Thursday, June 27th 2024

AMD to Revise Specs of Ryzen 7 9700X to Increase TDP to 120W, to Beat 7800X3D

AMD's Ryzen 9000 "Granite Ridge" family of Socket AM5 desktop processors based on the "Zen 5" microarchitecture arrive in July, with four processor models in the lead—the 9950X 16-core, the 9900X 12-core, the 9700X 8-core, and the 9600X 6-core. AMD is building the CCDs (CPU core dies) of these processors on the slightly newer 4 nm foundry node, compared to the 5 nm node that the Ryzen 7000 series "Raphael" processors based on "Zen 4" are built on; and generally lowered the TDP values of all but the top 16-core part. The company is reportedly reconsidering these changes, particularly in wake of company statements that the 9000X series may not beat the 7000X3D series in gaming performance, which may have sullied the launch, particularly for gamers.

From the company's Computex 2024 announcement of the Ryzen 9000 series, the 9950X has the same 170 W TDP as its predecessor, the 7950X. The 9900X 12-core part, however, comes with a lower 120 W TDP compared to the 170 W of the 7900X. Things get interesting with the 8-core and 6-core parts. Both the 9700X 8-core, and the 9600X 6-core chips come with 65 W TDP. The 9700X succeeds the 7700X, which came with a 105 W TDP, while the 9600X succeeds the 7600X that enjoys the same 105 W TDP. The TDP and package power tracing (PPT) values of an AMD processor are known to affect CPU boost frequency residence, particularly in some of the higher core-count SKUs. Wccftech reports that AMD is planning to revise the specifications of at least the Ryzen 7 9700X.
Apparently, the Ryzen 7 9700X will undergo a set of changes to its specifications which see the TDP and PPT values increase. The TDP will be increased to 120 W, which is higher than even the 105 W that the 7700X comes with, and matches the 120 W of the 7800X3D. Given that the 9700X lacks 3D V-cache, the increased power limits should vastly improve the boost frequency residence of this chip. At this point we don't know if the re-spec includes an increase in clock speeds.

As to how AMD plans to go about this change in specs, given that a July launch would mean that chips with 65 W TDP may already have entered the supply chain; we honestly don't know, and the source article doesn't say. If we were to speculate, such an on-the-fly specs change could be deployed through motherboard BIOS updates that see the motherboard override the TDP and PPT values of the 9700X.

The idea behind the specs change, according to Wccftech, is to improve the gaming performance of the 9700X through clock speeds (boost residence) backed by increased power limits, so it gets closer to—or even beat—the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. A 9000X3D series (Zen 5 + 3D V-cache) is very much on the cards, but we don't expect those chips to come out before Q4 2024 at least.
Source: Wccftech
Add your own comment

112 Comments on AMD to Revise Specs of Ryzen 7 9700X to Increase TDP to 120W, to Beat 7800X3D

#101
trsttte
stimpy88As I have been saying since Zen 4 - AMD needs to stop this 3D cache grab, and incorporate the extra L3 directly in to the die.
This situation has only happened because of this greed.
That would increase the size of the tiny profitable chiplets, but you're not far of target. What they need to do is stop releasing non X3D cpu's, at least X versions that are not X3D.

For OEM and budget it's valid to keep the non-X3D variants, along with the Pro line up, but X variants for gaming/enthusiast/diy market should only be X3D parts, it has become perfectly clear they have a huge advantage, makes no sense to bait consumers with the 9700X to 6 months later or sooner launch a 9700X3D that will be a fair bit better.
Posted on Reply
#102
ARF
trsttteThat would increase the size of the tiny profitable chiplets
And eventually, it will lead to increased sales and market share, because of improved gaming competitiveness against intel.
trsttteWhat they need to do is stop releasing non X3D cpu's, at least X versions that are not X3D.
For OEM and budget it's valid to keep the non-X3D variants, along with the Pro line up, but X variants for gaming/enthusiast/diy market should only be X3D parts, it has become perfectly clear they have a huge advantage, makes no sense to bait consumers with the 9700X to 6 months later or sooner launch a 9700X3D that will be a fair bit better.
They need to differentiate product tiers:
1. Performance for creators - many cores with not so much cache 16/24-core with 80-120 MB cache.
2. Gamers - a bit less cores with as much cache as physically possible 10-12-14-core with 256 MB cache.
3. Budget - less cores with even less cache 8-core with 64 MB cache.
Posted on Reply
#103
trsttte
ARFAnd eventually, it will lead to increased sales and market share, because of improved gaming competitiveness against intel.



They need to differentiate product tiers:
1. Performance for creators - many cores with not so much cache 16/24-core with 80-120 MB cache.
2. Gamers - a bit less cores with as much cache as physically possible 10-12-14-core with 256 MB cache.
3. Budget - less cores with even less cache 8-core with 64 MB cache.
I guess they're now in a more stable position and could start doing more differentiated products but that would require a strategy change from what brought the company back to life. The central piece and AMD's strenght on the CPU market segment comes from doing one small CCD that's cheap to produce and that can be reused across all segments - desktop, embedded, workstation, server and ideally laptop but they're not quite there yet. With this they can get much better margins and allows them to easily shift priorities between segments.

As long as that's enough to keep Intel at bay - and they still have a good margin to play with, as competitive as Intel is AMD is cheaper and has margin to go further down - there's no reason for them to change no matter how much we'd want them to.
Posted on Reply
#104
ARF
trstttethere's no reason for them to change no matter how much we'd want them to
I am ok with this - it will save me another bucket of money, thrown at another useless new socket. :rolleyes:
Will stay with AM4 in the next 20 years :D
Posted on Reply
#105
kapone32
A Computer Guy5950x was just an amazing chip for it's time. Sure other CPU's are faster but now you have to deal with big.little or hybrid X3D or much higher TDP 16 core desktop parts. It's been a dream working on the well roundedness of a good X570 board offering x16 (or x8/x8x or x4x4x4x4) + x4 + x1 with a 5950x CPU and a lot of USB3 I/O plus plenty of SATA, NVMe, and 128GB ECC. It's just aging incredibly well.
I still use mine and love it. Not for Gaming but that is not the only thing you can do with a PC.
Posted on Reply
#106
SL2
stimpy88Intel is going to give them a bloody nose, and they don't have a product that competes for another 6 months, and then the cost of those parts will become an issue.
What 6 months are you talking about?
Posted on Reply
#107
ARF
SL2What 6 months are you talking about?
The time gap between non-X3D and actual X3D CPUs ?

Let's hope intel brings something much faster than anything Ryzen. This will do two good things - will prove that AMD's execution is wrong, and will bring the prices down.
Ryzen 5 9600 for 89$, anyone ?
Posted on Reply
#108
SL2
ARFThe time gap between non-X3D and actual X3D CPUs ?
Do you have a source of even a rumor for that?
ARFLet's hope intel brings something much faster than anything Ryzen. This will do two good things - will prove that AMD's execution is wrong, and will bring the prices down.
Ryzen 5 9600 for 89$, anyone ?
This is just delusional.
Posted on Reply
#109
stimpy88
SL2What 6 months are you talking about?
This is the rumoured public availability of the x3D chips, I think it's closer to 4-5 months, as they have sped things up because they fear they haven't done enough to counter intel.

BTW, it was AMD themselves who stated that the x3D chips are coming towards the end of the year.
Posted on Reply
#110
SL2
stimpy88This is the rumoured public availability of the x3D chips, I think it's closer to 4-5 months, as they have sped things up because they fear they haven't done enough to counter intel.

BTW, it was AMD themselves who stated that the x3D chips are coming towards the end of the year.
I dunno, never heard anything like that, all I've seen is that 3D will come at the same time as boards the new PCH's in september.

It's all speculation anyway, I'll guess we'll know four weeks from now.



Did it for you *arf so you don't have to, cheers:
Posted on Reply
#111
Kaleid
ARFThe time gap between non-X3D and actual X3D CPUs ?

Let's hope intel brings something much faster than anything Ryzen. This will do two good things - will prove that AMD's execution is wrong, and will bring the prices down.
Ryzen 5 9600 for 89$, anyone ?
Unlikely, Intel will release toasters for a while longer
__
As for the 9000 series, my advice is to wait for non X and 3d versions to come out for better optimization
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 21st, 2024 07:59 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts