Thursday, August 4th 2022

Intel WiFi 7 Products to be Unveiled in 2024 with Speeds of up to 5.8 Gbps

Although Intel threw in the towel and gave up on making routers and gateways back in 2020, the company is still the world's largest manufacturer of WiFi modules for computers. Now news out of Korea suggests that Intel's first WiFi 7 products will be launched in 2024, about a year after the expected availability of the first WiFi 7 routers and gateways. That said, based on a quote from Eric McLaughlin, vice president of Intel's wireless solutions division, who attended an unspecified press conference in the APAC region, Intel "expect it to appear in major markets in 2025." This suggests that it'll be a late 2024 launch and we might see competitors' products in notebooks and PCs way ahead of Intel this time around.

That said, the WiFi 7 standard is currently only in the late stages of development, despite Broadcom, MediaTek and Qualcomm having announced multiple products already. It's likely we'll see another round of draft spec hardware launching either later this year, or next year, with the final WiFi 7 spec not expected to be ratified until 2024. As such, Intel may be later than its competitors, but should hopefully launch a feature complete product. Intel's products should support speeds of up to 5.8 GHz, although this would be using a 320 MHz wide channel and 4K QAM, which means these speeds will be limited to a few meters from a router. WiFi devices have a history of quirky issues between brands, even if none of them have been so severe that a fallback to an older standard hasn't solved the problem, but it's still been a hassle for consumers. Hopefully WiFi 7 won't repeat history, but we wouldn't place a bet on it.
Sources: ET News Korea, via Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

19 Comments on Intel WiFi 7 Products to be Unveiled in 2024 with Speeds of up to 5.8 Gbps

#1
ThrashZone
Hi,
Now all we need is a isp to crank it up without wanting a kidney :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#2
zlobby
I for one would prefer for intel to first fix the drivers for their existing lineup.
Posted on Reply
#3
TheLostSwede
News Editor
ThrashZoneHi,
Now all we need is a isp to crank it up without wanting a kidney :laugh:
You just need to move to the right place...
zlobbyI for one would prefer for intel to first fix the drivers for their existing lineup.
What issues are you seeing? I know there was some issue going on, but haven't kept up to date. Don't really use WiFi on my desktop, but the few times I have, it's been fine.
Posted on Reply
#4
zlobby
TheLostSwedeYou just need to move to the right place...


What issues are you seeing? I know there was some issue going on, but haven't kept up to date. Don't really use WiFi on my desktop, but the few times I have, it's been fine.
Oh, the usual disconnects, .ax over .ac priority not working properly, need to disable .ax for 5GHz to work, etc. The usual.
Posted on Reply
#5
TheLostSwede
News Editor
zlobbyOh, the usual disconnects, .ax over .ac priority not working properly, need to disable .ax for 5GHz to work, etc. The usual.
That sounds terrible. Not seen anything like that.
Could be related to your router hardware, as Intel seems to have a history of having issues with certain router hardware, especially from Broadcom.
Until recently, I've only ever had Qualcomm based hardware when it comes to routers and AP's at home.
Posted on Reply
#6
zlobby
TheLostSwedeThat sounds terrible. Not seen anything like that.
Could be related to your router hardware, as Intel seems to have a history of having issues with certain router hardware, especially from Broadcom.
Until recently, I've only ever had Qualcomm based hardware when it comes to routers and AP's at home.
That would be a fair guess if we weren't talking about a mix of various WiFi adapters and enterprise-grade AP and routers (Aruba, Rukus, MT, Ubiquiti, EnGenuis).
Posted on Reply
#7
TheLostSwede
News Editor
zlobbyThat would be a fair guess if we weren't talking about a mix of various WiFi adapters and enterprise-grade AP and routers (Aruba, Rukus, MT, Ubiquiti, EnGenuis).
Hmmm, sounds... lovely... I guess at least some of that is related to none of the companies following the spec to 100%, but instead coming up with their own little additions to make things "better".
Posted on Reply
#8
zlobby
TheLostSwedeHmmm, sounds... lovely... I guess at least some of that is related to none of the companies following the spec to 100%, but instead coming up with their own little additions to make things "better".
True to an extent, I gotta admit.
Posted on Reply
#9
TheLostSwede
News Editor
zlobbyTrue to an extent, I gotta admit.
I used to work for a router manufacturer, so I've got a little bit of an insight, even though that was back when 802.11ac was just launching.
Qualcomm f-ed up so badly they had to do a chip respin on their WiFi radios, yet TP-Link had already sold a product with those radios and they were unfixable. TP-Link did what they always do, a new hardware revision and never updated the old product again...
Posted on Reply
#10
Durvelle27
ThrashZoneHi,
Now all we need is a isp to crank it up without wanting a kidney :laugh:
It's not bad

I pay $150 for 1.2Gbps through Xfinity

This is what AT&T offers which I'm planning to switch too

Posted on Reply
#11
DeathtoGnomes
Durvelle27It's not bad

I pay $150 for 1.2Gbps through Xfinity

This is what AT&T offers which I'm planning to switch too

Arent those AT&T offers limited data? Comcast offers 1.2Gb data cap.
Posted on Reply
#12
Wirko
Intel of course is the most credible source to listen to if we want to know what will be in 2024.
Posted on Reply
#13
ThrashZone
Durvelle27It's not bad

I pay $150 for 1.2Gbps through Xfinity

This is what AT&T offers which I'm planning to switch too

Hi,
AT&T is the freaking devil company that doesn't know what price contracts are and raises the price a little every month so no thanks been there done that and never again for any service.

At least xfinity price is the exact same every month so yes I do use them now.
Only free cell phone I've ever gotten to.

No where near 150.us a month though for 900mbps
Posted on Reply
#14
MentalAcetylide
I think some misunderstand. You're never going to see or need those speeds unless you have a lot of apps/devices collectively using that much bandwidth. For example, downloading a large game is still going to be relatively slow since download rates are usually capped on the host's end.
Posted on Reply
#15
Durvelle27
ThrashZoneHi,
AT&T is the freaking devil company that doesn't know what price contracts are and raises the price a little every month so no thanks been there done that and never again for any service.

At least xfinity price is the exact same every month so yes I do use them now.
Only free cell phone I've ever gotten to.

No where near 150.us a month though for 900mbps
I also have XH
MentalAcetylideI think some misunderstand. You're never going to see or need those speeds unless you have a lot of apps/devices collectively using that much bandwidth. For example, downloading a large game is still going to be relatively slow since download rates are usually capped on the host's end.
You can't speak for most of us. I definitely use all my bandwidth
Posted on Reply
#16
Minus Infinity
Intel marketing says 2024, so 2026 actual shipping date.
Posted on Reply
#17
MentalAcetylide
Durvelle27I also have XH


You can't speak for most of us. I definitely use all my bandwidth
Agreed. Some people do need it. I'm just pointing out that even though someone has a connection rate of 1Gbps+, they're not going to be downloading stuff at that speed. It just means they can have more activity on their line without it causing latency or affecting other connections. My tested max download speed is around 140 Mbps, but if I'm downloading a game, I'm lucky if it hits 30 Mbps.
Posted on Reply
#18
Palladium
I use positively ancient USB2.0 300 Mbps 802.11n 5GHz on real 1GBps FTTH and I still feel I'm not missing anything.
Posted on Reply
#19
LuxZg
For this to be effective we need 10 gigabit connection from ISP at reasonable rates, cheap 10GbE switches, and all that before 2025.

IMHO, for single family homes and small offices this is all overkill. We need stable reliable connectivity, low latency, not huge (unrealistic) speeds.

Btw, typo there : "Intel's products should support speeds of up to 5.8 GHz" (probably Gbps)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 21st, 2024 23:13 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts