Thursday, June 24th 2021
Microsoft Account and Internet Connection Mandatory for Windows 11 Home Setup
Windows 11 Home setup will require you to have a Microsoft account and a working Internet connection handy. "Windows 11 Home edition requires internet connectivity and a Microsoft Account to complete device setup on first use," lists Microsoft as part of the operating system's requirements. In addition, all editions of Windows 11 will require Internet connection to receive updates, and a Microsoft Account for some tasks. "For all Windows 11 editions, internet access is required to perform updates and to download and take advantage of some features. A Microsoft account is required for some features," it adds. The requirement for Internet makes sense as Microsoft will be using Windows Update as the main medium of distributing Windows 11. It will be offered as a free upgrade for existing Windows 10 users.
Source:
The Verge
150 Comments on Microsoft Account and Internet Connection Mandatory for Windows 11 Home Setup
Yep godaddy lol but you'll likely get tagged as a spammer :-)
Really doesn't matter seeing neither are ms accounts lol
Tablet sales are growing:
Worldwide Tablet Market Shares, 1Q21: After Recording Hypergrowth for Most of 2020, the Tablet Market in the New Year Continued to Ride the Wave (idc.com)
Worldwide Tablet Shipments Return to Growth in 2020, Fueled by Unprecedented Demand, according to IDC
Canalys: Surging tablet sales offset desktop PC declines in Q2 2020 | VentureBeat
and Hybrids don't outsell them, but this sudden growth also coincide with the moment that tablet stopped being bigger phones and started to have and an interface and apps of their own.
this doesn't look like a failing market to me:
I mean...:D
Microsoft Open Source | Microsoft Open Source
I remember people saying that GitHub is doomed when Microsoft bought them...the Tech world is still scarred by the Gates/Ballmer era, but I honestly feel like Microsoft has become softer. I mean a linux subsystem inside Windows?
Just to be clear, I'm merely explaining the reasoning as to why Microsoft hasn't just been selling a glorified Windows 2000 for decades, computers aren't just a nerd affair anymore, the world into which win 2000 was born and the world right now are quite different, so they had to adapt and cater to a mainstream audience...But I'm not saying that make a perfect job at it ( I still think that people are sometimes going overboard with the criticism, there's a lot of admin tools that I can't uninstall and that I have no use for, but I'm not mad about them ) The issue is that unlike macOS who's really focused on their target, windows is schizophrenic visually and functionally.
macOS was always meant to be mainstream, simple, and ready to use for most common task out of the box with their bundled software. That was always the pitch, and that was always why people bought macs. Windows background is different, it's complex, you had so much control over it that you could break it if you were careless or went too hard with the optimizer tools :D. It's the "default" OS because the computers are cheap, most programs and games are there, but windows itself isn't really "sexy". Alternative ISO, and tools always tried to make the base Windows better
Now Windows is trying to be like macOS, an OS that a mainstream user won't feel the need to enhance so much...some stuffs are good like the multi desktop, the clipboard history...but they are still oblivious to tabs in the explorer, being able to have a quick look at a file when pressing space, or colors and tags for folders, but are doing weird niche things like paint 3D, or how they don't implement video screen recording into the snapshot tool, but don't tell you that the xbox shortcut can record the whole screen, not just games, so you don't actually need OBS for that.
When people are saying that a version of windows was good, they just meant that it wasn't bugged, or offensive, and they were still installing add-ons to make the basic experience better. That's why I'm considering that the intent to add new functionalities isn't bad, but the windows team need to really focus on productivity tools first and entertainment later. Right now macOS looks like a more serious OS when it's supposed to be the funny one
I agree that they should have kept the beta testing, but people don't daily drive beta version, beta testing is good to see how people react to new things, find bugs, but it's not great to see how people use windows on a day-to-day basis for their main usages. And beta testers are still a small data set who tends to be tech savvy
Why iPod Batteries Come Fully Charged: How Your Design Wins Customers (entrepreneurship.org)
Most of the stuff that I'm saying are coming from books that I've read about UX design, and my studies in post grad digital design, we had a whole course about how gathering data is important to make a product, but there's isn't a perfect way to do it, you either got methods that generate small amounts of data, and can be dishonest, since people knows that they are being tested, so they act in a different manner, or methods that are invasive, but really effective and truthful.
Also, if MS wanted to make a good looking OS, they could have made 2000 into most visually stunning OS possible. Windows 11 is just a a bit naff and not really great for all. It tries to satisfy the audience that isn't here and it alienate the ones that have always been there. I was writing about Microsoft not testing new released and updates properly inside and offloading that to noob that have no idea why their computer acts weird.www.techrepublic.com/blog/five-apps/five-tips-for-extending-lithium-ion-battery-life/
"If a lithium-ion battery is discharged below 2.5 volts per cell, a safety circuit built into the battery opens and the battery appears to be dead. The original charger will be of no use. Only battery analyzers with the boost function have a chance of recharging the battery."
"Unlike NiCad batteries, lithium-ion batteries do not have a charge memory. That means deep-discharge cycles are not required. In fact, it's better for the battery to use partial-discharge cycles."
Sorry mate, but it looks like a technical reason why lithium batteries don't come completely discharged. Perhaps people loved that too, but the reason to switch was purely technical.
You don't like mac osx and that's okay, my sister doesn't either. But there are still industries that would use macOS over windows. MacOS settings are simpler than the cluster F that Microsoft did with the new panel settings. (I meant mainstream in the sense that macOS doesn't cater to the hardcore user, but as you said yourself the "tech illiterate". What you see as a downside, is a quality for some) Yup, most android tablets died because they never managed to make the bigger real estate of the tablet useful once phones started to get bigger. Samsung and Apple are the only two who did, and they are the one who are dominating the market. Well of course, the Linux subsystem, is for developers, I never said that it was a mainstream killer feature, but it's something that the old Microsoft wouldn't have done, they would have kept trying to crush any form of competition.
The world is different because tech illiterate, and Karen are required to have a computer. I don't know where you come from, but in France there's a lot of administrative tasks that are now 100% dematerialized and mandatory. But those people are also cheap, and want to spend the least amount of money on a computer... Apple doesn't do "cheap", so there's Windows. Every time that Microsoft is seeing someone who want them to adhere to the hardcore nerd ideology, what they are seeing is less money, so there's always going to be a conflict.
Although you could argue that Windows workstation and enterprise still having a tablet mode is a joke...I guess that win 10 is coded in a way where getting rid of some stuff could potentially compromise the system :confused: It's an odd decision because windows for workstation could have taken a place in the VFX industry where Linux is traditionally preferred for the cost, the customizability, and the sheer speed of the OS, but ho well. (Maya, substance painter, nuke, renderman are programs who are natively available on Linux, but windows could have enjoyed the edge of having access to the adobe suite, zbrush etc...)
Well, my bad, looks like Tony Fadell is a liar. The guy literally said that it was a conscious decision made for the customer, and he's being quoted in UX/product design/innovation books because of that:mad:
Guess that you can't even trust what some engineers are saying nowadays.
Would you like to rethink your statement? Because this seems like more of the same cut-throat bullshit to me...
But every time that I had to use a mac for my internship I didn't have much to complain about, but most of what I do require the adobe suite and transferring images and videos (granted they were still using El Capitan, I don't think that I used the lasted versions)
I do know that macs were never popular in engineering fields due to lack of software support, but they tend to enjoy better support for design software (which also tends to become less and less true, Sketch is the only big name that I know of that made a Windows version, and there's the people who refuse to use something else beyond final cut and Logic Pro X)
Ahh fair enough, I forgot those rugged tablets, but for illustrators, there's a glaring issue, with the tablet mode : it doesn't work with multiscreen, and it's not uncommon to use a secondary screen to display references,
I have a kamvas 13, so I tried to use it, the tablet mode is manly showing a new start menu and rework multitasking a bit, IMHO it doesn't make up for the lack of multiscreen in graphic work... I have a hunch that this is exactly why they said that win11 new taskbar/start menu was made with touch device in mind, the current tablet mode feels so limited...it feels like that was the plan all along
Even the galaxy tab s7 can do it
GalaxyTab/comments/k45db4 Softer to the competition, nowadays, you're only hearing of Microsoft pushing their agenda onto their customers, instead of how Microsoft is trying to crush the opposition with questionable practice, or ruin the legacy of a once legendary company. Nokia was the last victim that I can remember...
Generally in my country perception of Macs is very poor. Most people aren't even aware of what they are, others actively hate them and think that only fools or rich people buy them and there is super tiny niche that actually buys them and then it's a Macbook, never ever an iMac or Mac mini. And even those people that have Macs some of them have a habit of stating that they do and that they are Mac people. So from this assertion we end up with rich hipsters buying Macs. Oh and most of them are also middle aged males. So middle-aged rich male hipsters, probably in mid-life crisis XD. Oh well, my field is Environmental Sciences, but I end up having some courses from other fields. I already had Media Art, Photography, Media Studies. A bit ironically, most Mac that I saw were from social sciences. My specific courses were mostly theory and didn't really require computer much, so that might be why I never saw them. Oh well, I thought that Tablet Mode was somewhat more useful for actual tablet. I remember trying out Windows 8 or 8.1 tablets in shops and they were actually pretty cool. However, on desktop that same Windows just didn't quite work, although it looked really cool.
I mean, typing a quick "hi, how are ya" on Messenger is ok, but I couldn't type this post without my PC and its physical keyboard. I guess this is a contributing factor towards the world devolving into pseudo-communicating "lol-wtf-brb" monkeys - people just can't type proper messages because it's uncomfortable on glass, so they devolve the language to fit the use case instead. If you like it, that's fine, but it doesn't mean you shouldn't be able to uninstall a program if you don't need it, however small it is.
My phone has a Netflix app built in. I don't have a Netflix account, so I don't understand: 1. Why am I not allowed to uninstall it? 2. Even if I had an account, why on earth would I want to use Netflix on a phone?
www.droidwin.com/remove-uninstall-bloatware-apps-from-android-via-adb-commands/
Though I wouldn't burn the account, I don't see the point. Just create one and never use it except for setting up Windows Home edition. I already have one just for dropping machines out of S-Mode.
Sadly this time I won't be playing, new job and all. But I really do wish you luck.
As wrong as it feels, I will likely be forced to comply with running the Intel ME on my board again so my business can run this. Meh.
microsoft can tell many things on a long day! :nutkick:
call me insane :kookoo: BUT in case u clean install the upcoming OS.... just plug out your WiFi- and cabled internet! U will be asked if u can connect to it but just say to the installer; NO! i have no internet! Your win10 account is valid and activates the OS automatically. Otherwise create an Local Account. And stay offline during the whole installation process until u are the first time on the desktop and u installed all your stuff just as usual.
then go online again.
ez!
This is a continuation of that on 11.