnel alike, taking sides and opening up a can of worms that, in this author's opinion, both sides need to acknowledge and work towards a resolution sooner than later.
[Update, September 7 2018: Two Riot Games employees, including one referenced above, have since been let go by the company as reported by The Verge]
Unfortunately, this wording and then poor-execution and follow-up from their part meant that things quickly turned sour. People at the event were quick to notice that the room reserved for these sessions appeared to have volunteers attempt to keep them away. What was intended to be a support session then turned into allegations flying all around, and social media lit abuzz with what seemed to be discrimination against straight men by the company.These sessions were targeted at increasing the gender diversity in the gaming industry by offering resume reviews, interactions with women employees of Riot Games and were scheduled to be held throughout the event from 10 am to 6 pm. When asked for clarification, a Riot Games recruiter made things worse by saying men were allowed but only after 2:30 pm which was quickly turned into fodder for the ever-growing fire that now added segregation allegations as well. Making things worse were more Riot employees using their social media accounts to double down on this stance by invoking the privilege argument, and calling out some of the complainers as "manbabies". These were primarily targeted at members of the League of Legends subreddit who in turn were, in the author's opinion, extrapolating things beyond reason but ended up being another case study example of how not to handle things. Riot Games ended up having to provide a statement late last night local time, which did little to assuage those who felt that anyone who paid for an event ticket should have received the same treatment as others. This has since resulted in many people, game journalists and industry personnel alike, taking sides and opening up a can of worms that, in this author's opinion, both sides need to acknowledge and work towards a resolution sooner than later.
[Update, September 7 2018: Two Riot Games employees, including one referenced above, have since been let go by the company as reported by The Verge]
192 Comments on Riot Games Gaffe Results in Sexism Allegations at Pax West 2018
TL;DR: "Live and let live." I have no time for people overly emotional about their own private business that doesn't (nor should) concern me.
Otherwise, work out your own issues. But if they persist in this, "mean words" are the last thing they need to worry about. They will eventually reap something far worse. The public at large just isn't aware enough yet.
I have nothing more to say here otherwise. My point is lost on ford, apparently. He's continously countering with points that fail to address the actual questions, completely oblivious that most would consider what he is doing here political activism. It's disappointing.
Case in point: segregation was ended by the Brown v. Board of Education ruling which was brought forward by 13 parents and their 20 kids. You never heard about Oliver Brown et. al. because they weren't political activists. They were people harmed by the government and went through the proper legal channels to the Supreme Court which overturned Plessy v. Ferguson (a Civil War reconstruction ruling) unanimously. Debate: a two way street. People can learn from other people through debate and it can be mutually beneficial to reaching a common ground.
Did I miss any?
Debate is furthermore a subset of activism. Your bias is present in your response.
Getting back to the thread topic. The stated goal of Riot Games' event at PAX West was to "support women and non-binary folks." Did it succeed or did it not? There's a lot of noise surrounding the event but I don't think that question has been answered by Riot Games.
The media shows what it thinks the public wants to see. This hooks directly into activism. An unengaged public is a public of sheep.
I know you are correct from an official "how things should work" perspective ford. But like utopia, that's not the result the real world often gets. Thinga are often influenced by activism, and an engaged public is a GOOD thing.
Take it from someone who was in the media herself:
A lot of people in general are what I would term "activists"
It's a common thing for diners in small towns to become a place where people debate the latest news. Are people that do that activists? They're just passing the time.
I also think anyone can be racist. Not trying to argue you are predisposed to it or anything, just that it can occur. FWIW I doubt it's common in minorities, but we have things as confusing as black KKK members, so go figure.
At any rate, I am out. As I stated earlier, I lost a friend to this conflict, which both biases and upsets me to an emotional degree. I will not be participating further, but do not mistake my lack of participstion for lack of an arguement. There is a conflict here and to deny that is silly.
It reminds me EXACTLY of when someone quits smoking.. and then they start walking around like their crap doesn't stink and they get in everyone's faces about smoking.. it's hyper-vigilance to the point of being a detriment to the cause of getting people to quit.
edit: Ahem! That said, I think a lot of people aren't very culturally monolithic either. So there's just less racism in general these days. A lot of us are growing up juggling multiple worlds now. Not necessarily on the level I mentioned above, but it still somewhat applies.
I wonder how long it will take before people stop hating on other people for stupid reasons that don't even affect them? Looking back, humanity as a whole has come a long way from what it once was, even recently, but we're nowhere near where we should be yet.
I can't really elaborate further, for several reasons, but this wound is still very fresh.
;)
:lovetpu: