Friday, November 12th 2021

UL Announces 3DMark SSD Storage Benchmark

For more than 20 years, 3DMark has been gamers' first choice for benchmarking the latest graphics cards and processors. Today, we're taking 'The Gamer's Benchmark' into a new area with the 3DMark Storage Benchmark, a dedicated component test for measuring the gaming performance of SSDs, hybrid drives, and other storage devices.

With fast modern SSD storage, loading times are shorter, levels restart faster, and there are fewer interruptions to your gameplay. PC gamers can now choose from a wide range of high-performance storage options from the fastest PCI Express 4.0 and NVMe devices down to cheaper SATA SSDs and high-capacity hybrid drives.
Unfortunately, many of the tools for measuring storage performance were developed when HDDs were the most common drive type. And it's hard to relate results from those synthetic benchmarks to real-world performance. The 3DMark Storage Benchmark is a dedicated component test that measures the gaming performance of the fastest modern PC storage hardware. It supports all the latest storage technologies and focuses on practical, real-world gaming performance.

Real-world gaming performance

The problem with many storage tests is that they use artificial, synthetic workloads to measure performance under ideal conditions. Results from these tests are hard to relate to practical, everyday needs, which is why the 3DMark Storage Benchmark focuses on measuring real-world gaming performance.

Storage activity consists of input and output operations. It is possible to record these operations while the storage device is performing a task. These recordings are called traces.

The 3DMark Storage Benchmark uses traces recorded from popular games and gaming-related activities to measure real-world gaming performance, such as:
  • Loading Battlefield V from launch to the main menu.
  • Loading Call of Duty : Black Ops 4 from launch to the main menu.
  • Loading Overwatch from launch to the main menu.
  • Recording a 1080p gameplay video at 60 FPS with OBS (Open Broadcaster Software) while playing Overwatch.
  • Installing The Outer Worlds from the Epic Games Launcher.
  • Saving game progress in The Outer Worlds.
  • Copying the Steam folder for Counter-Strike : Global Offensive from an external SSD to the system drive.
Compare the performance of the latest SSDs

The 3DMark Storage Benchmark is compatible with all modern storage devices and can be used to test both internal and external drives.

The test produces a 3DMark Storage Benchmark Score as a measure of performance. As usual with 3DMark, a higher score means better performance. Here are a few reference scores for context.
  • Intel Optane SSD 900P 280 GB (PCI Express 3 M.2) - 4,241
  • Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500 GB (PCI Express 4 M.2) - 2,854
  • WD_BLACK SN750 NVMe 500 GB (PCI Express 3 M.2) - 2,014
  • Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1 TB (SATA III) - 1,193
The test also produces bandwidth and average access time metrics.

Pricing & Availability

The Storage Benchmark DLC is available now for 2.99 USD on Steam and the UL Benchmarks website for 3DMark Advanced Edition while Professional Edition owners with a valid annual license will receive the benchmark as a free update.
Source: UL Benchmarks
Add your own comment

33 Comments on UL Announces 3DMark SSD Storage Benchmark

#26
isvelte
Vecix6It's a really boring test nothing to see. It took about 25 minutes to show only 2 result numbers... If the test measures suposed time to load Battlefield V, why not show this in time?
"Saving game progress on outer worlds" that weirdly takes over a minute is not interesting to watch aswell :p
Posted on Reply
#27
Tomorrow
watzupkenIntel Optane don’t excel at sequential read/write speed as compared to a fast PCI-E 4.0 SSD. But Optane has a huge advantage when it comes to latency and seek time, it is in a league of its own. So if you are looking for faster loading time, Optane should offer that. Conventional NAND based SSDs have been improving on sequential speed, which does not really improve responsiveness, at least not anywhere close to Optane. Which is why Optane tends to dominate benchmarks that don’t just focus on pure transfer rates.
I would not say that 7200MB/s read and 4800MB/s write is anything to sneeze at compared to fastest NAND drive with 7400/7000 numbers:
geizhals.eu/?cmp=2621453&cmp=2447645

Like you said yourself the user will problably not notice the difference in sequential transfer speeds. Especially between 7000 and 4800.
And that 7000 is SLC cached on NAND. It drops to around 1000 when the cache is full.
Posted on Reply
#28
chrcoluk
Not sure of the merits of this, people already incorrectly think gen 4 drives are going to make a big difference to common every day usage. Its also already been proven even on the consoles with their new i/o API gen 3 drives are as good as gen 4.

But this will sell many premium gen 4 drives though so samsung etc. will be happy. :)
Posted on Reply
#29
isvelte
piloponthI don’t know Rick, benchmark that takes away precious write cycles from my SSD. I will pass.
I monitor the tbw during the whole process, it barely wrote 10gb, watching youtube for 20 mins does more write cycles than that
Posted on Reply
#31
mechtech
watzupkenIn my opinion, this is another meaningless benchmark. From what I can glean from the benchmark results, I feel the few tests that impacts the result is likely the last test where files are being copied over. The rest like loading of games, I think there are plenty of test results that shows very little difference between good SSDs. So the benchmark results make you feel like you have a crap SSD, but in reality it works perfectly fine for people just thinking about game/ application loading time.
Ya, when it comes to drives and most other hardware I prefer real world benchmarks, pull out the stopwatch and show me how fast my OS and games load and stuff installs. (for home use anyway)

www.techpowerup.com/review/crucial-p5-plus-1-tb/8.html
www.techpowerup.com/review/crucial-p5-plus-1-tb/13.html
www.techpowerup.com/review/crucial-p5-plus-1-tb/16.html

For game loading SATA and NVMe are about even most things considered. However I guess driver makers would like this, it gives them grounds for market segregation and jacking up prices for drives with high benchmark numbers.
Posted on Reply
#32
Psychoholic
WonkoTheSaneUKI have one. I won it as a door prize at that year's annual "Citizen Con" - The yearly (except for the last couple, obviously) conference for video game, Star Citizen.
Intel sponsored that year's event to launch the SSD, and gave the company 200 or so to give away.
Yup, I also have one (280GB) sitting in my closet.
Was using it as a boot drive for a long time but its just too small.
Posted on Reply
#33
WonkoTheSaneUK
PsychoholicYup, I also have one (280GB) sitting in my closet.
Was using it as a boot drive for a long time but its just too small.
Mine (perhaps unsurprisingly) is named "Golden Ticket", and houses my Star Citizen installation.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Sep 3rd, 2024 00:56 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts