Saturday, January 20th 2024

Detailed Intel Arrow Lake-S Platform Specifications Leaked, Confirms Native Thunderbolt 4 Support

Courtesy of X/Twitter user @yuuki_ans, we now have what should be very detailed information on Intel's next generation consumer desktop platform, assuming the leaked information is real. The leaker not only provided confirmation on the CPU specs of the Arrow Lake-S desktop CPUs, which will feature up to an 8+16+1 core configuration. However, it appears that it's not all smooth sailing for Intel to get Arrow Lake-S up and running, as a note points out that the pre-alpha hardware has the performance cores disabled due to a hardware bug that is expected to be fixed in a future hardware revision. We can also see that the official memory support is DDR5-6400 from the block diagram, which is quite a jump from DDR5-5600 which is what the current 14th gen CPUs officially support.

That said, the rest of the documentation shared is very detailed and provides us with a ton of details in terms of the various platform interfaces we can expect. For starters, the Arrow Lake-S CPUs will feature native Thunderbolt 4/USB4 support (once again an odd mistake here stating USB4.0), as well as DisplayPort 2.0 (UHBR20 only) and HDMI 2.1 support. The CPU is said to deliver 24 PCIe lanes, of which 16 are PCIe 5.0 lanes for the GPU and the remaining eight are for NVMe SSDs, with half being PCIe 5.0 and half PCIe 4.0.
The chipset which is expected to carry the 800-series naming will connect via a DMI Gen 4 interface with up to eight lanes to the CPU. Here we can apparently expect a further 24 PCIe 4.0 lanes, up to 10 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) ports, of which eight can be combined to offer USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps) ports instead. That said, there are some oddities in this leaked information that puts up some red flags. The above mentioned IA Cores and USB4.0 mistakes are odd and there's also a suggestion that the CPU should feature eight SATA 3.0 ports (muxed with PCIe) and the chipset featuring a further eight (also muxed). Furthermore WiFi support is only listed at 802.11ax R2 or WiFi 6E as it's now better known as, but that there will be Bluetooth 6 support in the same module.

Now keep in mind that we're looking at the specs for an Intel test platform here, so we might just be looking at a sloppy engineer that threw this document together to be able to send along some specs to Intel's partners that are getting boards to start to work on their UEFI implementations and board designs. That said, there are a few too many oddities in this leak to be able to say that the features are set in stone or even that it's a real leak, but it does reflect what is already known about Arrow Lake-S. As such, take this for what it is, namely an interesting look into what might be.
Sources: @yuuki_ans, via VideoCardz
Add your own comment

35 Comments on Detailed Intel Arrow Lake-S Platform Specifications Leaked, Confirms Native Thunderbolt 4 Support

#26
TheLostSwede
News Editor
WirkoEpycs, Threadrippers and Xeons are all really good when it comes to PCIe 5.0 lane splitting, with Xeons being a bit inferior. But consumer stuff? Intel has 8+8+4 and AMD has 8+8+4+4 if we count all PCIe 5.0 lanes available in the system. The 5.0 x4 ports don't allow further splitting (I've never seen it documented anywhere) and the 5.0 x8 ports (two halves of the PEG bus) may allow splitting to x4. Neither Intel nor AMD mandate that, so the support depends on the motherboard manufacturers.

And I think bifurcation is becoming/will become more appealing now that we have 5.0. "I don't need the ultimate speed, I need the lanes!" is an opinion I've often seen expressed here at TPU forums. Those who need the lanes actually need the ability to connect many devices, SSDs, graphics cards, network cards, basically to squeeze out workstation-level connectivity from a consumer desktop system.

The splitter you linked to ... it's unclear if it's a passive splitter or it has a PCIe bridge chip onboard. The price difference is huge if we're talking PCIe 5.0 or 4.0.
You need to learn to differentiate between something that is possible and what the motherboard makers implement, the two aren't the same.
Several AMD boards have x2 electrically connected x16 slots for example, so it's very much doable to implement x2 interfaces on AMD and I presume Intel these days.

I also think you've misunderstood how PCIe and bifurcation works. Just because you go from PCIe 5.0 to PCIe 4.0 from a PCIe 5.0 interface, doesn't mean the eight lanes you split off, magically turns into 16 lanes without some kind of bridge chip in the middle. If this is what you want, then PCIe and/or bifurcation isn't going to do it, since neither was designed to do this.
Posted on Reply
#28
Tek-Check
WirkoAt the very least, the PCIe 5.0 x4 interfaces on the CPUs should support splitting to x2 + x2. Samsung's 990 Evo SSD, if it becomes a reality, is an indication that this is going to happen.
It works. 8500G and 8300G APU will be able to work in x4 slot as x2 device.
WirkoThe 5.0 x4 ports don't allow further splitting (I've never seen it documented anywhere)
Check new Gigabyte board B650 that supports new Zen4 APUs. Every NVMe slot supports both x4 and x2 connections.
www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/B650-GAMING-X-AX-rev-15/sp#sp
WirkoAnd I think bifurcation is becoming/will become more appealing now that we have 5.0. "I don't need the ultimate speed, I need the lanes!" is an opinion I've often seen expressed here at TPU forums. Those who need the lanes actually need the ability to connect many devices, SSDs, graphics cards, network cards, basically to squeeze out workstation-level connectivity from a consumer desktop system.
This is unrealistic expectation. If anyone wants "workstation-like connectivity", they need to buy a workstation system. Simple.
When X670E or Z790 chipsets are creatively implemented on a board, those allow for HEDT-like connectivity.
Top chipset consumer desktop system does not need to offer anything else.
Still want more connectivity? Pay for it.
Posted on Reply
#29
TheLostSwede
News Editor
TumbleGeorge"3 x GbE"? 3 x rj45?
At the cost of PCIe lanes. Just like it is with current platforms.

Posted on Reply
#30
Shonk
Its Fake

The PCH DMI link says DMI 3 x 8

thats weird Z690/Z790 is DMI 4 x 8


Posted on Reply
#31
TheLostSwede
News Editor
ShonkIts Fake

The PCH DMI link says DMI 3 x 8

thats weird Z690/Z790 is DMI 4 x 8


There are several weird issues, but if this is really for pre-Alpha hardware, I wouldn't be surprised if there were mistakes like this. I've pointed out a few more.
Posted on Reply
#32
Squared
ChippendaleWhat does the snip mean with 8 cores 16. Is it a max 8p core and 16 e core config? 125 watt tdp? what does the +1 mean?
Meteor Lake and Arrow Lake have very similar "tile" plans. Meteor Lake has the CPU memory controller on one tile and the CPU cores on another, which means that two pieces of silicon have to be active for any CPU task. This isn't ideal for idle power consumption, which is problematic especially in laptops. (This is probably why AMD still uses a monolithic die for their laptop APUs.) To address this problem, Meteor Lake has two additional "low power efficiency" CPU cores on the same tile as the memory controller, so that when idling the entire CPU tile can turn off but light CPU work can still be done. Meteor Lake's top model is 6p+8e+2lpe. So this Arrow Lake claim is that it has one low power efficiency core.
Posted on Reply
#33
persondb
If this holds any truth, this means that Arrow Lake platform could have better I/O than AM5.

At the average Motherboard they are probably the same though as Intel middle range chipsests (e.g. B-class) tend to only have DMI x4, so it will be 24 PCIe lanes direct from CPU + 4 PCH lanes, which is the same as AM5. The generations of the lanes are also the same with 20 Gen 5(if implemented as that) and 4 Gen 4.

The PCHs might have some variations in what lanes they provide but for peak performance in the end, they can only effectively provide bandwidth in total equal to x4 Gen 4 for both cases so it does not matter that much.

Intel however gets the advantage in I/O if TB4/USB4 are implemented, as since it's native to the CPU, it does not need to use any of the PCIe lanes from the CPU but AM5 does need(and that was one of the reasons why AMD gave an additional x4 lanes over AM4, to facilitate a discrete USB4 controller) a discrete USB4 controller connected to x4 lanes.

And then you have the PCH bandwidth advantage as with with x8 lanes using a H or Z chipset gives more leg for the downstream ports to stretch really. which will make a difference to those who are abusing their PCH connectivity to the max.

For the average person or gamer, it does not matter at all though, since this will really only pop up at super expensive boards that only people with real needs will buy.
Posted on Reply
#34
Nekajo
Is Arrow Lake confirmed to be made on the 20A node?
Posted on Reply
#35
Squared
NekajoIs Arrow Lake confirmed to be made on the 20A node?
That is what Intel has said, but Intel also said that Lunar Lake would succeed it on the 18A node, but now Intel says that Lunar Lake is in production even though 18A isn't scheduled to be in production yet and Intel has said that Arrow Lake and Lunar Lake will both come this year and has described the former as for the "enthusiast" market and the latter for the "mobile" market. But Intel claimed in the past that Arrow Lake would be 20A and more recently claimed that 20A is in production, those claims do line up to suggest that Arrow Lake is on track for release this year on 20A. I believe Intel has said or hinted that only the CPU tile will use the 20A node, similar to Meteor Lake and the Intel 4 node.

(Intel says that Lunar Lake has a different tile configuration from Meteor Lake and Arrow Lake. The rumor mill says that a 4p+4e CPU will be on the same tile as an Xe2 GPU, and that tile will be built on TSMC N3. Maybe Intel is trying to avoid criticism about Lunar Lake being built by TSMC until they have Arrow Lake ready to show off on their own node.)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 1st, 2025 17:59 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts