Wednesday, April 20th 2022
AMD Radeon RX 6400 Launched at $159
AMD formally launched the entry-level Radeon RX 6400 graphics card. At an MSRP of $159, this is the most affordable graphics card from the Radeon RX 6000 series. It is based on the same RDNA2 graphics architecture as the rest of the RX 6000 lineup, and the smallest silicon of them all, the "Navi 23." This chip is built on the TSMC N6 (6 nm) silicon fabrication process.
The RX 6400 shares the "Navi 23" silicon with the RX 6500 XT launched earlier this year. AMD enabled 12 out of 16 RDNA2 compute units on the silicon, resulting in 768 stream processors, 48 TMUs, 12 Ray Accelerators, and 32 ROPs. The memory configuration is similar to the RX 6500 XT, with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 64-bit wide memory bus. This is the same 16 Gbps-rated memory, which means 128 GB/s bandwidth on tap. There's also 16 MB of Infinity Cache. The engine clocks (GPU clocks) are set at 2039 MHz (game) and 2321 MHz (boost). With its given specs, the RX 6400 has a typical graphics power (TGP) of just 53 W, and so cards can do without any power connectors.
The RX 6400 shares the "Navi 23" silicon with the RX 6500 XT launched earlier this year. AMD enabled 12 out of 16 RDNA2 compute units on the silicon, resulting in 768 stream processors, 48 TMUs, 12 Ray Accelerators, and 32 ROPs. The memory configuration is similar to the RX 6500 XT, with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 64-bit wide memory bus. This is the same 16 Gbps-rated memory, which means 128 GB/s bandwidth on tap. There's also 16 MB of Infinity Cache. The engine clocks (GPU clocks) are set at 2039 MHz (game) and 2321 MHz (boost). With its given specs, the RX 6400 has a typical graphics power (TGP) of just 53 W, and so cards can do without any power connectors.
81 Comments on AMD Radeon RX 6400 Launched at $159
OP not for me, it does feel like £50+ overpriced.
With current electricity prices how does this compare in efficency towards 750ti/1050ti low profile cards with no extra power plug?
And which "casual" games run on this piece of p**p nicely, if something along the line of counterstrike gets rereleased it might be too slow again :)
i still don't get why gpu's are so scarce, is manufacturing so hard of the main chip? Does smug joe now buy external gpu instead of intel onboard just to use more than one display?
It can't be true that half of europe is gaming on "home office" work rules....
www.techpowerup.com/review/his-hd-4670-iceq-turbo/
www.techpowerup.com/review/axle-radeon-hd-5670/
Well done proving me right.
I am not arguing about this card's elevated price or relative performance, I would want to see more reviews before still not bothering with that, since it's as interesting to me as a GT 940 ,total hyperbole and miss information however will make me react.
It's now $200 EVERYWHERE
www.amazon.com/ASUS-Phoenix-Graphics-DisplayPort-Axial-tech/dp/B08G5CH316/ref=pd_lpo_2?pd_rd_i=B08G5CH316&psc=1
Why would anyone o with AMD this generation?
But, if there is indeed a review, may it be on a PCIe 3.0 platform.
The 560 was a 50-tier product. www.techspot.com/review/1430-radeon-rx-560-vs-geforce-gtx-1050/page8.html
The 550 was the 30-tier.
in my case think about buy intel arc because my needs are low (non heavy games most old games and recording) and gpu market need one player more for put some pressure for scumbag companiesI remember when for 100us you can buy 4gb vram card with 128bit memory bus, complete pci-e lanes and decent decode and encode capabilities like rx 560
fuck scumbag companies with assholes like frank azor with phrases like this to 4gb in rx 6500 xt::)