Friday, September 13th 2024

Silicon Motion's SM2508 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Controller is as Power Efficient as Promised

The first reviews of Silicon Motion's new PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD controller, the SM2508 are starting to appear online, and the good news is that the controller is as power efficient as promised by the company. Tom's hardware has put up their review of a reference design M.2 SSD from Silicon Motion and in their testing, equipped with 1 TB of Kioxia's 162-layer BiCS6 TLC NAND. It easily bests the competition when it comes to power efficiency. In their file copy test, it draws nearly two watts less than its nearest competitor and as much as three watts less than the most power hungry drive. It's still using about one watt more than the best PCIe 4.0 drives, but it goes to show that the production nodes matters, as the SM2508 is produced on a 6 nm node, compared to 12 nm for Phison's E26.

We should point out that the peak power consumption did go over nine watts, but only one of the Phison E26 drives managed to stay below 10 watts here. The most power hungry PCIe 5.0 SSD controller in the test, the InnoGrit IG5666 peaks at nearly 14 watts for comparison. Idle power consumption of the SM2508 is also very good, still drawing more than the PCIe 4.0 drives it was tested against, but far less than any of the other PCIe 5.0 drives. What about performance you ask? The reference drive places itself ahead of all the Phison E26 drives when it comes to sequential file transfers, regardless if it's to or from the drive. Random read IOPS also places right at the top, but it's somewhat behind when it comes to random writes, without being a slow drive by any means. Overall we're looking at a very promising new SSD controller from Silicon Motion with the SM2508 and TPU has also received a sample that is currently undergoing testing, so expect a review here soon.
Source: Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

27 Comments on Silicon Motion's SM2508 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Controller is as Power Efficient as Promised

#26
Chrispy_
Finally! \o/

All Gen 5.0 SSDs so far have been stupid because they cannot be cooled without exceeding the M.2 dimensions specification.

Brute forcing the issue with a large heatsink and fan is a really terrible kludge that blocks CPU coolers, PCIe slots, and of course necessitates on of those whiny, tiny, sub-40mm fans that have pitiful throughput and even more pitiful lifespans. Boards that include a PCIe 5.0 M.2 slot so often also include integrated passive cooling that has to stripped off first just to install one of the hot-n-hungry PCIe 5.0 SSDs and if the piece you're stripping off to clearn room for your roasty-toasty PCIe 5.0 SSD's active cooling solution was also the same piece that cooled your PCIe 4.0 drive you also use - then tough luck. One of your drives must suffer and your fancy motherboard now looks like an ugly mess.
Posted on Reply
#27
TheLostSwede
News Editor
Frank_100I use PCIe 4.0 as main drives and backup drive.
My biggest time sink is cloning system for back-up.
Because of throttling, the data transfer is only slightly better then SATA.
It usually takes about 2 hours for clonezilla to create and check a back-up.
It is worth doing, but I wish the hardware was faster.
I think you're confusing random file transfers with throttling, as random reads and writes aren't that much better on NVMe drives compared to the best SATA drives.
As long as you have heatsinks on your drives, they shouldn't throttle.
Chrispy_Finally! \o/

All Gen 5.0 SSDs so far have been stupid because they cannot be cooled without exceeding the M.2 dimensions specification.

Brute forcing the issue with a large heatsink and fan is a really terrible kludge that blocks CPU coolers, PCIe slots, and of course necessitates on of those whiny, tiny, sub-40mm fans that have pitiful throughput and even more pitiful lifespans. Boards that include a PCIe 5.0 M.2 slot so often also include integrated passive cooling that has to stripped off first just to install one of the hot-n-hungry PCIe 5.0 SSDs and if the piece you're stripping off to clearn room for your roasty-toasty PCIe 5.0 SSD's active cooling solution was also the same piece that cooled your PCIe 4.0 drive you also use - then tough luck. One of your drives must suffer and your fancy motherboard now looks like an ugly mess.
That's why you always buy SSDs without heatsinks. In fact, the PCIe 5.0 slot heatsinks on the motherboards are often better than the ones that the SSD makers supply. Not the ones under the GPU though, but you don't really have a choice there.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Sep 14th, 2024 17:12 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts