Monday, April 27th 2020
Intel Core i3-10300 and i3-10100 Cinebench Scores Surface, Compared with Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100
Intel is giving finishing touches to its 10th generation Core i3 desktop processors based on the "Comet Lake" microarchitecture. These upcoming socket LGA1200 processors are 4-core/8-thread, and see the debut of HyperThreading and Turbo Boost technologies to the Core i3 desktop processor brand extension. The i3-10100 is an entry-level part clocked at 3.60 GHz with 4.30 GHz boost; while the i3-10300 is clocked higher with 3.70 GHz nominal and 4.40 GHz boost frequency. The TDP of both parts is rated at 65 W. Besides clock speeds, the two parts are differentiated with L3 cache amount, with the i3-10100 featuring 6 MB, and the i3-10300 featuring 8 MB. Cinebench R20 scores of the two chips were leaked to the web by CPU-Monkey.
The i3-10100 reportedly scores 448 points in the single-thread, and 2284 points in the multi-threaded test. The i3-10300, on the other hand, scores 457 points in the single-threaded test, and 2330 points in the multi-threaded test. The same source also claims to have tested the upcoming 3rd generation AMD Ryzen 3 "Matisse" 4-core/8-thread processor series, with the Ryzen 3 3100 scoring 444 points single-thread and 2154 points multi-threaded; and the Ryzen 3 3300X scoring 491 points single-thread, and 2341 points multi-threaded. If these scores hold true, it's game on between the two companies' entry-level chips.
Source:
3DCenter.org
The i3-10100 reportedly scores 448 points in the single-thread, and 2284 points in the multi-threaded test. The i3-10300, on the other hand, scores 457 points in the single-threaded test, and 2330 points in the multi-threaded test. The same source also claims to have tested the upcoming 3rd generation AMD Ryzen 3 "Matisse" 4-core/8-thread processor series, with the Ryzen 3 3100 scoring 444 points single-thread and 2154 points multi-threaded; and the Ryzen 3 3300X scoring 491 points single-thread, and 2341 points multi-threaded. If these scores hold true, it's game on between the two companies' entry-level chips.
24 Comments on Intel Core i3-10300 and i3-10100 Cinebench Scores Surface, Compared with Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100
The 3300x ST is really high, I guess the single CCX is to blame?
Personally, I feel at the low end, Intel has got no chance to compete in terms of value because they adamantly disallow people to overclock on non K series chips, and non Z series motherboard. If the results are close at stock, Intel chips will not be able to catch up with an overclocked Ryzen 3xxx, even on a budget B450 motherboard.
Ryzen 3 1200 (4C/4T) - 333 | 1191 www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-amd_ryzen_3_1200-713
Ryzen 3 1300X (4C/4T) - 360 | 1357 www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-amd_ryzen_3_1300x-712
Core i7-7700K with its 2257 sits right between Ryzen 5 1500X (4C/8T) 1811 189$ and Ryzen 5 1600 (6C/12T) 2501 219$.
www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-intel_core_i7_7700k-664
www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-amd_ryzen_5_1500x-709
www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu-amd_ryzen_5_1600-758
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Ryzen_microprocessors#CPUs_2
But first generation Ryzen 5 1600 still slashed Core i7-7700K pricing by 35%.
Unless your on about the security part which is looking more like a sieve every year that passes.
Intel plays its cards badly to this day.
I guess they didn't expect the first generation Ryzen lineup to be that competitive, and Intel's scouting/intelligence failed.
The same with Nvidia - when Nvidia released the RTX 2080 Ti, AMD countered with Radeon R9 230.
Even the cheapest AMD cooler (The Wraith Stealth) has more metal than Intel's cooler and a better/quieter fan. People on really tight budgets can get by with AMD's Wraith Stealth but only the most desperate person will put with an Intel boxed cooler. Throttling is all but guaranteed and they're loud for anything except idle. With the cheapest althernatives to Intel's boxed coolers being in the $20 range, that's an extra cost advantage that Intel need to match.