Thursday, January 14th 2021
MSI, ASUS Z590 Motherboard Lineup Surface; MSI Models up to €999, ASUS up to €1516
The Z590 motherboard lineups for both MSI and ASUS have just released and... They are interesting, to say the least. MSI will have as many as 12 different motherboard solutions, with the top one, the über-high-end MEG Z590 GODLIKE, retailing for as much as €999 ($1019). The MEG GODLIKE has faced a deep redesign compared to its predecessor, and there are two new MEG products directly under it - the MEG Z590 ACE and MEG Z590 UNIFY which are priced in a slightly less outrageous way (€479 for the MEG ACE, €379 for the MEG UNIFY). The cheapest MSI option stands as the Z590-A PRO, as €189.
As for ASUS, well... Things are looking pricey as well throughout its 13 models. The company's flagship model Z590 ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME GLACIAL will go for a cool, not-at-all-collected €1516 (but that pricing does include a custom liquid-cooling monoblock designed in collaboration with EK). Descend a couple of steps down the ASUS product line ladder and you'll find the ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME (€960) and the ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO/APEX motherboards for €505. The cheapest ASUS motherboard mimics MSI's pricing at €189; for those euros, you'll snag yourself a PRIME Z590M-PLUS motherboard (check ASUS' entire lineup after the break). Is it just me, or it's getting pricier to keep DIY desktop construction as a hobby?
Sources:
ASUS, MSI
As for ASUS, well... Things are looking pricey as well throughout its 13 models. The company's flagship model Z590 ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME GLACIAL will go for a cool, not-at-all-collected €1516 (but that pricing does include a custom liquid-cooling monoblock designed in collaboration with EK). Descend a couple of steps down the ASUS product line ladder and you'll find the ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME (€960) and the ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO/APEX motherboards for €505. The cheapest ASUS motherboard mimics MSI's pricing at €189; for those euros, you'll snag yourself a PRIME Z590M-PLUS motherboard (check ASUS' entire lineup after the break). Is it just me, or it's getting pricier to keep DIY desktop construction as a hobby?
- ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME GLACIAL - €1516 - Available Q1 / 2021
- ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME - €960 - Available Q1 / 2021
- ROG MAXIMUS XIII HERO - €505 - Available End of February 2021
- ROG MAXIMUS XIII APEX - €505 - Available Q1 / 2021
- ROG STRIX Z590-E GAMING WIFI - €378 - Available End of February 2021
- ROG STRIX Z590-F GAMING WIFI - €341- Available End of February 2021
- ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI - €328 - Available End of February 2021
- ROG STRIX Z590-I GAMING WIFI - €378 - Available Q1 / 2021
- PRIME Z590-A - €277 - Available End of February 2021
- TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI - €252 - Available End of February 2021
- TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS - €239 - Available Q1 / 2021
- PRIME Z590-P - €201 - Available Q1 / 2021
- PRIME Z590M-PLUS - €189 - Available Q1 / 202
50 Comments on MSI, ASUS Z590 Motherboard Lineup Surface; MSI Models up to €999, ASUS up to €1516
I get that, as someone eluded to earlier with the bugatti reference, paying 3 million for a car is completely crazy (unless your a wealthy car enthusiast like Jay Leno) but you can't really compare a motherboard to a car, because unlike motherboards, a great many cars actually INCREASE in value over time, while motherboards slowly become obsolete.
I honestly have no words to describe the prices for these motherboards. I do have some advice for prospective buyers of Intel though: Stick with Z490. Research which companies make boards that have the hardware to run PCIe 4.0 (clock generators and such) if 4.0 is something you REALLY need. If not, just buy whatever Z490 board you wish and pop in a Rocket Lake CPU. But for the love of god, don't encourage these prices by paying them for what is, for all intents and purposes, a mainstream segment. HEDT boards don't even cost as much as the Extreme/Extreme Glacial or Godlike, for fuck's sake!
or since rocket lake is 14nm,
Similiar to all GPU,CPU that most normal people buy...
just buy a cheap last gen motherboard+cpu and call it a day
Anyway, these prices just push me farther towards getting a 10700K while they are still plentiful and cheap.
But with all the price inflation across the board in everything from lumber to computer chips, I'm starting to wonder if the issue isn't much broader and deeper than just the PC / computer industry. Even gas is starting to go up rapidly.
All this money printing and people staying at home might just be kicking off some big price inflation.
€1500 translates to CAD $2300. No way, I'll ever pay that much for a board and then add a $600 CPU. This is madness!!
I'll stick to my X99 Mpower with my 6850K OC to 4.7 and wait for another round. And I hope they don't sell many boards, so they have to scale back their pricing.
The chipset is still somewhere >14nm, the capacitors and stuff are still mostly the same they use for 5+ years and the production technology improved over the last 10+ years massively, this should have at least lead to a roughly same price-range over the last years. But the top-notch boards increased from 400€ to 500€ and now to 999€ without offering really much more than you got 5 years ago.
What changed massively? A new USB and PCI-E type. But still not more PCIe-slots, usb-ports or anything. x79 boards already had 1 m.2 slot. x99 boards offered up to 2 m.2 x4 slots already and up to 10 sata-3 ports. None of the boards shown here has anything that much different, but especially for asus it's not understandable why a regular STRIX board (yes, those are still "regular" to me, as they are just the upper middle class while the Maximus series was the "high end" series) starts at >300€ where in the past the high end started and except a few very specific boards it ended at around 500€.
I see no reason (not even corvid related) why mid-range boards are valued now at double the price they were 5 years ago. MSI / Asus / Gigabyte Z170 series was between 150 and 250€ for mid-range boards, 300+ for upper class and ended at 550/600 for the "ultimate" versions like he Z270 Maximus from Asus at around 600€ which already created an outrage - and comparing that Z270 board to the "new" Z590 board….. I don't see much more we get here. No "superb design" or technological marvel validating double the price (the Z270 maximus already had a very nice design, good cooling, good power stages/phases, similar amount of usb/sata/etc. connectivity and so on....) for a >900€ board, let alone the 1500€ board with the mono-block …..
2020: Motherboard which costs 1500
Most people need to be able to purchase these parts at normal prices because money is tight, this will enable them to work from home or stay entertained but struggle to do so now because of these imbecilic prices they have set. :roll:
I'm still rocking my x99 godlike and features that i thought i wouldn't be using comes in handy today
top of the line Mb shouldn't skimp out on features.
on a side note i saw a pic where it seemed like a 3rd pcie was there but covered
Still, multiple PCI-e slots are heading the way of the dinosaur as single GPU seems to be the future being forced upon us and everything else is built in.
See Image below. The B560 has moved decidedly upscale. Gigabyte now has a 12+1 power stage VRM on its B560M Aorus Elite, which is better than any of the low end Z490s. The lowly DS3H B560 is now 6+2 while the old B460 was 4+2.
And the Z590, there's not really a direct comparison to previous gen boards there. WiFi 6E and some other connectivity upgrades are there, but the VRMs on these new boards... holy crap. The *lowest end* Asus Z590 Prime has 14+2 power stages. That compares to 8+1 for the Z490. I have the Z490 Prime, so comparing some features - 8+1 vs 14+2 power, 1Gbit Intel Ethernet vs 2.5Gbit ethernet, Dual M.2 on both (but PCIe 4 on the Z590), dual M.2 heatsinks on Z590 vs no m.2 heatsinks on Z490, Thunderbolt 4 header on Z590 Prim vs no thunderbolt on Z490 Prime,
So no, this stuff isn't quite the same.
The B560 / H570 are more comparable to the prior gen Z490s.
B560 supporting DDR4-4000 :
Prime Z590 with better VRM, 2.5Gbit Ethernet, thunderbolt 4 headers :
Wow, that's totally new and not what should be expected, right? Because why would a new generation have new functions compared to the last one?!
And the power stages are a "very bad example". Why do they have those?
A) Look at the reviews of the last year …. Most entry level boards hat MASSIVE issues with power delivery (even not-oced), overheating VRM's or even cpu's which went into power-lock far below their general multi-core frequency because the board couldn't handle them.
B) the "power hunger" of the last few intel chips (which should have been 10nm for some time but got back-portet again and again to 14+++++++++++++++² nm more than once) grew massively. The new generation will not be less demanding than the last and the producers don't want to run into the same issues as stated in A)
C) VRM's are one of the more expensive elements on the board, besides the grams of copper inside the PCB and the licencing & purchase costs for the chipset, I get that - but again, the board overall still isn't more expensive than 50€, at most. Add another 50€ for production energy costs, labor and someone designing those fabulous packages they ship in and you should be good. Everything on top is overhead and a split revenue between the company producing them, the retailer and the shipping company (in unequal amounts of course). So listing VRM's as a good reason, why upper mid-range-boards went from 150-200€ to a starting point of >300€ is a very bad example :D