Monday, October 14th 2019
TP-LINK Launches the Archer AX10 Wi-Fi 6 Router for Under €100
TP-LINK has made available through retailers a budget Wi-Fi router that promises to slightly democratize the ax protocol for the masses. The new Archer AX10 seems to be no slouch in terms of bang for the buck: it's a Wi-Fi 6-enabled router that packs most technologies you'd be looking for from a standard user point of view. There's support for beamforming technology so that the signal is focused towards the devices that are actually connected to the router (which are balanced via OFDMA tech, meaning the router can better handle simultaneous connections), improving signal strength and reducing interference. Thanks to that and the pure speeds of the ax protocol, the AX10 can provide signal speeds of up to 1201 Mb/s on the 5 GHz band. A quad antenna design serves to ensure ample coverage and signal integrity.
The AX10 has a triple core ARM processor operating at 1.5 GHz, aided by 256 MB of RAM and 16 MB of flash memory for the firmware. 4x Gigabit Ethernet ports and 1x WAN connection that also delivers a maximum speed of 1 Gigabit should enable most of the wired connections you need. And best of all: the router will be available for less than €100.
Sources:
TP-LINK, via NL.Hardware.Info
The AX10 has a triple core ARM processor operating at 1.5 GHz, aided by 256 MB of RAM and 16 MB of flash memory for the firmware. 4x Gigabit Ethernet ports and 1x WAN connection that also delivers a maximum speed of 1 Gigabit should enable most of the wired connections you need. And best of all: the router will be available for less than €100.
18 Comments on TP-LINK Launches the Archer AX10 Wi-Fi 6 Router for Under €100
While TP Link devices get warm they have yet to shut down on me as a result of the heat, even when enclosed in a slightly ventilated cupboard.
This is potentially the best option for my next router upgrade (I'm already kinda dissapointed in my RT-AC1200). I don't think that was an issue since 941N and such.
Sad thing is that regardless of how "fast" or powerful your router may be or what protocols it works on, your connection will only ever be as fast as the slowest component in the chain, which currently is what ever connection speed your ISP gives you..... which in most normal, consumer-level services, is limited to 1 Gigabyte......
www.broadcom.com/products/wireless/wireless-lan-infrastructure/bcm6750 You know TP-Link is one of the worst when it comes to not supporting their devices with software updates, right?
It's also unlikely we'll see open source support for these things for quite some time.
4 × 1000/100/10 Mbps LAN Ports
Some nice internal pics here.
fccid.io/TE7AX10/Internal-Photos/10-Internal-Photos-4370794.iframe
Just look at small-business solutions - some have upwards of 4GB RAM installed even for small 20-client networks, and its all used when AV and content filter is enabled. The software solution we previously used at work became so heavy, that it required at least a dual-core modern CPU w/ AVX support, and no less than 8GB RAM. A triple-core ARMv7 is nothing. My $20 chinese mini-PC has nearly double the compute power and 8 times more RAM (considering it's almost 4 years old). If anything, I'll probably be mad that it has so little compute resources... So do many others, but from the consumer standpoint they are a lot more user-friendly and ready to go out-of-the-box. And, most importantly, one of the cheapest.
I think in my region you'll be more likely to see something like TP-Link, Xiaomi or Netis in someone's house, rather than overpriced ASUS (which may have a good software support, but has many hardware flaws on the low-end). If anything, normal people are scared of updates on their magic boxes, so they'll never touch it anyways. As for me, I'll definitely flash something more interesting on it.
Look at D-Link and Asus...
I admit I have some TP-Link gear, but none of it is facing the internet.
The manufacturers are starting to add automagic updates to their devices, which I hope most people will use for routers.
I think you just got a crap router, as in a badly made one.
I got an R7800 with a Qualcomm IPQ8065 which is a dual core 1.7GHz chip and it has no issues whatsoever.
Considering that the BCM4709XX is in something like 50% of mid to high-end 802.11ac routers, it can't be having too many issues.
Looking at the design of that router though, it seems like Netgear put the heatsink on the bottom of the router, which is a bit weird, I guess that doesn't really help with heat dissipation.
The only real saving grace here is i paid about $70 for it
But as I pointed out, different cooling design, different hardware, so not a fair comparison.
I lost interest in Linksys after the WRT54GS I had was a potato.
But yeah, never an issue from tp-Link
I have a house FULL of smart devices, but I do offload some of the work that the WiFi AP has to do by having a second AP at the other end of the house.
I'm running DD-WRT on my R7000, so that might be why I don't get overheating.
I'm looking forward to faster consumer wi-fi, but in general, I try to go wired for any b/w heavy devices.
I've used tp-link before for switches and APs. I've never had a problem with them and the APs I have can be loaded with DD-WRT. The only reason I took them out of my network is because I upgraded.