Tuesday, April 30th 2019

Intel to Use 5-digit Processor Model Numbering with 10th Gen?

A lot of us could be wondering how Intel could number its client-segment processors after the i9-9980XE, or the 9th generation Core in general, and hoping for a major branding change or at least a change in the model numbering scheme. It turns out, Intel will brazen it out with a 5-digit model number and stick to the current scheme. Going by this scheme, the successor to the Core i7-9700K could be the Core i7-10700K, for example. Intel jumped from 3-digit to 4-digit as it transitioned from 1st gen Core to 2nd gen as it ran out of 3-digit numbers with the Core i7-9xx. It's now running out of 4-digit numbers.

Evidence of 5-digit number surfaced when Thai enthusiast TUM_Apisak tweeted a screenshot of a UL Benchmarks Systeminfo page describing an unreleased Core i5-10210U, which is probably a mobile processor based on the 10 nm "Ice Lake-U" silicon slated for late-2019. With a nominal clock-speed of 1.60 GHz and "reported" speed of 2.10 GHz, the Turbo Boost frequency of this 4-core/8-thread chip is rated at almost 3.80 GHz. Japanese enthusiast Komachi Ensaka confirmed this with three other model numbers: i3-10110U, i5-10510U, and i7-10710U.
Add your own comment

32 Comments on Intel to Use 5-digit Processor Model Numbering with 10th Gen?

#26
sutyi
SteevoUnbelievable, either these models have no cache, or turn off all other cores and their cache to reach boost speeds over 4Ghz, perhaps believable if they were talking about 3nm production that's mature.
These are just Boost Clocks, clock range should hover around the 2.0-2.2GHz mark at best considering these things thermal throttle fastre then you can say Gigahertz.
Posted on Reply
#27
Ubersonic
Reminds me of the pre-Pentium days.

80286, 80386, 80486, etc :)
Posted on Reply
#28
Caring1
Perhaps less confusing would be a naming scheme based on lithography and starting with that followed by other identifying numbers.
At least then we would know if we are getting the latest or just a rehash.
Posted on Reply
#29
lemonadesoda
dorsetknob( i once had a 8086 laptop).
no you didnt!
Posted on Reply
#30
dorsetknob
"YOUR RMA REQUEST IS CON-REFUSED"
lemonadesodano you didnt!
in fact yes i did!
Posted on Reply
#31
lemonadesoda
dorsetknobin fact yes i did!
Luggable maybe, what was it? But not a laptop! Something like this?

Posted on Reply
#32
juiseman
The first Laptop???

Nice find man...
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 19th, 2024 14:22 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts