Thursday, July 6th 2023

Two-ExaFLOP El Capitan Supercomputer Starts Installation Process with AMD Instinct MI300A

When Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) announced the creation of a two-ExaFLOP supercomputer named El Capitan, we heard that AMD would power it with its Instinct MI300 accelerator. Today, LNLL published a Tweet that states, "We've begun receiving & installing components for El Capitan, @NNSANews' first #exascale #supercomputer. While we're still a ways from deploying it for national security purposes in 2024, it's exciting to see years of work becoming reality." As published images show, HPE racks filled with AMD Instinct MI300 are showing up now at LNLL's facility, and the supercomputer is expected to go operational in 2024. This could mean that November 2023 TOP500 list update wouldn't feature El Capitan, as system enablement would be very hard to achieve in four months until then.

The El Capitan supercomputer is expected to run on AMD Instinct MI300A accelerator, which features 24 Zen4 cores, CDNA3 architecture, and 128 GB of HBM3 memory. All paired together in a four-accelerator configuration goes inside each node from HPE, also getting water cooling treatment. While we don't have many further details on the memory and storage of El Capitan, we know that the system will exceed two ExFLOPS at peak and will consume close to 40 MW of power.
Source: LNLL (Twitter)
Add your own comment

29 Comments on Two-ExaFLOP El Capitan Supercomputer Starts Installation Process with AMD Instinct MI300A

#26
dragontamer5788
TumbleGeorgeOff topic: Could someone explain to the others what percentage of the uranium contained in the fuel is actually "burned". The truth is that fuel is used quite inefficiently than in modern nuclear weapon...
Doesn't matter and doesn't matter though. Uranium is more common than tin in the Earth's Crust. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundance_of_elements_in_Earth's_crust

And one-kilogram of Uranium-235 contains as much energy as 100-tons of coal.

Yes, we only burn like 1% of it, but even with a 99% inefficiency ratio compared to a nuclear bomb. But "tiny number x 100" is still "tiny number". Uranium is like 100-kilograms of raw material mined vs 100,000-kilograms of other energy sources.
Posted on Reply
#27
kondamin
TumbleGeorgeOff topic: Could someone explain to the others what percentage of the uranium contained in the fuel is actually "burned". The truth is that fuel is used quite inefficiently than in modern nuclear weapon...
Practically nothing nuclear Fuel is made up of loads of different isotopes of uranium and sometimes some plutonium

after their stay in the reactor about 50% of the p239 and u235 will be used up.
but that only makes up a small percentage of the mox pellets
Posted on Reply
#28
Leiesoldat
lazy gamer & woodworker
People also forget that the fusion reaction obtained recently came from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Fusion modeling and subsequent calculations takes a lot of resources to calculate in a timely manner.

Remarks saying we don't need supercomputers at weapons labs are easy, but like the fusion calculations, applications to be used on these exascale machines are much more complex and have multiple use cases outside of the military: www.exascaleproject.org/research-group/national-security/.

Calculations for scenarios like re-entry to the Earth's atmosphere can be applied to designing more efficient vehicle geometry that dissipates heat more effectively or wastes less material replacing burnt tiles.
Posted on Reply
#29
Avro Arrow
Tek-CheckNuclear is clean as soon as you are not one of countries that needs to store nuclear waste for centuries...
It's not quite what you think it is...
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 19th, 2024 09:57 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts