Wednesday, November 23rd 2022

Announcing the TechPowerUp SSD Specs Database

We are announcing the latest addition to our PC enthusiast databases, the new TechPowerUp SSD Specs Database. Modeled along the lines of our immensely popular GPU Database, CPU Database, and hardware Reviews Database, the new SSD Specs Database, curated by Gabriel Ferraz, aims to be a definitive repository of information on solid-state drive (SSD) hardware specs, for all to freely access. Here, you'll find a growing collection of client SSD hardware specs across all relevant form-factors and information. The database also helps you identify multiple hardware revisions of the same SSD model, so you're aware of any bait-and-switch incidents, or vague specs by manufacturers.

The TechPowerUp SSD Specs Database has individual info pages on each capacity variant of an SSD model; besides any hardware variants it may have. You can have quick, actionable information on specs such as controller, NAND flash, DRAM cache, advanced NAND flash specs, interface, protocol, controller hardware specs, and known performance numbers from our testing. We are constantly adding new drives to this database, and you can help us grow, not just by suggesting improvements to the database itself, but for additions to the database, please reach out to the curator on the main page. But for now, enjoy what we've built for you!

TechPowerUp SSD Specs Database
Add your own comment

215 Comments on Announcing the TechPowerUp SSD Specs Database

#202
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
Guys, you think it's valid and a good choice to add External SSDs to our database?
Posted on Reply
#203
Wirko
GabrielLP14Guys, you think it's valid and a good choice to add External SSDs to our database?
For high end SSDs, where you can be pretty certain that you'll always get the same guts inside, or the manufacturer even specifies what's in there, my vote is yes.

But what about average models? I don't know, just guessing that the variability of components is similar to what we've seen in the infamous SX8200 Pro, therefore it makes little sense to gather detailed data about the chips.
Posted on Reply
#204
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
WirkoFor high end SSDs, where you can be pretty certain that you'll always get the same guts inside, or the manufacturer even specifies what's in there, my vote is yes.

But what about average models? I don't know, just guessing that the variability of components is similar to what we've seen in the infamous SX8200 Pro, therefore it makes little sense to gather detailed data about the chips.
Yeah, but we're starting to see even more SSDs with combined solutions (Controller + Bridge Chip) in a single package
@W1zzard told ya
Posted on Reply
#205
Dwarden
i'm all for data on external SSD, if they get extra advanced filter (like external / internal ) and it's really more than just the internal drive in external package
Posted on Reply
#206
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
Dwardeni'm all for data on external SSD, if they get extra advanced filter (like external / internal ) and it's really more than just the internal drive in external package
thats a great idea :D
Posted on Reply
#207
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
By any chance, does anyone saw any SK Hynix X31 review with decent PCB photos?
Posted on Reply
#208
S456
GabrielLP14Will do, i just have a few first to add then i'll focus on those as well


www.techpowerup.com/ssd-specs/kingspec-ne-series-128-gb.d1330
Will start adding some Silicon Power SSDs today
Almost 1 year later, still wondering if any of my findings will be added (e.g. Patriot Burst Elite, sent in zip in private message) :p
Posted on Reply
#209
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
S456Almost 1 year later, still wondering if any of my findings will be added (e.g. Patriot Burst Elite, sent in zip in private message) :p
Thats all my fault, i apologise, i had so many on the list that i forgot to add, i`m adding it today, i`ve just added teh 1.92TB which is SM2259XT + IMFT`s 64-Layer QLC
Posted on Reply
#210
S456
Found a different variant of the MX500 500GB when I opened it up:
B16A, but 4x1Tbit NW913 (MT29F1T08EMHAFJ4-3R:A) instead of 8x512Gbit.
Except the NAND differences, it is the same as this: www.techpowerup.com/ssd-specs/crucial-mx500-500-gb.d76
(Same controller: SM2258H, and DRAM: D9SHD)
PCB is quite small.
Posted on Reply
#212
CyberneticTitan
Hi, long time SSD database user, first time poster.

I have a 2TB Adata Gammix S11 Pro bought late 2020, and would like to add the following to the database. As far as I can tell, this combo does not exist on the S11 or SX8200 Pro lists.

SMI Utility output below:

SMI NVME SSD flash id v0.272a by Ochkin Vadim
OS: 10.0 build 22000
0: (WDC WD20EZRZ-00Z5HB0
1: (XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro
Please select drive number:1
Drive : 1(NVME)
Scsi : 1
IOCtl: NVME_OF failed 0x45d!
Driver : W10
Model : XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro
Fw : 42B4S9NA
Size : 1953514 MB [2048.4 GB]
LBA Size : 512
Controller: SM2262EN [SM2262BA]
FW revision: 42B4S9NA
ROM version: 2262B0ROM:SVN047
Bank00: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank01: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank02: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank03: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank04: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank05: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank06: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank07: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank08: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank09: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank10: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank11: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank12: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank13: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank14: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank15: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank16: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank17: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank18: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank19: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank20: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank21: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank22: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank23: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank24: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank25: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank26: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank27: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank28: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank29: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank30: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Bank31: 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
--- FW params ---
FlashID : 0xec,0x1e,0x98,0x3f,0x84,0xcb,0x0,0x0 - Samsung 3dv4-64L TLC 16k 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
Channel : 8
Ch map : 0xFF
CE map : 0x0F
Pages/Block : 768
First Fblock : 1
Total Fblock : 2874
Bad Block From Pretest: 15
Start TLC/MLC Fblock : 137
DRAM Info : [0x45 0x62]
DRAM Size,MB : 2048 (possible incorrect)
DRAM Bus,bit : 32
DRAM Type : DDR4
DRAM Vendor : Samsung
UEFI OROM : Disable
Telemetry v8

Press any key to exit or Space to open full text report
Please share reports as text, not a sreenshot!

I would also like to report that a 4TB variant of the Lexar Ares drive exists, and comes with MAP1602A and four chips of the same YMTC 232-layer NAND (single-side). I bought two of these drives from Aliexpress.
Posted on Reply
#213
S456
Anyone know what NAND this is?
TSEF64BP3FH1K1
It can be seen in the picture here.
Have also seen it on a 120GB SSD (2x512Gb) recently. They are re-marked, I think.
Flash ID (for the 120GB SATA SSD) says:
From ATA id: 0x2c,0xc3,0x8,0x32,0xea,0x30,0x0,0x0 - Micron 176L(B47R) TLC 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
... but I am not sure if this is correct. I cannot get proper output from flash_id.
Posted on Reply
#214
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
S456Anyone know what NAND this is?
TSEF64BP3FH1K1
It can be seen in the picture here.
Have also seen it on a 120GB SSD (2x512Gb) recently. They are re-marked, I think.
Flash ID (for the 120GB SATA SSD) says:
From ATA id: 0x2c,0xc3,0x8,0x32,0xea,0x30,0x0,0x0 - Micron 176L(B47R) TLC 512Gb/CE 512Gb/die
... but I am not sure if this is correct. I cannot get proper output from flash_id.
The "TSEF64BP3FH1K1" is a rebranded NAND Flash.
From what i can tell it is in fact Micron's B47R 512Gb die
Posted on Reply
#215
GabrielLP14
SSD DB Maintainer
For those interested, i just published a new video overclocking an SSD:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jun 29th, 2024 17:12 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts