Wednesday, September 21st 2022

EVGA Announces Cancelation of NVIDIA Next-gen Graphics Cards Plans, Officially Terminates NVIDIA Partnership

Towards the latter half of August, multiple EVGA employees involved in technical marketing and engineering had let us know privately that they were leaving the company for other ventures. When pushed further, several hinted towards some decisions being made by EVGA's management, including CEO Andrew Han, that would jeopardize their future. Some even went far enough to say they would share more in a few weeks time about how they felt exactly about their time there, the various issues that kept them from doing their best, and also that at least a couple of ex-employees were let go. TechPowerUp was doing due diligence in collecting the facts while keeping emotions aside from contacts who were understandably not in the best of moods, and one thing common across the board was there was something major coming up dealing with the EVGA GPU product line.

Today EVGA decided to throw a massive curve ball by formally announcing the company is canceling its plans to carry the next generation of graphics cards. Given EVGA's revenue sheets point to nearly 80% contribution from being an NVIDIA add-in card partner, this effectively also means an end to a long partnership with NVIDIA. The company's CEO confirmed as much to a few media channels citing poor margins and a challenging, stressful relationship that was no longer fruitful. There are no plans for EVGA to partner with AMD or Intel at this time when it comes to graphics cards and the company stressed they will continue to sell and support current-gen GPUs having retained enough units for RMA purposes too.
Jon Peddie Research also speculates EVGA is going to shift its priorities towards power supplies and motherboards instead that allow for higher margins and a more uniform, predictable sales pattern. Time will tell how EVGA, and indeed NVIDIA too who now has to re-distribute its GPU allocation among other partners and retail solutions, will come out of this split. It certainly does not seem to be an amicable one and we do not expect the partnership to resume anytime soon. This also affects companies who were no doubt planning on accessories for EVGA-branded GPUs, such as custom watercooling blocks from the usual suspects such as EKWB, Alphacool, and Bitspower.
What About Existing Customers
All existing owners of EVGA graphics cards will remain fully covered by warranties, including full replacements if needed. The company has withheld inventory of EVGA graphics cards from retailers (and will probably recall some perfectly-functional cards), so it has buffer stock to serve existing customers in need of total replacements or RMA.

What EVGA's Future Looks Like
EVGA CEO Andrew Han stated that the company has no plans as of now to partner with another GPU manufacturer like AMD or Intel, and the exit from the graphics card business will trigger an "imminent downsizing" of the company (to shed employees associated with the graphics card business). This could also be a subtle hint to AMD and Intel that if they're looking to work with EVGA, they should express interest right now.

Graphics cards made up over three-quarters of EVGA's revenue, and so we're not sure what the company could do next. If one were to speculate, the company could increase its presence in the prebuilt notebook and gaming peripherals businesses, and probably even ride the growth-cycle in the power-supply market with ATX 3.0 and PCIe Gen 5. Next-generation high-end graphics cards are expected to trigger upgrades among those with PSUs 4 years or older, as older PSUs, particularly mainstream ones, will find it hard to deal with the power excursions (spikes) of high-end PCIe Gen 5 graphics cards. The company could also retain its PCB engineering team to further develop its motherboard business. But all these are just speculation. Unless EVGA significantly invests in its other businesses, it's done.

How does this affect NVIDIA in the North American market?
EVGA was particularly popular in the North American market, among DIY PC enthusiasts. Other NVIDIA partners such as ASUS, could attempt to fill its void, but the distinct industrial design of EVGA will be lost, as would features such as iCX; and EVGA-exclusive customer programs such as trade-in upgrades. NVIDIA may also attempt to bring in new partners to the North American market to fill EVGA's void, such as GALAX (Galaxy), or Colorful, which are both major graphics card OEMs in the Chinese market. It will now fall on them to match the design and quality standards EVGA established. EVGA's exit will have minimal impact on NVIDIA's bottom-line, as those in the market for a GeForce graphics card will ultimately buy one from whichever brand.

NVIDIA's first reaction to this development is as follows:
"We've had a great partnership with EVGA over the years and will continue to support them on our current generation of products. We wish Andrew and our friends at EVGA all the best."
EVGA's full statement is as follows:
EVGA CEO Andrew HanEVGA has terminated its relationship with NVIDIA. EVGA will no longer be manufacturing video cards of any type, citing a souring relationship with NVIDIA as the cause (among other reasons that were minimized). EVGA will not be exploring relationships with AMD or Intel at this time, and the company will be downsizing imminently as it exits the video card market. Customers will still be covered by EVGA policies, but EVGA will no longer make RTX or other video cards. The company already made, 20 EVT samples of EVGA RTX 4090 FTW3 cards, but will not be moving to production and has killed all active projects pertaining to cards, including KINGPIN cards.
According to JPR, EVGA was the best-selling NVIDIA AIB in the US market, with a market-share of nearly 40%. NVIDIA would have lead its board partners to take its place.

Update Sep 21st: KINGPIN, a long time associate of EVGA, behind some of their fastest boutique graphics cards and motherboards, posted a note of gratitude for all the fans of EVGA + KINGPIN, and stated that KINGPIN Hardware may continue in some form.
I'm thankful for all the industry friends, old colleagues, etc. that reached out. It means a lot and I appreciate it. The news isn't received well ofc, and I'm mostly sorry for the fans and people that are passionate for our brand and everything that we have done here over the years at EVGA. If the KP hardware is meant to continue on in one way or another, I'm sure that it will :). The EVGA and PC hardware enthusiast community have been great to me and my teams here over the years, THANK YOU.
Update Sep 21st: Jensen Huang responded to a question about his thoughts on EVGA in a Q&A session today:
Jensen HuangYou know, Andrew (EVGA CEO) wanted to wind down the business, and he's wanted to do that for a couple of years. Andrew and EVGA were, are great partners and we're great partners, and I'm sad to see them leave the market. But, he's got other plans and he's been thinking about it for several years, so I guess that's about it. The market has a lot of great players and it will be served well after EVGA, but I'll always miss them, they were an important part of our history, Andrew is a great friend. I think that it was just time for him to go do something else."
Sources: Jon Peddie Research, Gamers Nexus, EVGA, Tae Kim (Twitter)
Add your own comment

536 Comments on EVGA Announces Cancelation of NVIDIA Next-gen Graphics Cards Plans, Officially Terminates NVIDIA Partnership

#501
HD64G
TheinsanegamerN"You know, Andrew (EVGA CEO) wanted to wind down the business, and he's wanted to do that for a couple of years. Andrew and EVGA were, are great partners and we're great partners, and I'm sad to see them leave the market. But, he's got other plans and he's been thinking about it for several years, so I guess that's about it. The market has a lot of great players and it will be served well after EVGA, but I'll always miss them, they were an important part of our history, Andrew is a great friend. I think that it was just time for him to go do something else.""

Well that's....rather damning, if you take leather jacket at his word. Even with a grain of salt, it would be lent some legitimacy given the holes in EVGA's story and reasoning. Nvidia may have played a big part in Andrew wanting to wind down EVGA, but it takes two.

Then how do the likes of asus, gigabyte, and msi manage 7-10% margins? Furthermore, what about the scalping that went on for 2 years? Last time I checked, when the 3080 was selling for $1000 onEVGA's site that was more then 5% of the original profit margin.
EVGA had the biggest share in US market because they had the best priced models that had above average quality. That tells me that they pushed their profit margins below the rest to keep that share high. They simply didn't want to keep doing that anymore since they sell PSUs and boards with much higher margins. Before they entered the PSU market they were forced to do so but weren't happy to collaborate with nVidia as the leaked discussions tell. My 5c.
Posted on Reply
#502
TheoneandonlyMrK
Like it's even questionable.
What some have not grasped is how many companies stepped away from Nvidia, Because of Nvidia before.
Posted on Reply
#503
tussinman
Bomby569and this is why EVGA is in trouble, brand new

they were counting on the endless crypto
Nvidia is actually the ones who pitched to Asus, MSI, and Evga that they would remanufacturer RTX 2060 boards if they were interested.

It actually ended up working out for the consumer, the last 4-5 months in the US the brand new 2060s have actually been faster and cheaper than the 3050....... (what exactly is the issue ?)
Bomby569You shouldn't have brand new 2060's to sell in September 2022, that's why they're losing money.
Bomby569Bought all they could and couldn't to cash on crypto, and clearly have excess of crap.
I think your confusing what actually happened. These 2060s aren't old stock that they are holding, there new production that NVidia actually pitched the idea to them.

Nvidia pitched the idea because there the idiots that basically wanted these third party brands to sell what was essentially a 7 year old GTX 1070 (3050) for $300+ brand new......
Posted on Reply
#504
Valantar
tussinmanNvidia is actually the ones who pitched to Asus, MSI, and Evga that they would remanufacturer RTX 2060 boards if they were interested.

It actually ended up working out for the consumer, the last 4-5 months in the US the brand new 2060s have actually been faster and cheaper than the 3050....... (what exactly is the issue ?)


I think your confusing what actually happened. These 2060s aren't old stock that they are holding, there new production that NVidia actually pitched the idea to them.

Nvidia pitched the idea because there the idiots that basically wanted these third party brands to sell what was essentially a 7 year old GTX 1070 (3050) for $300+ brand new......
More like Nvidia had a heap of spare RTX 2060/TU106 dice laying around (or got a sweet deal from TSMC to spin up a new production run of them on 12nm) and saw an opportunity to cash in on selling even more, at relatively high prices, of a die that long since had it's R&D costs amortized and was at this point almost pure profit. Still not a bad deal for consumers considering the alternatives, but I don't see any reason to present this as some "Nvidia steps in to save the day for consumers" type of scenario. If that was their desire, they could just have skipped the direct-to-miners sales and implemented an effective one GPU per customer queue scheme while ensuring cards sold at or near MSRP.
Posted on Reply
#505
MarsM4N
Bomby569they were counting on the endless crypto
Yep, the party is over. The music stopped playing. :laugh: But they where drowning in revenue the last years, thanks to the crypto boom.
I am not shedding a tear. Let's dance on their grave & celebrate the market is back to normal. Thanks to recession there will soon be a price war battling for customers.




Bryan has also a very "balanced" take on it.

Posted on Reply
#506
tussinman
ValantarMore like Nvidia had a heap of spare RTX 2060/TU106 dice laying around (or got a sweet deal from TSMC to spin up a new production run of them on 12nm) and saw an opportunity to cash in on selling even more, at relatively high prices, of a die that long since had it's R&D costs amortized and was at this point almost pure profit.
Exactly my point, he was making it seem like there inventory was so bad that they where literally trying to sell cards from 2019
Valantarbut I don't see any reason to present this as some "Nvidia steps in to save the day for consumers" type of scenario.
No that's not what I was saying. The user I was originally quoted was basically trying to insinuate "of course Evga failed, there inventory management is so bad that they still have RTX 2060s that they haven't sold" and I was point out no those are actually 2022 shipments and that there higher-up (Nvidia) basically forced them to sell them if they wanted any hope of making profit on the sub $300 market
Posted on Reply
#507
RandallFlagg
This is just so dumb. It's like, what is that hanging off your GPU? Oh, that's the motherboard..

Posted on Reply
#508
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
They should move to Radeon side like XFX did. EVGA Radeons would be hella cool.
Posted on Reply
#509
DeathtoGnomes
Bomby569You shouldn't have brand new 2060's to sell in September 2022, that's why they're losing money.
Actually you should, those were cards prolly set aside for RMA replacements, and now being sold outright since they dont need them anymore.
tussinman(what exactly is the issue ?)
somebody needs something to complain about or bash someone else for the hell of it. why else?
Posted on Reply
#510
lexluthermiester
LenneThey should move to Radeon side like XFX did. EVGA Radeons would be hella cool.
Or do both Radeon AND Intel's Arc. That would be excellent!
Posted on Reply
#511
wheresmycar
RandallFlaggThis is just so dumb. It's like, what is that hanging off your GPU? Oh, that's the motherboard..

lol, RTX 5090 first pictured here by his eminence RandallFlag
Posted on Reply
#512
MentalAcetylide
RandallFlaggThis is just so dumb. It's like, what is that hanging off your GPU? Oh, that's the motherboard..

Yes, if you want a 4090(not sure about the sizes of the 4080s or below), you need to make sure the motherboard & hardware configuration supports it. I have an MSI TRX40 motherboard with a 3090 Kingpin + Lenovo RTX A6000. I'm pretty sure if I wanted to upgrade to a 4090, I would also have to remove the RTX A6000 just to make enough room for a single 4090. The size of these 4000-series cards is just stupid. Sometimes you have to wonder if they're not deliberately doing this nonsense just to piss people off. At least they dealt with the power spike issue(or so they said). I'll be skipping this generation completely, that's for sure. I would imagine by the time we have the 5000 series, I'll be needing a true workstation motherboard with 12 slots mounted in a case the size of a small refrigerator if I want to have two of them installed on it. Nvlink may be dead, but I can still have 2 or more cards work on the same render to finish it quicker.
Posted on Reply
#513
claes
One real advantage with these latest generations evga had was the size of their cards, even if their coolers weren’t as effective as larger ones. I follow every case release I can but have never paid attention to GPU limits until these last two generations. Idk what cases they’ll fit in (apparently define without HDD bays), but they certainly won’t fit in my FT02.

Double post, just watched the GN AIB preview, and just checked the define 7 compact and it barely fits the ASUS TUF 4090…. What are GPU manufacturers doing? What are nvidia’s alleged design limits when we’re already at 3+ slots and >12”/320mm and the ASUS Noctua design demonstrated you could do a lot better just by using better fans? SFF had shown it’s been a worthy design change for years now… why hasn’t it been implemented?
Posted on Reply
#515
AleXXX666
OneMoardo you not understand how taxes work ?
yes lol. but same as with Apple products, there is huge margin put, not taxes
Posted on Reply
#516
Valantar
AleXXX666yes lol. but same as with Apple products, there is huge margin put, not taxes
You seem to have a very, very simplistic view of the value chain of design, production, distribution and sales, and how taxes and fees play into this.
Posted on Reply
#517
SOAREVERSOR
AleXXX666yes lol. but same as with Apple products, there is huge margin put, not taxes
I'm going to assume you aren't using "margin put" as the investing term which is what it means and you're just saying apple has high margins. They don't. Most PC and electronics makes don't either. There's two ways they stay valid. The first is landing tons of corporate contracts where the real money is in support contracts on systems most people don't see. So a company like Dell or HP or lenovo doesn't stay floating off it's hardware, that's stupidly small margins. What happens is if you are a Dell shop for example you eat support contracts with them on the laptops, techs, service, certfications, and support.

All of this works this way. The thing about apple is it's a phone company, but it's cleaning house not via the phone but the app store. On the corporate side they aren't making money off the macs but they make a killing off support and software and other items. Gaming works this is way as well for everyone not Nintendo. Microsoft and Sony sell at a loss for a long time, though eventually they make a profit so little what matters is that it's not a loss. The truth is the clean up on the games they sell as they take a portion.

Hardware beyond selling chips is tiny margins. Even that is also only viable at scale.
Posted on Reply
#518
AleXXX666
SOAREVERSORI'm going to assume you aren't using "margin put" as the investing term which is what it means and you're just saying apple has high margins. They don't. Most PC and electronics makes don't either. There's two ways they stay valid. The first is landing tons of corporate contracts where the real money is in support contracts on systems most people don't see. So a company like Dell or HP or lenovo doesn't stay floating off it's hardware, that's stupidly small margins. What happens is if you are a Dell shop for example you eat support contracts with them on the laptops, techs, service, certfications, and support.

All of this works this way. The thing about apple is it's a phone company, but it's cleaning house not via the phone but the app store. On the corporate side they aren't making money off the macs but they make a killing off support and software and other items. Gaming works this is way as well for everyone not Nintendo. Microsoft and Sony sell at a loss for a long time, though eventually they make a profit so little what matters is that it's not a loss. The truth is the clean up on the games they sell as they take a portion.

Hardware beyond selling chips is tiny margins. Even that is also only viable at scale.
i meant retailers at most, not the manufacturers.
Posted on Reply
#519
Valantar
AleXXX666i meant retailers at most, not the manufacturers.
Having worked in electronics retail for about a decade total, I can tell you for a fact that Apple products are some of the lowest margin products you'll find in any electronics store (though game consoles are typically worse). Apple also tends to control distributor margins to a higher extent than other brands.
Posted on Reply
#520
AleXXX666
ValantarHaving worked in electronics retail for about a decade total, I can tell you for a fact that Apple products are some of the lowest margin products you'll find in any electronics store (though game consoles are typically worse). Apple also tends to control distributor margins to a higher extent than other brands.
still, $999 in US magically turns into like EUR1299 in EU lmfao
Posted on Reply
#521
Valantar
AleXXX666still, $999 in US magically turns into like EUR1299 in EU lmfao
... Yes, because most EU countries have 19-25% VAT (us MSRPs are without any form of tax), and the US is the largest single market for electronics (outside of China), meaning the economies of scale of a single language single market are much more present than anywhere in the EU. This really isn't complicated, and requires absolutely zero conspiratorial thinking to make add up. This is literally what I meant when I said it seems you have a very simplistic view of these systems.
Posted on Reply
#522
AleXXX666
Valantar... Yes, because most EU countries have 19-25% VAT (us MSRPs are without any form of tax), and the US is the largest single market for electronics (outside of China), meaning the economies of scale of a single language single market are much more present than anywhere in the EU. This really isn't complicated, and requires absolutely zero conspiratorial thinking to make add up. This is literally what I meant when I said it seems you have a very simplistic view of these systems.
i don't understand posting prices before taxes. it's like telling you salary in gross you will be like wow then you see what you get to your hands and understand your great illusions were BS lol
Posted on Reply
#523
cvaldes
AleXXX666i don't understand posting prices before taxes. it's like telling you salary in gross you will be like wow then you see what you get to your hands and understand your great illusions were BS lol
Tax rates vary depending on jurisdiction.

Using a US example, California has a statewide sales tax rate of 7.25% but individual counties (sometimes cities) often have their own sales tax so the rate in San Francisco (City and County), South San Francisco (San Mateo County), and Cupertino (Santa Clara County) might all be different (in fact, they are).

In the same way, EU member nations have their own tax rates.

A company like NVIDIA doesn't know where Reader X lives and where he/she will be buying Product A. And tax rates change.

Same thing with income taxes. Whatever exemptions and deductions you claim are probably different than everyone else's. Married people have different tax rates than single people. Some states have their own income tax (like California) while others do not (like neighboring Oregon).

I agree with Valantar that you have a very simplistic view of these systems.
Posted on Reply
#524
lexluthermiester
AleXXX666i don't understand posting prices before taxes.
Because sales taxes in the US are handled on a region by region basis. Some places in the US don't have sales tax at all. It would be INSANELY difficult to try posting prices including sales tax here. Does that make sense?
AleXXX666it's like telling you salary in gross you will be like wow then you see what you get to your hands and understand your great illusions were BS lol
It's not illusion, it's practicality. Everyone who lives in a region were sales taxes are collected, knows or has easy access to what those tax rates are and can easily calculate or estimate. For example if the price before taxes is $499 and there is a 6% tax the calculation would go something like 499 X 1.06 = 528.94. It's not magic or a conspiracy and it's not difficult for a person to do.
Posted on Reply
#525
DeathtoGnomes
cvaldesUsing a US example, California has a statewide sales tax rate of 7.25% but individual counties (sometimes cities) often have their own sales tax so the rate in San Francisco (City and County), South San Francisco (San Mateo County), and Cupertino (Santa Clara County) might all be different (in fact, they are).
15 feet seprate me and a 6% city tax in addition to State and/or Federal. People lie about their addresses just to avoid those taxes.

But how did this thread become about taxes? Not everyone is grown up (read: OLD FART) enough to know how taxes work, I still get confused...:nutkick:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 5th, 2025 21:36 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts