Monday, May 18th 2020

Asetek Unveils Rad Card Industry's First Slot-In PCIe Radiator Card

Asetek, the creator of the all-in-one (AIO) liquid cooler and the global leader in liquid cooling solutions for gaming PCs and DIY enthusiasts, today announced its Rad Card GPU Cooler, bringing liquid cooled GPUs to space constrained PC cases. Asetek's Rad Card GPU Cooler, the industry's first slot-in PCIe radiator card, is first available in Dell-Alienware's newly introduced Alienware Aurora R11 PC.

Space concerns are a real issue for PC manufacturers, leaving GPU air cooling as the only option, until now. Asetek took this challenge head-on, innovating a new approach to radiator technology that reimagines the shape and location of the radiator. The Asetek Rad Card GPU Cooler fits into your motherboard's PCIe slot, just like any other add-in card. By utilizing PCIe slots, Asetek has defined a way to overcome PC manufacturers' dilemma of finding additional space inside the case for a liquid cooled GPU heat exchanger (HEx).

Update May 18th: This card may not be limited to just OEMs with Asetek tweeting "Not all of them made it to Alienware. Not what to do with these...". Asetek is very open about seeking feedback and is watching demand for this product from consumers, possibly even getting ready for a giveaway so it will be exciting to see what comes from this.
The unique design of Asetek's Rad Card GPU Cooler provides numerous benefits:
  • Space: Rad Card enables a liquid cooled GPU in a chassis where space is constrained, while leaving room for a liquid cooled CPU in the same case.
  • Performance: In space constrained PC cases, Rad Card provides superior cooling over an air-cooled GPU, ensuring GPU stability and limiting thermal throttling.
  • Aesthetics: Rad Card eliminates the hassle and clutter of tube routing for a clean and sparse system environment.
"When Alienware approached us to develop a solution to enable GPU cooling in space constrained cases, we were up for the challenge," said John Hamill, Chief Operating Officer at Asetek. "The result is a completely redesigned approach to GPU cooling."
Sources: Asetek, @Asetek
Add your own comment

59 Comments on Asetek Unveils Rad Card Industry's First Slot-In PCIe Radiator Card

#51
Chrispy_
AssimilatorAsetek, how 'bout you put these in the trash
These products work just fine, they serve a purpose that few competitors have solutions for, they are an option that add choice to the market without taking anything away from the market. Only an idiot would disagree with that.
Assimilator...the trash, the same place that your patents belong?
Now we can agree. Asetek should be slandered with all the malice and hate they deserve for what is clearly 'a dick move' to the industry and consumers alike.
Posted on Reply
#52
trom89
Can you imagine the sag on those poor boards?

btw only ATX boards have 5+ slots
Posted on Reply
#53
claes
When will we abandon ATX? You’d think Dell would just make a custom PCB...
Posted on Reply
#54
gamefoo21
claesWhen will we abandon ATX? You’d think Dell would just make a custom PCB...
Technically we've tried it's called BTX...

The DIY market reacted with absolute hatred and... BTX is basically only OEM and uncommon.

ATX lives on... :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#55
claes
gamefoo21Technically we've tried it's called BTX...

The DIY market reacted with absolute hatred and... BTX is basically only OEM and uncommon.

ATX lives on... :laugh:
Ah, yes — I remember seeing samples that my dad’s friend was looking at back then! He didn’t like it either, but I don’t remember why. Looking at it now it looks like an advancement over ATX too me... What was the hatred about (besides the wonky CPU cooling :p)?

Still, without a NB/SB, with most users only needing one (really, zero) expansion slots, where most desktop users who do need those slots only really need cooling for 2 of those devices, where desktops are becoming obsolete for most of the market, where itx and ribbon cables are the l33t thing now, etc, we could really be doing better for cooling (and probably integrated devices, but I don’t know anything about that).
Posted on Reply
#56
Valantar
claesAh, yes — I remember seeing samples that my dad’s friend was looking at back then! He didn’t like it either, but I don’t remember why. Looking at it now it looks like an advancement over ATX too me... What was the hatred about (besides the wonky CPU cooling :p)?

Still, without a NB/SB, with most users only needing one (really, zero) expansion slots, where most desktop users who do need those slots only really need cooling for 2 of those devices, where desktops are becoming obsolete for most of the market, where itx and ribbon cables are the l33t thing now, etc, we could really be doing better for cooling (and probably integrated devices, but I don’t know anything about that).
Replacing a standard that entrenched is near impossible. Either the new standard must be backwards compatible (mounting holes, I/O and expansion slot locations) or every single case design in the world would need retooling to fit it. Retooling a case costs anywhere from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollar. Per design. The case industry would also need to learn how to make cases for the new standard at similar costs to ATX, while also allowing for airflow etc., which would take ages (and likely bankrupt most of them before they ever got there). The same of course goes for all OEMs designing their own cases, though the concern is smaller for them due to higher sales volumes and margins (except for the ones who outsource case design to case makers, of course).

And of course lack of a wide selection of compelling compatible cases would make adoption of the motherboards near nonexistent, meaning the cases wouldn't sell, meaning even fewer people would buy the cases... and there you have what happened to BTX.

The good thing about all this is that an ATX replacement is largely unnecessary these days. ITX is compatible and sufficient for >99% of PCs out there, and its smaller size allows for more varied case designs and form factors. A possible improvement would be some sort of mix of DTX and mATX to allow for four RAM slots and two PCIe while allowing for smaller cases than mATX, though I highly doubt anything like that will ever happen given that it would be a niche market competing with three well established alternatives.
Posted on Reply
#57
Chrispy_
The only thing that ruins so many mITX cases is the unnecessary pandering to the "must-have-mutliple-radiators-and-a-window-to-see-all-the-watercooling" crowd - making mITX cases almost entirely full of empty space and ruining the single most important role of mITX - to occupy as little space as possible.

In theory, my ideea mITX case is as small as reasonably possible to accommodate an mITX boad and top-flow air cooler, an SFX PSU and a typical 10.5" dual-slot GPU. Given the height of a PCIe card, it's pretty much guaranteed to also have space for a 3.5" or a couple of 2.5" drives too.
Posted on Reply
#58
svan71
ZoneDymoermm its specifically for those people though, those that dont know nor care about the inside, they just want a "badass gaming pc" and that is it.
My friend bought one of those "bad ass gaming pc's" Paid $4500 for a 1st gen threadripper. Dell never updated the bios to support 2ND gen much less 3RD cpus. Its big its ugly inside and out and loud.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 23:51 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts