Friday, January 4th 2019

LG to Introduce the 27GL850G "UltraGear" Monitor: 160 Hz, WQHD, Nano IPS, G-Sync

In yet another entry to LG's (still upcoming) UltraGear lineup of gaming monitors, the curtains have been shoved aside for the 27GL850G to make its first appearance. While49" and 38" monitors are all well and good, and LG does have the specs on them to make them attractive buying options, some users don't really like to have that big a black mirror in front of them. And that's where the 27" diagonal of the LG 27GL850G comes in handy.

The panel is of the Nano IPS type, with a 2560 x 1440 (WQHD) resolution and support for a 160 Hz refresh rate (after overclocking, via the embedded OSD, from the native 144 Hz ). NVIDIA G-SYNC is present, supporting a variable refresh rate range of 30 - 160Hz. A 1000:1 static contrast ratio, 178° horizontal and vertical viewing angles, and a flicker-free enhanced phosphor backlight round out the specs.It's expected that the 27GL850G, via its Nano IPS tech, covers ~98% DCI-P3 (~135%) color space. Red LED lighting is present on the back of the monitor. A VESA mount is present, and tilt, height and pivot adjustments are possible. 1x DP, 1x HDMI, 2x USB 3.0 ports (with fast-charging - plus 1x USB 3.0 upstream port), a 3.5mm headphone jack and DC power input (external power brick) are present as well.
Sources: LG, via PC Monitors
Add your own comment

77 Comments on LG to Introduce the 27GL850G "UltraGear" Monitor: 160 Hz, WQHD, Nano IPS, G-Sync

#76
PanicLake
bugThen why did you feel the need to emphasize this may not be "true" 1ms? I mean, I can understand a warning for a monitor that may not be "true" 6 or 7ms, but at 1ms, true or not it's fast enough for everything you care to throw at it anyway.
I thought you get it on your own...
Because if it does average 4-5ms or even more and occasionally a lowest 1ms but also has 6-10ms highest, it is false advertising and you still probably experiencing ghosting at 160hz.
For example the LG 34GK950F is advertised for 5ms G2G response time. When tested by tftcentral, they reported: Lowest 3.8, average 8.2 and highest 16.5. As you can understand you can't do decent 144hz without ghosting and stuff with 8.2 average, but they advertise it as a 5ms anyway.
Posted on Reply
#77
bug
GinoLatinoI thought you get it on your own...
Because if it does average 4-5ms or even more and occasionally a lowest 1ms but also has 6-10ms highest, it is false advertising and you still probably experiencing ghosting at 160hz.
For example the LG 34GK950F is advertised for 5ms G2G response time. When tested by tftcentral, they reported: Lowest 3.8, average 8.2 and highest 16.5. As you can understand you can't do decent 144hz without ghosting and stuff with 8.2 average, but they advertise it as a 5ms anyway.
So max is about 3x the advertised response time. Make that 4x and 1ms becomes 4ms. My point stands.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 2nd, 2025 00:45 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts