Thursday, January 19th 2023

ASRock Returns to its Roots with Wacky X670 Upgrade Card

For those that don't remember the early days of ASRock, the company started out making some rather unusual motherboards, often with some wild and wacky upgrade paths, such as both a slot and a socket for a CPU or both AGP and PCIe graphics card slots. Since then, ASRock has become a much more mainstream motherboard maker, but the company appears to have gone back to its roots with what the company calls the X670 Xpansion Kit. Right now, the expansion card appears to be working with the B650 LiveMixer motherboard and it's unknown if it's compatible with other models from ASRock. It seems to be limited to ASRock motherboards only, due to the fact that the add-in card requires not only a x4 PCIe slot with all lanes attached, on the motherboard, but also a custom cable that is most likely for "low-speed" I/O's such as I2C, SPI and so on.

As the name suggests, the X670 Xpansion Kit allows B650 motherboards to be turned into X670 motherboards, more or less. The card is home to a second chipset, which enables not only two additional M.2 slots for PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs, but it also features two SATA ports, a 10 Gbps USB-C port, three USB-A ports and—maybe most interestingly—a 10 Gbps Ethernet interface. It's unclear if this will be a retail product, but the card provided to Level1Techs doesn't appear to be an engineer unit, but a full retail ready product. It's definitely an interesting upgrade path for those that have invested in a B650 motherboard and there's no real reason why this shouldn't work as well as having the second chipset on the motherboard, especially as ASRock appears to have fitted a signal re-driver on the add-in card to make sure the PCIe signals are handled properly.
Sources: Level1Techs, via VideoCardz
Add your own comment

72 Comments on ASRock Returns to its Roots with Wacky X670 Upgrade Card

#26
ymdhis
LabRat 891Reminds me of:


^not mine. Pulled off Vogons forums.
Yes, that's a PCIe HD 4850, in a PCIE-PCI bridging adapter, in an AGP-> 32-bit PCI 66Mhz adapter, in some ancient AGP mobo, w/ a K6-III...
(I consider many of these bridge chips basically "add-on Southbridges". The article's subject card, also is essentially a 'add-on Southbridge'.)
would be more impressive with a HD4650 which had a native AGP version, but iirc the voltage keying has been different on the AGP port since like the 2000s and it wouldn't natively fit on a board like that. (I actually have a super socket 7 motherboard that I've been meaning to put it together for so long, so I could check this right now)

Also, nice cpu, the K6-III was very rare.
thewanThis is why everything should be gen 5 now. Limit gpu to x8 or even x4, m2 to x2, and have expansions galore with minimal performance loss. Dear ppl of TPU. Stop saying that higher pcie gens are pointless. You all lack imagination and out of the box thinking. If we don't need all those bandwidth, then reduce the lanes to add more stuff! We all could use more m.2 storage, as in we could use MOAR TBs. MOAR fast USBs. MOAR 2.5G or even 10G ethernets. MOAR imagination pls ppl. Use your brains MOAR.
While I wish this was true, the average person simply doesn't need that many ports, and if you are a power user who needs several 10G ports, go get a threadripper.
Posted on Reply
#27
OneMoar
There is Always Moar
this is so hilariously stupid .....
Posted on Reply
#28
Wirko
thewanWe all could use more m.2 storage, as in we could use MOAR TBs. MOAR fast USBs. MOAR 2.5G or even 10G ethernets. MOAR imagination pls ppl. Use your brains MOAR.
More speed = more of the same. You mentioned imagimation?
Posted on Reply
#29
chrcoluk
thewanThis is why everything should be gen 5 now. Limit gpu to x8 or even x4, m2 to x2, and have expansions galore with minimal performance loss. Dear ppl of TPU. Stop saying that higher pcie gens are pointless. You all lack imagination and out of the box thinking. If we don't need all those bandwidth, then reduce the lanes to add more stuff! We all could use more m.2 storage, as in we could use MOAR TBs. MOAR fast USBs. MOAR 2.5G or even 10G ethernets. MOAR imagination pls ppl. Use your brains MOAR.
Not completely pointless, the issue is the cost of gen5, its effectively a mb tax. So should be optional.

All of what you said is fine if you dont care about $$$.

I like the product, lets people buy into new AMD chipset at lower pricepoint, then upgrade connectivity later without ripping out board, far from pointless, kind of like starting with less ram in 2 dimms then upgrading later.
Posted on Reply
#30
WonkoTheSaneUK
I used to have one of Asrock's AGP/PCIe motherboards. It might still be in a box somewhere in the attic.

This card bears further investigation and followage.
Posted on Reply
#31
[XC] Oj101
ASRock is clearly allowing the use of LSD at work for the first time in 15 years and I LOVE IT.
Posted on Reply
#32
Tek-Check
LabRat 891...and here I am dreaming about slotting this into the CPU-connected Gen4.0 M.2 slot (via adapter) on my X570. Generational Hybridization :D
Would this ever work on AM4?
Posted on Reply
#33
Wirko
[XC] Oj101ASRock is clearly allowing the use of LSD at work for the first time in 15 years and I LOVE IT.
Yeah, and maybe Asus contracted them to make that DDR5-to-DDR4 adapter.
Tek-CheckWould this ever work on AM4?
With proper driver support, I see no reason it couldn't work on an Intel 775 board. Seriously. It's just PCIe.
Posted on Reply
#34
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
Oh hell yeah I remember when Asrock was more innovative than other manufacturers combined. AGP/PCIe boards, expansion slots for CPU upgrade cards and all kinds of crazy stuff. :)
Posted on Reply
#35
TheinsanegamerN
thewanThis is why everything should be gen 5 now. Limit gpu to x8 or even x4, m2 to x2, and have expansions galore with minimal performance loss. Dear ppl of TPU. Stop saying that higher pcie gens are pointless. You all lack imagination and out of the box thinking. If we don't need all those bandwidth, then reduce the lanes to add more stuff! We all could use more m.2 storage, as in we could use MOAR TBs. MOAR fast USBs. MOAR 2.5G or even 10G ethernets. MOAR imagination pls ppl. Use your brains MOAR.
You can add that all with the PCIe busses these motherboards already have.

Dear thewan, maybe learn how computers work kthnx.
Posted on Reply
#36
Assimilator
Tek-CheckWould this ever work on AM4?
No.
WirkoWith proper driver support, I see no reason it couldn't work on an Intel 775 board. Seriously. It's just PCIe.
Did you completely fail to see the connector jutting out from the card that very evidently need to be joined to a specific connector on the board? A connector that your Intel LGA775 board absolutely won't have?
Posted on Reply
#37
Zareek
AssimilatorNo.


Did you completely fail to see the connector jutting out from the card that very evidently need to be joined to a specific connector on the board? A connector that your Intel LGA775 board absolutely won't have?
I agree, very doubtful that SPI/I2C connector is part of the magic in making this thing work. It probably also requires specific UEFI support you'll only get on motherboards that support it.

Still, very cool idea! So cool, I'm wondering it that card works with a less ugly motherboard. I might just buy one of these and a compatible motherboard to support the idea and innovation. I don't care if it costs more than an comparable X670 board. We need more of this sort of innovation!
Posted on Reply
#38
DeeJay1001
If the price is right I kind of like this as a solution to segment their products in the market. They can focus on affordable B series motherboards that fit the needs of most customers at a great price. For users that need more expansion and functionality they can simply buy the add-on board.
Posted on Reply
#39
Aleksandar_038
Actually, ASRock might have right idea with this...

AMD AM5 is crazy expensive - and when we disregard MB manufacturers greed, lack of competition, useless flashy thingies, still we have high complexity of the boards that indeed drives prices up.

So, we could have basic board with one M2 port, one PCIe port for graphics, two SATA ports for cheap... than with add-on card you get another set of ports, etc, etc... Instead we have expensive B650 and completely useless A620 and no-man land between.

We only have problem with ATX being so obsolete that it is painful to watch...
Posted on Reply
#40
TheLostSwede
News Editor
ZareekI agree, very doubtful that SPI/I2C connector is part of the magic in making this thing work. It probably also requires specific UEFI support you'll only get on motherboards that support it.

Still, very cool idea! So cool, I'm wondering it that card works with a less ugly motherboard. I might just buy one of these and a compatible motherboard to support the idea and innovation. I don't care if it costs more than an comparable X670 board. We need more of this sort of innovation!
Without the additional connectivity, how do you expect the rest of the system are going to be able to send things like sync signals for timing transmissions from one chipset to the other?

If you haven't noticed, all of the Thunderbolt add-in cards require something similar as well and although no board maker, nor Intel has shared exactly what interfaces are used, SPI, I2C, LPC, etc. are said to be possible options, as they're commonly used for this type of signalling.

But yes, UEFI support is obviously also required.
Posted on Reply
#41
Assimilator
TheLostSwedeWithout the additional connectivity, how do you expect the rest of the system are going to be able to send things like sync signals for timing transmissions from one chipset to the other?

If you haven't noticed, all of the Thunderbolt add-in cards require something similar as well and although no board maker, nor Intel has shared exactly what interfaces are used, SPI, I2C, LPC, etc. are said to be possible options, as they're commonly used for this type of signalling.

But yes, UEFI support is obviously also required.
I strongly doubt that Intel would allow their darling, premium Thunderbolt to use something so common as an industry-standard protocol. Most likely they've written something proprietary in all the worst ways, then wrapped it up in some sort of encryption scheme.
Posted on Reply
#42
TheLostSwede
News Editor
AssimilatorI strongly doubt that Intel would allow their darling, premium Thunderbolt to use something so common as an industry-standard protocol. Most likely they've written something proprietary in all the worst ways, then wrapped it up in some sort of encryption scheme.
I guess that's possible as well, but the point was that the Thunderbolt add-in cards have that extra cable for some kind of "low-speed" interface.
Posted on Reply
#43
OneMoar
There is Always Moar
TheLostSwedeWithout the additional connectivity, how do you expect the rest of the system are going to be able to send things like sync signals for timing transmissions from one chipset to the other?

If you haven't noticed, all of the Thunderbolt add-in cards require something similar as well and although no board maker, nor Intel has shared exactly what interfaces are used, SPI, I2C, LPC, etc. are said to be possible options, as they're commonly used for this type of signalling.

But yes, UEFI support is obviously also required.
attention you are being charged with being WRONG on the internet
how do you plea:

the thunderbolt 3 spec is open and has been publicly avaiable since 2017
the 'thunderbolt certification' is whats closed also usb4 pretty much cross covers both

this is stupid this entire product is assinine because you don't just add a south bridge over pci-e and magicly add more connections to the cpu
which is what you need for this to matter
Posted on Reply
#44
sLowEnd
Wow, it's been years since I last saw Asrock do something weird like this. lol

Their DDR2+DDR3 boards and the boards with both AGP and PCI-e back in the day were neat.

Edit: Or this board with both S478 and LGA775 lol
www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/P4%20Combo/index.asp
Posted on Reply
#45
trsttte
OneMoarattention you are being charged with being WRONG on the internet
how do you plea:

the thunderbolt 3 spec is open and has been publicly avaiable since 2017
the 'thunderbolt certification' is whats closed also usb4 pretty much cross covers both
Cool story but that has nothing to do with what he said. The thunderbolt 3 spec is open, the add-in board implementation with the extra aux control header not so much with different implementations and some people even being able to run thunderbolt cards with no header at all.
Posted on Reply
#46
ypsylon
Like Wendell said: This should be for any board.

Even HEDT-segment ones. 101% agree with this. Its brilliant idea.

Can you imagine (sadly now dead-end) TRX40 boards with two x8 cards like those? Extra 8 M.2s, 2 10Gb NICs, stacks of USB, 8 SATA ports.
Posted on Reply
#47
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
I miss old asrock with PCI-E and AGP on the same board with DDR2 and DDR3
The CPU makers shut that down mostly as things moved more into the CPU, but they had some cool stuff



I just... i just want this as an x4 expansion card for everyone. That'd be sick.
Posted on Reply
#48
OneMoar
There is Always Moar
I don't understand why people are impressed with this
we stopped doing this 30 years ago because daughterboards are stupid
btw you can get all of this on a pci-e card no need for a seperate chipset

just slap a Usb4 Controler on a card add a 10g ethernet nic from realtek And a Pci-e PLX to drive the nvme bays



there is litterally zero need to have a seperate chipset on .... whatever this abomination is
Posted on Reply
#49
TheLostSwede
News Editor
OneMoarattention you are being charged with being WRONG on the internet
how do you plea:
Huh?
OneMoarthe thunderbolt 3 spec is open and has been publicly avaiable since 2017
the 'thunderbolt certification' is whats closed also usb4 pretty much cross covers both
Well, maybe you can dig up the specs that describe what other interfaces are used then instead of talking smack?
OneMoarthis is stupid this entire product is assinine because you don't just add a south bridge over pci-e and magicly add more connections to the cpu
which is what you need for this to matter
You're aware that the only difference between a B650 and an X670 motherboard is another identical chipset, which is connected to the primary chipset over a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface, right? How would this then not be exactly the same, just via an add-in card?

Maybe learn how things work before making daft comments?
OneMoarI don't understand why people are impressed with this
we stopped doing this 30 years ago because daughterboards are stupid
btw you can get all of this on a pci-e card no need for a seperate chipset
Not all chipsets support proper bifurcation, so...
OneMoarjust slap a Usb4 Controler on a card add a 10g ethernet nic from realtek And a Pci-e PLX to drive the nvme bays
PLX chips cost more than AMD/ASMedia's chipset. Plus this incorporates native support for more interfaces whereas the PLX chips are just PCIe bridges/splitters.
Realtek doesn't make 10 Gbps PHY's as yet.
OneMoarthere is litterally zero need to have a seperate chipset on .... whatever this abomination is
I guess you'll never get an X670 board either then?
Posted on Reply
#50
Flanker
Reminds me of Microsoft Mach 10 and Mach 20
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 19th, 2024 04:11 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts