Monday, November 7th 2022
Alibaba Yitian 710 Expelled From SPEC Official Rankings, Committee Cites Lack of General Availability
When Alibaba announced the development of an Armv9-based processor, it claimed to be some of the most performant designs that the company has laid its hand on, claiming to win the SPEC 2017 CPU benchmark and place itself in the top spot for the world record. Reportedly, the Yitian 710 CPU was able to score an integer score of 440 points in SPECint2017, which is comparable to a dual-socket Xeon Platinum 8362 system. The SPEC 2017 benchmark represents an industry-standard suite of tests that have a combination of 43 different test scenarios that measure the performance of a specific processor. Alibaba's Yitian 710 was claiming to possess the performance target where it is the fastest CPU on the leaderboard, with one major flaw. The Chinese company hasn't mentioned this processor's lack of general availability, making its scoreboard efforts invalid.
As Alibaba plans to use its design almost exclusively in-house and maybe offer it to a few partners, the processor is not sold commercially. This is apparently a requirement for the SPEC CPU 2017 benchmark to be completed, so the SPEC committee has overruled the result to make it invalid, stating the following:
Source:
via Tom's Hardware
As Alibaba plans to use its design almost exclusively in-house and maybe offer it to a few partners, the processor is not sold commercially. This is apparently a requirement for the SPEC CPU 2017 benchmark to be completed, so the SPEC committee has overruled the result to make it invalid, stating the following:
SPEC CommitteeSPEC has determined that this result does not comply with the SPEC OSG Guidelines for General Availability and the SPEC CPU 2017 run and reporting rules. Specifically, the submitter has notified SPEC that General Availability requirements were not met.
9 Comments on Alibaba Yitian 710 Expelled From SPEC Official Rankings, Committee Cites Lack of General Availability
Company makes fastest, most superest dooperest chip in the world but nobody is allowed to buy it. I wonder if it's not as good as they say... <s/c>
TLDR for the lazy person above me: its obviously USA sanctions at fault here.
Wave of corruption claims crash into China's chip Big Fund • The Register
"The company notes that instances based on Yitian 710 processors offer 100 percent higher efficiency than existing AMD/Intel solutions; however, they don't have any useful data to back it up."
I mean 100 percent higher efficiency than wildly different AMD/intel sounds like something someone made up.
So would that chip qualify for vaporware label? or neverwasware?