Monday, September 26th 2022

Intel Arc A770 Reviews Could Hit Early-October

Reviews of the Intel Arc A770 Limited Edition desktop graphics card could hit the web by October 5, according to a VideoCardz report. These could succeed unboxing articles without performance numbers, on September 30. Press reviews of the A770 publishing on October 5 could mean that retail availability isn't too far behind, and we could hear more about this later today at the IntelON Innovation online event, where the company is widely expected to announce its 13th Gen Core "Raptor Lake" desktop processors. The Arc A770 Limited Edition maxes out the 6 nm ACM-G10 silicon, features 32 Xe Cores, 512 XMX matrix processors, and 512 EUs, which work out to 4,096 unified shaders. The card comes with 8 GB or 16 GB of 17.5 Gbps GDDR6 memory across a 256-bit wide memory bus. Given that Intel is extensively comparing the A770 to the GeForce RTX 3070, one can expect a price competitive to that (around $500).
Source: VideoCardz
Add your own comment

39 Comments on Intel Arc A770 Reviews Could Hit Early-October

#2
lexluthermiester
AlwaysHopeI look forward to this! :)
Same here. With all the latest shenanigans NVidia has been pulling, I've been looking for other options. Radeon is good. But it's nice to have another choice and Intel seems to be making excellent progress!
Posted on Reply
#3
cadaveca
My name is Dave
lexluthermiesterSame here. With all the latest shenanigans NVidia has been pulling, I've been looking for other options. Radeon is good. But it's nice to have another choice and Intel seems to be making excellent progress!
you choosing the blue pill is funny. :p

Pretty eager to get my hands on one of these though, that's for sure.
Posted on Reply
#5
Jimmy_
Finally... they shifted to "could"
Posted on Reply
#6
Hyderz
does intel have something to compete in the high end?
if they dont then thats good, keep the fight in the mid and keep the price lower than competition and it should sell well
Posted on Reply
#7
lexluthermiester
cadavecayou choosing the blue pill is funny. :p
Yeah, it feels weird too. :laugh:
Hyderzdoes intel have something to compete in the high end?
Not that they've talked about. Remember this is their first real go in the GPU market. Give them a generation or two to muster something in that level of performance. I suspect that they'll have something that can compete in a year or two, but that's only based on what they've done so far which is good progress and encouraging.
Hyderzif they dont then thats good, keep the fight in the mid and keep the price lower than competition and it should sell well
That could very well be their starting strategy and I agree, it would be a good thing.

Time will tell, but so far things look very promising.
Posted on Reply
#8
RJARRRPCGP
Price looks reasonable for the specs, too. No worse than when I got my RX 6600 XT in very-late-March of 2022, when the prices were high, but not "unobtanium", like it was in '21.
Posted on Reply
#9
ZoneDymo
Hyderzdoes intel have something to compete in the high end?
if they dont then thats good, keep the fight in the mid and keep the price lower than competition and it should sell well
While I understand the ermm flaw in human thinking that "expensive = quality" so they have to be careful there, it would be immensely valuable for them to indeed undercut the competition heavily while preforming better so as to make it so that really, it would not be choice to go for intel.

because the information from the customers would be of immense value for intel going forward.
Posted on Reply
#10
Hyderz
ZoneDymoWhile I understand the ermm flaw in human thinking that "expensive = quality" so they have to be careful there, it would be immensely valuable for them to indeed undercut the competition heavily while preforming better so as to make it so that really, it would not be choice to go for intel.

because the information from the customers would be of immense value for intel going forward.
also it depends on how they price it, dont wanna put it too low to make ppl think its cheap but also what intel package it with their gpu...
i cant think of top of my head but things like xess and stuff to compete with nvidia and amd..
Posted on Reply
#11
AusWolf
Good, looking forward to it. :)

It seems it's gonna be the battle of the 7s for me this time around. Either I'll buy an A770 for my Core i7, or build a new system with a R7 7700X and RX 7700 XT.
Posted on Reply
#12
Bwaze
Hyderzdoes intel have something to compete in the high end?
if they dont then thats good, keep the fight in the mid and keep the price lower than competition and it should sell well
The problem is, this was meant to compete with high end two generations ago. Then with mid to high end Ampere. Now it's more low to midrange Ampere, at that generation's end. The card wasn't built to be midrange, nothing about It is midrange, except for performance - it has large die, 16 GB of costly memory, high TDP...
Posted on Reply
#13
Space Lynx
Astronaut
Looking forward to W1zzard's review on this one!!! :rockout: :rockout: :rockout:
Honestly if the price is right... and avaiability is good, hey you never know. Extra competition is always good, and since Nvidia no longer exists for my price range... really need Intel to give AMD some balance.
Posted on Reply
#15
lexluthermiester
ZoneDymoWhile I understand the ermm flaw in human thinking that "expensive = quality" so they have to be careful there, it would be immensely valuable for them to indeed undercut the competition heavily while preforming better so as to make it so that really, it would not be choice to go for intel.

because the information from the customers would be of immense value for intel going forward.
Nah, the reviews will prove the value at that price. If the card underperforms, then the value will not be as good. If it performs on or near the claimed level, the value will be good and Intel will be competing well. If the performance exceeds expectations then Intel will likely make mountains of money and force AMD & NVidia to rethink their market positions.
Posted on Reply
#16
Space Lynx
Astronaut
lexluthermiesterNah, the reviews will prove the value at that price. If the card underperforms, then the value will not be as good. If it performs on or near the claimed level, the value will be good and Intel will be competing well. If the performance exceeds expectations then Intel will likely make mountains of money and force AMD & NVidia to rethink their market positions.
I want to see what it gets running something like Dragon Age Origins at 1440p. If it can hit 120 fps+ i'd be interested in it. I'm not interested in latest AAA's, I just want to play my backlog of games at a high refresh and at 1440p. but also - I want the capability to play something like Cyberpunk 2077 at a respectable 90 fps range 1440p.

W1zz probably won't test Dragon Age Origins though... :roll:
Posted on Reply
#17
lexluthermiester
CallandorWoTW1zz probably won't test Dragon Age Origins though... :roll:
Perhaps not, but what he does test with will give you insight as to what you can expect in that game.
Posted on Reply
#18
Bwaze
Intel ARC cards really have a lot against them. BAR will be kind of mandatory, which excludes all older systems.

Inconsistencies between games and engines will be much greater than with competition - and some aren't just driver based, there is clear architectural difference. Focusing just on things that do work well can give a very skewed picture.

And then there are bugs in games, and non functional extras marketing really pushed. Sure, it's early, although at this point some markets have had ARC cards for months. But can you gamble and buy a card, and then find out Intel decided to focus their effort on next generation, or abandon the discrete gaming altogether and focus in compute / professional graphics?

And the pricing. Right now Nvidia and AMD cards are still overpriced, since they have just returned from stratosphere to about MSRP (and in some markets not even that). And low and midrange where Intel will compete is the worst in that regard. But that must change with arrival of next gen AMD and Nvidia cards in the coming months. So it makes sense to compare prices now only if you must buy really soon, otherwise it will be much better to wait.
Posted on Reply
#19
Space Lynx
Astronaut
BwazeIntel ARC cards really have a lot against them. BAR will be kind of mandatory, which excludes all older systems.
What do you mean BAR excludes older games? Like if I try to run Civilization III, the game simply won't launch with BAR on? or the fps will just dip sometimes since it wasn't made with that in mind?
Posted on Reply
#21
purplekaycee
Can the Intel Arc Gpus really put up with Nvidia and AMD?
Posted on Reply
#22
lexluthermiester
purplekayceeCan the Intel Arc Gpus really put up with Nvidia and AMD?
The reviews and benchmarks will tell the ultimate story, but it seems very likely.
Posted on Reply
#23
AusWolf
purplekayceeCan the Intel Arc Gpus really put up with Nvidia and AMD?
In price, absolutely! Nvidia for example, has nothing for $330 at the moment. In performance, we'll see in the reviews. Personally, I think they will be a good bargain considering their targeted price point.
Posted on Reply
#24
Bwaze
AusWolfIn price, absolutely! Nvidia for example, has nothing for $330 at the moment. In performance, we'll see in the reviews. Personally, I think they will be a good bargain considering their targeted price point.
Would you really call an Intel card with $329 MSRP and an unknown street price "a bargain", and Nvidia RTX 3060 for MSRP of $329 and a street price of $350 as too expensive?

Remember, you loose a lot of performance if you use Intel card in a system without BAR. So, no updating of old systems. Or if the game you're playing is too old, or based on an old graphics engine. Or if it just has a bug right in that game.
Posted on Reply
#25
AusWolf
BwazeWould you really call an Intel card with $329 MSRP and an unknown street price "a bargain", and Nvidia RTX 3060 for MSRP of $329 and a street price of $350 as too expensive?
Considering that the A380 actually sells for its MSRP while I haven't seen any nvidia card anywhere near MSRP for a long time, I'd say yes.
BwazeRemember, you loose a lot of performance if you use Intel card in a system without BAR. So, no updating of old systems. Or if the game you're playing is too old, or based on an old graphics engine. Or if it just has a bug right in that game.
That's true, but that wasn't the question here. I personally have a Re-BAR enabled system (two of them in fact), so I'm talking from my point of view.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Sep 17th, 2024 02:57 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts