Monday, April 25th 2022

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT Surfaces on GFXBench, 2% - 12% Faster than RX 6700 XT

The upcoming AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has recently appeared in a benchmark listing on the GFXBench website where it performed 2% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is an upcoming refresh of the RX 6700 XT featuring faster GDDR6 memory running at 18 Gbps and increased clock speeds. The RX 6750 XT achieved a score of 366.5 FPS in the single GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier off-screen entry which is 2% faster than the average RX 6700 XT score at 362.2 FPS for the same test. This initial test is not likely to be a representative sample of the card's performance but we would expect further tests to leak in the coming days. The AMD Radeon RX 6750XT is set to be officially unveiled on May 10th and will gradually replace existing RX 6700 XT offerings.

Update: The card has also been tested in various other GFXBench 5.0 tests including Aztec Ruins Normal Tier, Manhattan, and T-Rex where it achieves scores 6% - 12% above the RX 6700 XT.
Sources: GFXBench 1, GFXBench 2, VideoCardz
Add your own comment

34 Comments on AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT Surfaces on GFXBench, 2% - 12% Faster than RX 6700 XT

#26
mechtech
Chrispy_Coming as a shock to absolutely nobody, a 3.8% overclock in "game clock" speeds in an otherwise identical product results in underwhelming performance improvement that's so negligible it will often be masked by run-to-run variance and margin of error. The faster VRAM isn't relevant because bandwidth was never the 6700XT's bottleneck until you got to resolutions and settings so demanding that the framerates were already unplayable.

6700XT Game Clock = 2424MHz
6750XT Game Clock = 2518MHz

If you want to turn your 6700XT into a 6750XT, just increase the power limit and fan speeds by 15% and overclock it. Well done, you've 'upgraded'!
ya basically same as the rx480 > rx580
Posted on Reply
#27
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
Chrispy_Still 7nm, it's utterly unchanged silicon in every possible way and that means that a 6700XT made recently will reach the same clocks at whatever power level/voltage the 6750XT launches with.

What's new is that since the 6700XT was released, 18Gbps GDDR6 is more widely available, not that the 6700XT needed extra memory bandwidth, but I feel AMD are clutching at straws for this zero-effort refresh so specifying the current mainstream VRAM speed is at least some numerical change that doesn't actually have any effect on the amount of work they (as the GPU maker, not the VRAM maker) need to worry about.
I'd guess that yields just have gotten much better so they clock higher.
Posted on Reply
#28
Assimilator
I'm glad we have a shitty cellphone benchmark to confirm that adding slightly faster memory makes a GPU slightly faster.
phanbueyvery confused what the point of these so close to the next gen is...
Take up headline space to hopefully crowd out RTX 4000. It's been AMD's standard operating procedure for years when they have nothing to compete with.
Posted on Reply
#29
Punkenjoy
mechtechya basically same as the rx480 > rx580
More like RX580 to RX590. The change between 480 and 580 was much bigger (about 1200+ MHz to 1400+ MHz.

They are just there to get reviewed and occupy the space and get some press attention while we wait for next gen. They are just there because yields are better now and they can improve the clock a little bit.

As for the price, they will be priced according to the market or they won't sold any. Availability is getting there and you can now buy a GPU easily so the scalper are having a hard time these days.
Posted on Reply
#30
mechtech
PunkenjoyMore like RX580 to RX590. The change between 480 and 580 was much bigger (about 1200+ MHz to 1400+ MHz.

They are just there to get reviewed and occupy the space and get some press attention while we wait for next gen. They are just there because yields are better now and they can improve the clock a little bit.

As for the price, they will be priced according to the market or they won't sold any. Availability is getting there and you can now buy a GPU easily so the scalper are having a hard time these days.
prices slowly getting better, availability way better
www.newegg.ca/p/pl?d=rx+6600&Order=1

only $80 above MSRP now lol I will keep waiting

the RX 480 - 580 - 590 were roughly in the in 5-10% increase neighbourhood
www.techpowerup.com/review/sapphire-radeon-rx-590-nitro-plus/32.html
Posted on Reply
#32
mechtech
ARFNo, RX 6600's MSRP was 329, they ask 510 for it now.




This is 55% scalping.
The MSRP is $329 USD, I was talking CAD $ (329x1.26) = $415 CAD, so about $85 CAD over MSRP. But ya still a rip, but getting better.
Posted on Reply
#33
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
Chrispy_Still 7nm, it's utterly unchanged silicon in every possible way and that means that a 6700XT made recently will reach the same clocks at whatever power level/voltage the 6750XT launches with.

What's new is that since the 6700XT was released, 18Gbps GDDR6 is more widely available, not that the 6700XT needed extra memory bandwidth, but I feel AMD are clutching at straws for this zero-effort refresh so specifying the current mainstream VRAM speed is at least some numerical change that doesn't actually have any effect on the amount of work they (as the GPU maker, not the VRAM maker) need to worry about.
They are refined silicon hence the transition from RX480-580-590.
Posted on Reply
#34
Chrispy_
eidairaman1They are refined silicon hence the transition from RX480-580-590.
Refined in what way? They were both identical Ellesmere dies with zero tweaks in silicon and on the exact same Samsung/GloFo 14LPP process.
The RX 590 was on a tweaked, smaller process node that was actually different (moved from 14LPP to 12LP+) but I didn't ever mention that - you've just brought it into the discussion for the first time, so how is it relevant here or to my point?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 22nd, 2024 05:13 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts