Wednesday, September 25th 2024

Intel Arc "Battlemage" GPU Surfaces with 20 Xe2 Cores, 2.85 GHz Clock Speed, and 12 GB VRAM

Intel's upcoming Arc "Battlemage" G21 GPU has made an appearance in Geekbench benchmarks, offering a glimpse into the future of the company's discrete graphics offerings. This next-generation GPU, part of Intel's Xe2 graphics architecture, shows promising performance that puts it almost on par with the current Arc A770 in initial tests. The benchmark results reveal a GPU with 20 Xe2 cores, translating to 160 CUs. Notably, the chip boasts a clock speed of 2,850 MHz. Equipped with 12 GB of memory, this particular model appears to be targeting the mid-range segment of the market.

Identified by the PCI ID "8086:E20B" and listed as "Intel Xe Graphics RI," the GPU scored 97,943 points in Geekbench 6's OpenCL test. This score places it near the Arc A770 and NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4060, suggesting competitive performance in its class. The test system paired the Battlemage GPU with an Intel Core i5-13600K CPU and 32 GB of DDR5-4800 memory, providing a solid platform for evaluation. One interesting thing to note is that, while these early benchmarks show weak OpenCL performance, Intel didn't historically target this particular API, and the final performance will be higher in actual games that use DirectX 12 or Vulkan APIs, possibly worthy of competing with NVIDIA and AMD solutions.
Sources: Geekbench v6, Wccftech, via VideoCardz
Add your own comment

33 Comments on Intel Arc "Battlemage" GPU Surfaces with 20 Xe2 Cores, 2.85 GHz Clock Speed, and 12 GB VRAM

#26
Minus Infinity
usinameI expressed myself wrongly, I mean the top configuration with 32Xe cores will be at 3070-3070ti level, the 20Xe version is not worth even to be mentioned

By the way, A770 is even lower now, from the last GPU review - www.techpowerup.com/review/xfx-radeon-rx-7900-xtx-magnetic-air/31.html

3070ti is 50% ahead of A770. If Battlemage with 20Xe is on the level of A770, then the full version with 60% more cores must scale linear to beat 3070ti, but it won't and I expect it to land between 3070 and 3070ti or even lower
Original goals for G10 the top tier Battlemage were 4070 Ti RT and 4080 raster. These were downgraded and even if they are at 4070 RT and raster it'll need to be very cheap with Blackwell and RDNA4 appearing in next 3-9 months.
Posted on Reply
#27
R0H1T
RUSeriousI think that would be said for those who like Intel GPUs.
It would be so much worse for Intel, unless of course they're selling it for huge profits!

They need to get close to 4090, yeah, I know easier said than done, and maintain good margins to continue their dGPU push!
Posted on Reply
#28
Caring1
All I want is for it to be energy efficient, low cost and better than their current best, eg the A770 which is really a mid range card.
Posted on Reply
#29
RUSerious
R0H1TIt would be so much worse for Intel, unless of course they're selling it for huge profits!

They need to get close to 4090, yeah, I know easier said than done, and maintain good margins to continue their dGPU push!
That just doesn't seem to be Intel's goal at present. The are investing well in drivers right now, but less so in GPU design from what I can tell. They are aiming for low to mid-range to get volume up. If Intel had hit the original top end performance targets that @Minus Infinity posted, they would be in a good place.
Posted on Reply
#30
InVasMani
CrazybcGo Intel. I don't even remotely expect Intel to go after the high end Sadly Nvidia owns that . Bur more competition in the mid to lower end I'm all for it,, Competition not only helps to keep prices in check but also breeds innovation.
Nvidia has become a unchecked problem in high end GPU space. They don't face any real competition in that market space and the more Intel/AMD are at each other's throats in CPU/GPU space the bigger that situation spirals out of control with Nvidia benefiting in a free high end GPU monopoly landscape because their focused primarily on that market segment while other two half their focus split between CPU/GPU markets. They need real laser focused competition in high end GPU space, but we're not about to get that the way things stand currently. They've effectively got a monopoly in that part of the market because there is no competition in sight.
Posted on Reply
#31
Craptacular
64KThe following is probably the article he was referring too. The title is misleading. The article isn't saying Battlemage is cancelled. Just pointing out how irrelevant Intel's presence is in dGPU as it's fallen below 1% and the chart rounds it down to 0%. btw Google is your friend.

www.pcworld.com/article/2467902/report-intel-has-been-eliminated-from-pc-graphics-cards.html
That is actually why I asked uftfafor the link because all I was finding was that article which doesn't say anything about Battlemage being cancelled.
Posted on Reply
#32
lexluthermiester
Craptaculardoesn't say anything about Battlemage being cancelled.
That's because it hasn't.
Posted on Reply
#33
64K
CraptacularThat is actually why I asked uftfafor the link because all I was finding was that article which doesn't say anything about Battlemage being cancelled.
He misunderstood it because of the chart probably. The 0% didn't mean anything had been cancelled. The chart just rounded Intel market share down to 0% because it had fallen below 1%. There should have been a note within the chart perhaps because a lot of people don't read the actual articles these days they just look at pictures, charts and videos and the title was misleading so that's on the PCWorld editors.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 01:40 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts