Tuesday, November 6th 2018
Intel Announces "Forward-Looking" Architecture Event to be Held December 11th
Intel today announced to press that they've scheduled an event for December 11th. The scheduled event should take the form of a small gathering of both Intel and press professionals, where Intel will be giving insights into its thought process and technologies with some in-depth presentations for technicians and engineers from the blue giant. Intel has become more and more secluded when it comes to the workings and architecture details of its technology advances, with the company even going so far as to cancel the (previously annual) Intel Developer Forums.
The event is apparently focusing on "architecture" considerations for future Intel products, so information shared could be strung with NDAs, and could fall under any product family Intel is working on (CPU, GPU, FPGA, AI...). We'll see what Intel has to share, and what kind of details (or watercolor ideas) can be painted on any future Intel products.
Source:
AnandTech
The event is apparently focusing on "architecture" considerations for future Intel products, so information shared could be strung with NDAs, and could fall under any product family Intel is working on (CPU, GPU, FPGA, AI...). We'll see what Intel has to share, and what kind of details (or watercolor ideas) can be painted on any future Intel products.
25 Comments on Intel Announces "Forward-Looking" Architecture Event to be Held December 11th
In the meantime, We are adding another (+) to our 14nm++++++++
Intel is going to be Intel for sure.
The event be will either some backpedaling towards more superficial architectural internals and 'secrets' (which everybody with a sane mind would've come up with anyway; MCPs) to regain some trust on Wall Street due to increasing pressure from shareholders … Or they'll bring the next stunt of utter bs to calm down the market and investors and how everything is fine and dandy. I guess the latter, as they most probably will sell their termination of their original 10nm process as another breakthrough à la „Hyperscale“.This.
Smartcom
I have a friend who works in sales for Lenovo. According to him the Intel sales team is going "wait and see, stay with us and it'll be really good" and the AMD team is replying with "you can get this right now, we'll improve it as we go"
It sounds to me like Intel is treading water, promising future improvements, whereas AMD is selling what they have, not what they might develop.
sincerely yours, the client from whom you've taken 10 yrs with your products based on lies, dishonesty and deceitfulness
And ironically AMD is trying the 'Intel way' with their GPUs since the last five years, too.
The point being Intel could easily stop this if they wanted to, but why would they? It's not like this is making them look bad.
I'm totally with you on the fact intel could avoid swapping platform so much, but it doesn't even matter if don't switch CPU every generation, i mean i'm with sandy bridge, what should i do? I should pretend to have the same socket or platform or anything? That's a bit stupid isn't it?Edit: Misunderstood the post, sorry
Something tells me that there were
paid orderswords of advices from Intel to explicitly not stay with such official guidelines Intel are ordering.Either way, if they're telling that they „followed Intel's guidelines strictly“, they ain't necessarily lying at all. Since pretty sure they did so en bloc, as obviously as it gets.
The only question which remains being answered, is; Are those guidelines they followed were the same we are think they actually should be …?
C'mon, this obvious fuckery and continuous bribing Intel always did and does since decades – and especially within the younger past since Ryzen it's always the same pattern;
Accidentally AIBs fucking in up (on purpose?!) every single time and with every single launch as they accidentally OC out of the box, accidentally can't get settings like [ICODE]Multi Core-Enhancement[/ICODE] right, accidentally exceed TDP-windows and so on. Accidentally can't manufacture any decent AM4-boards or can't built any decent VRM-designing on AM4-boards or suddenly can't meet any greater demand for it and so on (while even bringing a shitload of even completely dedicated boards to run a Quadcore on a pseudo-HEDT-board. Or that OEMs all out of a sudden just unlearnt to to do any decent and uncrippled notebooks which accidentally just feature AMD-parts (while at the same time identical notebooks featuring Intel-parts can run completely unchained.
Curiously enough it's always everything accidentally, isn't it?
The only fact which continuously remains is, that – whatever they do – accidentally it always just is perfectly suited to let Intel shine (while cheating) and devalue anything with Ryzen (also while cheating).
The thing is, it all bears the hallmarks of Intel, from start to finish. It sports Intel's very way they used to bribe and they always will use to do so.
The sad thing is, that the industry or at least a good chunk of OEMs and AIBs are doing what Intel wants them to do since they always threaten AIBs to withdraw their chipset licences (which they already did back then with the Athlon; while it was on top, no-one could biuld a setup since no boards were made nor shipped) or threaten OEMs to stop supplying them with CPUs for the mobile-market.
It's sad, but that's just they way it is. Until AIBs and OEMs cut their selves off from Intel and their practices and stop joyfully take their filthy money, those OEMs and AIBs will have that AMD-coloured blood on their hands and AMD won't have any greater breakthrough and there won't be any genuine, trustworthy market for the consumer to chose from and no true competition.
Thinking or even believing the whole thing and market wouldn't work that way, is just illusionary. Because every AIB and every single OEM-manufacture is just as guilty as Intel – since it always takes two for a bribery: One who tries to nobble and one who accepts the bribe and takes the money.
Smartcom
Smartcom
Look at the difference in available cash and you might see why Intel sounds a little desperate.