Friday, July 12th 2024

Arm Unveils "Accuracy Super Resolution" Based on AMD FSR 2

In a community blog post, Arm has announced its new Accuracy Super Resolution (ASR) upscaling technology. This open-source solution aims to transform mobile gaming by offering best-in-class upscaling capabilities for smartphones and tablets. Arm ASR addresses a critical challenge in mobile gaming: delivering high-quality graphics while managing power consumption and heat generation. By rendering games at lower resolutions and then intelligently upscaling them, Arm ASR promises to significantly boost performance without sacrificing visual quality. The technology builds upon AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution 2 (FSR 2) and adapts it specifically for mobile devices. Arm ASR utilizes temporal upscaling, which combines information from multiple frames to produce higher-quality images from lower-resolution inputs. Even though temporal upscaling is more complicated to implement than spatial frame-by-frame upscaling, it delivers better results and gives developers more freedom.

This approach allows for more ambitious graphics while maintaining smooth gameplay. In benchmark tests using a complex scene, Arm demonstrated impressive results. Devices featuring the Arm Immortalis-G720 GPU showed substantial framerate improvements when using Arm ASR compared to native resolution rendering and Qualcomm's Game Super Resolution (GSR). Moreover, the technology helped maintain stable temperatures, preventing thermal throttling that can compromise user experience. Collaboration with MediaTek revealed significant power savings when using Arm ASR on a Dimensity 9300 handset. This translates to extended battery life for mobile gamers, addressing key concerns. Arm is releasing ASR under an MIT open-source license, encouraging widespread adoption and experimentation among developers. Below you can see the comparison of various upscalers.

Here are the comparisons between quality, performance, and balanced mode.
Source: Arm
Add your own comment

36 Comments on Arm Unveils "Accuracy Super Resolution" Based on AMD FSR 2

#26
InVasMani
Yeah makes plenty of sense for mobile/portable displays in general.
Posted on Reply
#27
lemonadesoda
It’s always better to have the graphics pipeline (whatever method) doing the upscaling, than to output low resolution and have the TV do the upscaling.
Posted on Reply
#28
Minus Infinity
TheDeeGeeWhy on earth would you base anything of FSR...
Point has been made a thousand times before: it's open source.

If you have the skill you can work on the code free of charge and implement your owned improved FSR. Try that with DLSS.
john_It could be just marketing. People without any technical knowledge could think that upscaling takes a 720p resolution image and creates a REAL 1080p image. Just remembering those TV shows where they can enhance a low quality pixelated image to a high resolution incredibly detailed image. If viewers of those Tv shows can believe this, then they can surely believe that upscaling will offer them trully higher resolution, perfectly detailed image.

There could be some truth in this. Probably an upscaled image from a 720p displayed on a 1080p monitor to be somewhat better than displaying 720p resolution on the same monitor without any upscaling algorithm messing with the final image. And I am talking about FSR here, not DLSS that does have some advantages.

In the end the typical user might not know how to change a resolution or might not want to change the resolution. There are psychological reasons. Me, about 10-12? years ago I was playing Borderlands on a 32'' 1080p TV with the resolution set at 720p, 30-40fps and enjoying it(9800GT or HD4870 main + GT620 I think for the physx). Others wouldn't enjoy it. Even the thought that the resolution is lower than what the monitor can provide, could lead them to order a much faster GPU/CPU/system.
There are AI based upscalers that can produce far higher quality than native res. I use upscaling in my phtoography a lot. I photograph birds and you are always cropping hard often reducing image size 75%. I have compared output from an upscaled 12MP image to a native 24MP image using Topaz Gigapixel AI and It was virtually impossible to tell the difference. If the original source material is good quality the "AI" upscaled version will be veryn good. In more extreme upscaling tests, one photographer showed images from his 24MP camera upscaled to 61MP of his other camera and again it was hard to tell which was native.

There are no non-AI upscalers I know can do anything like that. All the proven methods like Lanczos etc look bad when upscaling x 50% or more for realistic images that aren't just simple shapes etc.

AMD is admitting defeat, AI upscaling is coming, probably in FSR 4.
Posted on Reply
#29
AusWolf
Minus InfinityPoint has been made a thousand times before: it's open source.

If you have the skill you can work on the code free of charge and implement your owned improved FSR. Try that with DLSS.


There are AI based upscalers that can produce far higher quality than native res. I use upscaling in my phtoography a lot. I photograph birds and you are always cropping hard often reducing image size 75%. I have compared output from an upscaled 12MP image to a native 24MP image using Topaz Gigapixel AI and It was virtually impossible to tell the difference. If the original source material is good quality the "AI" upscaled version will be veryn good. In more extreme upscaling tests, one photographer showed images from his 24MP camera upscaled to 61MP of his other camera and again it was hard to tell which was native.

There are no non-AI upscalers I know can do anything like that. All the proven methods like Lanczos etc look bad when upscaling x 50% or more for realistic images that aren't just simple shapes etc.

AMD is admitting defeat, AI upscaling is coming, probably in FSR 4.
It's not defeat. The only reasons FSR doesn't use AI (just yet) is 1. because AMD didn't want to restrict it to RDNA 3 and lock out all the previous generations of GPUs that don't have AI cores and 2. AMD doesn't have the experience with AI that Nvidia has. The current version of FSR is and always has been a stopgap with something better coming. The time it takes for gamers to upgrade to GPUs with AI cores gives AMD time to develop their AI upscaler. No rush there (yet).

Other than that, I agree.
Posted on Reply
#30
john_
Minus InfinityAMD is admitting defeat, AI upscaling is coming, probably in FSR 4.
They where probably doing what they did with FreeSync. Offered a solution that can be implemented everywhere with zero cost. And they won. Everyone is using their solution. Bringing AI in FSR 4 is just the next step, not a defeat. As we have FreeSync and FreeSync Premium in TVs/monitors, we will have non AI FSR and AI FSR in graphics. FSR 2.x/3.x will keep being implemented for years to come as the easiest option that can be used even will old graphics cards and FSR 4, let's hope it will be using the NPU in CPU's, not just AMD's CPU's, any CPU with an NPU. That way NPU's will make sense even to simple gamers not caring for the other uses of those NPUs. Nvidia of course will retain the advantage with DLSS and will keep finding new ways to use those tensor cores in it's GPUs, but thanks to NPUs in CPUs we might get solutions closer to those offered from Nvidia. We need that to avoid ending up in a market where Nvidia GPUs will be the only choice.
Posted on Reply
#32
Tropick
Colossal W for raspberry pi gamers
Posted on Reply
#33
tsunami2311
Yah more Upscalers.

I rather Drop my detail setting before I ever use Upscaler again gain FPS. only then I would use one if that dont work.

Such Thing would be great if say you have 1080p monitor or what ever and you CAN NOT get you FPS target, it will certainly look better, with such upscale then running say 720p on monitor it self . Atlest on still image for most part, but once it moving hit PQ obvious to me and they all suffer from that , it just some deal with it better, and all them ugly too me in that regard.

To those that dont notice or dont care kudo's
Posted on Reply
#34
Minus Infinity
AusWolfIt's not defeat. The only reasons FSR doesn't use AI (just yet) is 1. because AMD didn't want to restrict it to RDNA 3 and lock out all the previous generations of GPUs that don't have AI cores and 2. AMD doesn't have the experience with AI that Nvidia has. The current version of FSR is and always has been a stopgap with something better coming. The time it takes for gamers to upgrade to GPUs with AI cores gives AMD time to develop their AI upscaler. No rush there (yet).

Other than that, I agree.
Sure they'll use the term defeat, but call it what you like, they know they are behind. Also their hardware lacks tensor cores to handle the matrix math for AI as efficiently, I'll bet if they had an AI upscaler it would be slower anyway.

RDNA3 could have offered AI upscaler and old hardware could still use FSR2, so why gimp your newer cards?
Posted on Reply
#35
AusWolf
Minus InfinityRDNA3 could have offered AI upscaler and old hardware could still use FSR2, so why gimp your newer cards?
Probably because of the second reason: they're behind Nvidia on this tech, and it's not ready yet.
Posted on Reply
#36
Chrispy_
qlumUpscaling itself takes gpu power, on weak mobile gpu's this is relevant, games on switch using fsr 2 tend to use a sinplified version for that reason. I will say they probably took a workload that made the difference more noticable
Yeah, I just didn't realise it was that intensive.

Given that FSR 1.5X is slower than native on low-end hardware, it seems like a godawful fit.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 23rd, 2024 08:36 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts