Monday, September 20th 2021
Intel Arc Alchemist Reference Boards Offered to Partners
Intel Senior VP and GM of Graphics Group, Raja Koduri has recently been interviewed by Japanese site ASCII where he revealed some new details about the companies upcoming Arc Alchemist gaming graphics cards. The cards will be manufactured on the TSMC N6 process instead of Intel's 7 node due to limited capacity however he did confirm that future cards could be manufactured directly by Intel. Raja also confirmed that Intel was currently offering reference boards to their partners to develop custom Arc Alchemist cards. This reference board is likely the same one we saw in early leaks from Moore's Law is Dead and the design featured by Intel in their promotional videos. The board partners may use the same cooler design in their cards or create semi-custom solutions.
Source:
ASCII
Raja KoduriPartners and I think there will be a differentiation of ODM, and that will lead to the ultimate customer interest
23 Comments on Intel Arc Alchemist Reference Boards Offered to Partners
Where is the proof, much less the pudding?
They're slated to launch next year and you're complaining that there are no reviews out?
Could be just bare PCB with layout and traces.
More hype, more disappointment.
This is the reason why I ordered msi 3060 ti gaming z trio for 600e... :D
Remember Raja is a AMD leftover that was fired due to the handling of Vega and his lying.
PowerVR/Imagination Technologies has a better chance at competing against both AMD and ngreedia if they were to release a X86 discreet GPU.
For point 2, is this fact or just speculation? I've not recalled reading anything about this. I am no fan of Raja and his beat around the bush method to try and minimise disappointment, but to his defence, AMD likely don't have a lot of budget for him at that point in time for the development of Vega. I recall AMD was at the brink of bankruptcy. Budget is less of an issue over at Intel (though he don't have infinite resources). If the product is on point with the target performance, I think Intel/ Raja have done pretty well for their first GPU. Just that the release timeline is quite late, so back to point 1.
And never returned.... Joined intel a month after going on a 3mo. sabbatical.
going to tsmc like everyone else just means we will get another overpriced product.
His real claim to fame was polaris,w hich was compettive, but instead of scaling it up he went with the 3DFX strategy and vega was the result. The zen led team did finally manage to get vega to a point where it is an efficient iGPU design, but it took years. If he'd just scaled up polaris to meet at least the 1070 he wouldnt have earned the reputation he did....
They're setting themselves up for a driver fail fall, with quite the hype train.
Given time frames of when Vega came out and how long architectures take to develop RDNA design work would have been pretty much 100% done so it would stand to reason that Raja would have seen that through from start to finish as well from a design perspective.
Sure AMD has come up with a LOT of good ideas and they haven’t had the funds or people to bring a few to fruition. Raj was so focused on making high performance compute parts that were supposed to be great at everything he forgot GPUs are for gaming. He is doing the same at Intel and they will have (someday after the smoke clears, and the mirrors are broken) a compute die that also does graphics at mediocre performance and or high performance with high TDP. The supposed huge performance increases we were told about that were first only IGP parts that failed to meet competitive benchmarks against Vega ( XE was 10% slower) in the same power envelope (Intel 15W VS AMD 15W) AMD also having twice the cores, and better overall performance.