Monday, May 27th 2024

AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen 5 "Granite Ridge" Desktop Processors Launch Late-July

AMD's next-generation Ryzen 9000 series "Granite Ridge" desktop processors based on the "Zen 5" microarchitecture, is rumored to launch in late-July, 2024, according to multiple sources in the ChipHell tech forums. The first four SKUs in the processor series will include one each of 16-core, 12-core, 8-core, and 6-core, spanning the Ryzen 9, Ryzen 7, and Ryzen 5 series, just like the company's Ryzen 7000 series debut. The company could unveil these processors in its 2024 Computex keynote address early next month, talking about their features and performance in broad strokes, while we get technical previews in the run-up to the late-July launch.

A late-July launch of the Ryzen 9000 series "Granite Ridge" processors should also mean that the various motherboard manufacturers will showcase their upcoming motherboards based on the AMD X870 desktop chipset at Computex. Ryzen 9000 series are built in the existing Socket AM5 package, and should be compatible with existing AMD 600-series chipset motherboards. In fact, most motherboard vendors have already released UEFI firmware updates that include Ryzen 9000 series processor compatibility. Those buying a Ryzen 9000 series processor with an AMD 600-series chipset motherboard can simply take advantage of the USB BIOS Flashback feature that's available on most motherboards, including the entry-level ones.
Sources: ChipHell Forums, Videocardz
Add your own comment

83 Comments on AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen 5 "Granite Ridge" Desktop Processors Launch Late-July

#51
Tomorrow
kondaminWhy? having 4 slots allows you to just buy a second set of ram when the initial amount is no longer enough without you having to get rid of your first set.

I get by with 32GB right now, but I imagine that by this time next year and some windows updates I'll have to add 32 more to keep my current comfort
That was true in the DDR4 days where most common stick size was 8GB. With DDR5 most common stick size has doubled to 16GB and most people buy kits of two meaning 32GB. Unless you're into production work etc (in which case you buy higher capacity 48GB or 96GB kits from the get go) then 32GB will be enough for most people during the lifetime of AM5. Also like others have said it's not that simple to just add two more sticks without compatibility issues or speed decrease.
JWNoctisGetting to 6000MT/s or even 5000+MT/s is very difficult, if not impossible with 4 slots populated, it seems. The officially supported number for Zen 4 is DDR5-3600, and motherboards go up to 5000+ or thereabouts.
Exactly. Two DIMM boards help with maintaining those speeds and with 96GB now and hopefully 128GB kits of two available soon i just dont see the reason for four DIMM board like i did in the past.
Posted on Reply
#52
Tropick
wolfLets see if this is now enough to tempt me away from AM4 / 5800X3D, and as has been said, hopefully not a delayed launch for X3D products.
I'm driving my 5800X3D/6950XT build until the wheels fall off. I waited something like 8 years to upgrade to AM4 from my 4790k/980Ti and I'm hoping to get the same mileage out of my current rig :D
Posted on Reply
#53
ADB1979
holyprofthey will have around 7% more bandwidth on tap. All memory limited games will receive 5-7% FPS boost just because of that
It doesn't work like that. You can test this yourself on your own PC, find yourself a system memory bandwidth limited game, test it, drop your RAM bandwidth in your BIOS by 7%, retest and get back to us with the details of your system, the game tested etc and your results.
Posted on Reply
#54
AusWolf
dgianstefaniMy chip doesn't idle at 2-5 W. It idles at similar power as every other single CCD Zen 4 part, actually slightly more because several power saving features are disabled. So around 30 W. The temperature difference is due to the stock IHS having been replaced.
I was comparing to Intel, but fair enough. A 40 °C idle is still not the end of the world, though.
holyprofAs we all know, X3D cache makes up for lack of RAM speed (both latency and bandwidth). With the new Ryzens rumoured to support DDR5-6400, they will have around 7% more bandwidth on tap. All memory limited games will receive 5-7% FPS boost just because of that, not counting the massive 10% IPC promised.
So yes, I believe the Ryzen 7 9700X/9800X might not best the 7800X3D but will come very close in games. A quick glance on the TPU's Ryzen 7700X review tells me it beats the 5800X3D.
You must be extremely lucky to see 5-7% increase in game performance due to any increase in RAM bandwidth on X3D. 5-7% increase in RAM speed will mean nothing in games.
Posted on Reply
#55
AGlezB
AusWolfSame socket, same IHS, I'm afraid.
Hope aside, the only change I expect from 7000 to 9000 is a bit of performance improvement without too much extra heat. Fortunately, I'm in no rush to upgrade. If 9000 doesn't do it for me I can wait for the next one.

I'm also keeping an eye out for Intel 15th and 16th gen. For years their CPUs have reminded me of T. J. Miller's character in "Silicon Valley" (did something great in the past and then sat on their backsides to brag and stagnated) but that might change in the near future because they're finally doing something about it. Investing a few pennies ( :roll: ) in upgrading their fabs and buying ASML's best toys is bound to produce some results. I don't expect much from 15th gen but from 16th onwards I think we'll be seeing some noticeable improvements. I don't know if that will be enough to bring me back to Intel's side of the fence but we'll see.
WirkoThe IHS, on the other hand, is still a stamped piece of metal. It's not like the "nooks and crannies" are CNC-milled.
I know most CPUs have stamped IHSs but I'm not sure that's the case for Ryzen 7000. I did some searching but could not find anything at all related to their manufacturing. If you have a link to a factory tour video, an interview or anything specific about the 7000 ISH please share. Even better if you happen to have links to manufacturing blueprints/instructions.
Posted on Reply
#56
AusWolf
AGlezBHope aside, the only change I expect from 7000 to 9000 is a bit of performance improvement without too much extra heat. Fortunately, I'm in no rush to upgrade. If 9000 doesn't do it for me I can wait for the next one.
Single generational upgrades are never worth it (unless your hobby is PC building and testing out new parts).
Posted on Reply
#57
ADB1979
AGlezBHope aside, the only change I expect from 7000 to 9000 is a bit of performance improvement without too much extra heat. Fortunately, I'm in no rush to upgrade. If 9000 doesn't do it for me I can wait for the next one.
If whatever you do uses AVX512 instructions then you will be pleasantly surprised and might want to upgrade because the increase in performance is going to be huge, but only for AVX512 workloads whilst everything else is going to be the kind of generational increase we have seen in recent years.

Personally I am going to take a look at this and decide whether I want to jump in, or wait for Zen 6 or if Intel actually has something good in 2025/2026. Jim Keller is behind the "Royal" (internal codename) concept and core architecture of the upcoming Intel core designs, but the first one of these wont have hyper-threading on the P cores and is the first step into the new architecture, the second version "should" have hyper-threading and be the one to look for. The "royal" architecture is specifically targetting single threaded performance, so "should" be great for games and things that thrive on single threaded performance above anything else (anything made by Adobe for example), so Intel might end up in my next PC upgrade if they actually pull this off and I don't need to have my PC directly attached to a nuclear reactor to power it.
Posted on Reply
#58
Wirko
AGlezB. know most CPUs have stamped IHSs but I'm not sure that's the case for Ryzen 7000. I did some searching but could not find anything at all related to their manufacturing. If you have a link to a factory tour video, an interview or anything specific about the 7000 ISH please share. Even better if you happen to have links to manufacturing blueprints/instructions.
You're right. It looks like a casting. As pure copper is not suitable for casting, it must be an alloy. Its thermal conductivity depends on the type of alloy, but certainly isn't higher than that of pure copper.
Posted on Reply
#59
AGlezB
ADB1979If whatever you do uses AVX512 instructions then you will be pleasantly surprised and might want to upgrade because the increase in performance is going to be huge, but only for AVX512 workloads whilst everything else is going to be the kind of generational increase we have seen in recent years.
I'm not sure I'd notice if someone came at night and disabled all AVX512 instructions in my CPU. :confused:
Posted on Reply
#60
Wirko
ADB1979If whatever you do uses AVX512 instructions then you will be pleasantly surprised and might want to upgrade because the increase in performance is going to be huge, but only for AVX512 workloads whilst everything else is going to be the kind of generational increase we have seen in recent years.
Modern CPUs can do crazy things like auto-vectorisation (of a series of scalar instructions). I wouldn't be surprised if some new AMD processor can convert two or four 128-bit AVX instructions into one 512-bit AVX512 instruction all by itself.
Posted on Reply
#61
ADB1979
AGlezBI'm not sure I'd notice if someone came at night and disabled all AVX512 instructions in my CPU. :confused:
It's still fairly niche, but getting more adoption in servers specifically, where of course the same Zen5 chiplets will thrive.! Not so much desktops, and Intel hurt their own technology by dropping the ball and therefore hampering adoption.
Posted on Reply
#62
AGlezB
WirkoYou're right. It looks like a casting. As pure copper is not suitable for casting, it must be an alloy. Its thermal conductivity depends on the type of alloy, but certainly isn't higher than that of pure copper.
I hadn't thought about casting so thanks for pointing it out. That said I don't know enough about casting be sure one way or another.
What I do know is that stamping difficulty is directly proportional to the complexity and inversely proportional to the size of the piece and at some point that difficulty crosses the point where milling is simpler and cheaper. Looking at the 7000 IHS, I find it easier to believe it's milled.
Posted on Reply
#63
Wirko
AGlezBI hadn't thought about casting so thanks for pointing it out. That said I don't know enough about casting be sure one way or another.
What I do know is that stamping difficulty is directly proportional to the complexity and inversely proportional to the size of the piece and at some point that difficulty crosses the point where milling is simpler and cheaper. Looking at the 7000 IHS, I find it easier to believe it's milled.
Those are not mutually exclusive. It's either stamping or casting, then some milling (which you want to minimise in mass production), then honing, smoothing and similar finishing steps. One thing I'm quite sure of: the eight funny cutouts crenels can be made to adequate precision by stamping or casting, so they're not something that would increase the manufacturing cost of the IHS.
Posted on Reply
#64
AGlezB
WirkoThose are not mutually exclusive. It's either stamping or casting, then some milling (which you want to minimise in mass production), then honing, smoothing and similar finishing steps. One thing I'm quite sure of: the eight funny cutouts crenels can be made to adequate precision by stamping or casting, so they're not something that would increase the manufacturing cost of the IHS.
I'm still curious about the manufacturing process.
Maybe ping GN's Steve to see if he can get video on the IHSs being manufactured? I don't have the pull but I bet someone here knows him and can plant the idea in his head.
Posted on Reply
#65
ADB1979
AGlezBI'm still curious about the manufacturing process.
Maybe ping GN's Steve to see if he can get video on the IHSs being manufactured? I don't have the pull but I bet someone here knows him and can plant the idea in his head.
I am pretty sure I have seen an IHS sawn in half to see the inside of it, it might have been on Der8auer's YT channel. That would give a good idea of how it's made, and that might have been discussed in the video.
Posted on Reply
#66
NoneRain
NordicHopefully the 9800x3d is not a delayed launch.
I actually would be really surprised if it is available at the launch....
Posted on Reply
#67
LucidStrike
AGlezBLet's hope they don't keep the shape of the IHS from the 7000s.
Yes, the 7000s look "cooler" :wtf: until the moment you try to clean the thermal paste :banghead:.
They explained at launch that it was to maintain compatibility with AM4 coolers.
Posted on Reply
#68
Nordic
NoneRainI actually would be really surprised if it is available at the launch....
Keyword: Hope
Posted on Reply
#69
dragontamer5788
I like how yall are talking about upgrading with computers half my computer's age...

That being said... I'm thinking of upgrading my Threadripper 1950x. The 7000-series looks good but if I waited this long to upgrade, I might as well wait a little bit longer and see what 9000-series offers?
Posted on Reply
#70
phints
I skipped 7000 series since I upgrade every 2-3 gens so looking forward to 9700X or 9800X3D depending on pricing and performance. I hope AMD fixed the longer boot times plaguing 7000 series though.
Posted on Reply
#71
dragontamer5788
phintsI skipped 7000 series since I upgrade every 2-3 gens so looking forward to 9700X or 9800X3D depending on pricing and performance. I hope AMD fixed the longer boot times plaguing 7000 series though.
Aren't the boot time issues nominally a DDR5 issue? I think tighter timings will be possible with CAMM memory modules and thus faster boots.
Posted on Reply
#72
Super Firm Tofu
dragontamer5788Aren't the boot time issues nominally a DDR5 issue? I think tighter timings will be possible with CAMM memory modules and thus faster boots.
They're specific to AMD's implementation of DDR5. Intel has no issue with post times.
Posted on Reply
#73
trsttte
SL2Don't ask me why tho.
Just throwing a guess but I believe AMD wanted to reduce upgrade friction and not have to deal with lack of compatible coolers on the market since they're still seen as the underdog. Whenever there's discussions about design support like for handhelds and the framework laptop for example, it's often brought up that AMD doesn't provide anywhere near the same level of support as Intel which could also translate to not having the resources (both reputational and engineering) to guarantee a vast amount of compatibles coolers at launch
ARFit has been proved that it worsens the cooling capabilities
Not because of the weird design though, that's just the thickness ;)
SL2It's possible that AMD wanted to avoid bendgate
I vaguelly remember reading something about the weird shape also helping avoid that :confused:
Posted on Reply
#74
ADB1979
Super Firm TofuThey're specific to AMD's implementation of DDR5. Intel has no issue with post times.
Isn't this only for memory training on the first boot or when frequency/timings are changed in the BIOS and then every boot is normal speed rather than several minutes.?
Posted on Reply
#75
Super Firm Tofu
ADB1979Isn't this only for memory training on the first boot or when frequency/timings are changed in the BIOS and then every boot is normal speed rather than several minutes.?
Unfortunately it's not. In later AGESA, AMD offers an option called Memory Context Restore that when enabled will attempt to boot/reboot with the last trained settings. It's not 100% failsafe though. It's also been a cause of BSOD's and instability for some.

In my case, with a GB X670 and 7950X3D, the only way I'm able to boot and reboot successfully every time is by turning off MCR. When enabled, it's about a 12 second BIOS time reported by Windows. Disabled, in my case with 64GB of 6000/CL30, it's an 86 second BIOS time, each and every time. This is running either straight EXPO/XMP, or manually entering in all timings.

It's not the end of the world until you need to be doing something that requires multiple reboots in a row.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 13:39 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts