Tuesday, November 19th 2024

Microsoft is Introducing a $349 Mini PC That Streams Windows 11 from the Cloud

Microsoft is introducing Windows 365 Link, a compact cloud PC for business users. The device costs $349 and measures just 120 x 120 x 30 mm, making it smaller than Apple's Mac mini. The compact size comes from the fanless cooling design and the fact that the device doesn't have local storage capabilities. This small computer has quite a variety of connectivity options, including one USB-C, three USB-A ports, HDMI, DisplayPort, and Ethernet connections, supports two 4K monitors, and has Bluetooth 5.3 and Wi-Fi 6E wireless capabilities. The specific hardware details are not yet revealed by Microsoft.

It requires Windows 365 with Microsoft Intune and Entra ID, and it works with 365 Frontline, Enterprise, and Business editions. As with other cloud-based solutions, Microsoft will lock some of the security options, "features like Secure Boot, the dedicated Trusted Platform Module, Hypervisor Code Integrity, BitLocker encryption, and the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint detection and response sensor can't be turned off, further helping to secure the device". Microsoft plans to launch the device in April 2025, with early previews in the US, Canada, UK, Germany, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. Businesses interested in testing the device can contact their Microsoft account team before December 15, 2024, to join the preview program.
With Windows 365 Link, Microsoft is getting one step closer to its intention to make Windows available anytime, anywhere from the Cloud as a subscription service, similar to what Adobe did years ago.

Source: Microsoft
Add your own comment

106 Comments on Microsoft is Introducing a $349 Mini PC That Streams Windows 11 from the Cloud

#101
igormp
lexluthermiesterWhether or not it works at all or can work well depends greatly on the use-case-scenario.
No one is saying it'll work for all cases. VDI solutions do work, that's a fact.
But it is not meant for everyone, nor is it the "default" go to for most places.
lexluthermiesterOh yes, another "study" that is not double blind and not peer reviewed. :rolleyes: What shocker..
There's quite a difference between a "case study", a "research paper" (what you seem to be implying), and even "whitepapers".
lexluthermiesterMost business' need the internet, sure, but any competent and GOOD IT admin will have a contingency plan for times when downtime happen.
And yet I doubt good IT admins exist in most places. In the same vein of your idea, a good IT admin would be able to deploy a VDI solution properly.
Posted on Reply
#102
lexluthermiester
igormpNo one is saying it'll work for all cases.
Not even most.
igormpVDI solutions do work, that's a fact.
In limit situations, sure. That doesn't mean it not a PITA to administrate. I've done this one, it's not something I will EVEN do again. Nor will I advocate it.
igormpThere's quite a difference between a "case study", a "research paper" (what you seem to be implying), and even "whitepapers".
Not where it comes to wide-spread credibility. The requirements and conditions are identical.
igormpAnd yet I doubt good IT admins exist in most places. In the same vein of your idea, a good IT admin would be able to deploy a VDI solution properly.
Both of those statements imply assumptions that are wildly vapid.
Posted on Reply
#103
igormp
lexluthermiesterNot even most.
And I do agree with that. However the number where it works is not insignificant by any means.
lexluthermiesterNot where it comes to wide-spread credibility. The requirements and conditions are identical.
All those that I mentioned are different things entirely, meant to convey different information. A case study of a well known technology being applied somewhere has no scientific value whatsoever, and would not be approved by any venue.
lexluthermiesterBoth of those statements imply assumptions that are wildly vapid.
I used the exact same argument, using the exact same assumption that you did :)
Posted on Reply
#104
Visible Noise
igormpAnd I do agree with that. However the number where it works is not insignificant by any means.

All those that I mentioned are different things entirely, meant to convey different information. A case study of a well known technology being applied somewhere has no scientific value whatsoever, and would not be approved by any venue.

I used the exact same argument, using the exact same assumption that you did :)
Give it up man, you’ll just get frustrated trying to fix stupid.
Posted on Reply
#105
Chaitanya
Funny take on this overpriced M$ paper weight:
Posted on Reply
#106
lexluthermiester
igormpAnd I do agree with that. However the number where it works is not insignificant by any means.
Ok, that's fair and I would agree. There are uses for this kind of thing.
igormpAll those that I mentioned are different things entirely, meant to convey different information. A case study of a well known technology being applied somewhere has no scientific value whatsoever, and would not be approved by any venue.
Context is important then? Totally agree.

The problem with this kind of tech deployment is it's very limited usefulness. The product being promoted by microsoft in the above article is an attempt to popularize something that does not and can not work well for a wider audience.
Visible NoiseGive it up man, you’ll just get frustrated trying to fix stupid.
Irony. Look in mirror when you say such things because that's the only resolution.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 11th, 2024 22:47 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts