Monday, December 17th 2018
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Could Launch Mid-January
NVIDIA could launch its "RTX for the masses" SKU, the GeForce RTX 2060, sometime mid-January, according to Andreas Schilling. It is also confirmed that the RTX 2060 will feature 6 GB of GDDR6 memory. Schilling confirmed no other specifications of the GPU, but posted official branding for the RTX 2060 SKU. Earlier leaks pin the RTX 2060 as being carved out from the 12 nm "TU106" silicon, with 1,920 CUDA cores, 120 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and a 192-bit wide GDDR6 memory interface, which at 14 Gbps produces a memory bandwidth of 336 GB/s. NVIDIA could target the crowd that wants DXR-enabled gaming at 1080p thru 1440p resolutions.
Source:
Andreas Schilling (Twitter)
30 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Could Launch Mid-January
www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Battlefield_V_Tides_of_War_RTX_DXR_Raytracing/3.html
1440p sounds like a stretch for this card though. (unless you're ok with mid 40's fps)
NVIDIA could launch its "RTX for the masses"
mmm...no such thing this gen in my opinion.
Still, earlier and wider support accelerates adaptation and improvements. Having RTX support in 2060 can't be a bad thing, and remember, it is optional to use it.
2. What is this supposed to be somewhat comparative to from the 1xxx line, a GTX 1070 non-Ti?
3. Price, price, price.
I won't be upgrading my main card, the GTX 1080, in a long while, I can tell you.
What matters is the performance you "need" and the money you are willing to spend.
The RTX 2080 & 2070 both had the same amount of ROP's as the previous gen's price targeted cards (1080 & 1080 Ti). This new 2060 looks like it's going to leave a sizable gap between it and the 2070, as its ROP's are similar to the 1060, not the 1070 that it should be replacing. We have no clue what the price of this card is going to be, but I suspect anywhere from $325-400.
Pointless Yawn, for a pointless product.
Now I'm running a GTX 1060 6GB and I'm a happy camper.
People have really gotten spoiled. The improvements in Turing is not bad in historical perspective.
If you want to talk about pointless, look at RX 590…