Monday, December 2nd 2024

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger Retires, Company Appoints two Interim co-CEOs

Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC) today announced that CEO Pat Gelsinger retired from the company after a distinguished 40-plus-year career and has stepped down from the board of directors, effective Dec. 1, 2024. Intel has named two senior leaders, David Zinsner and Michelle (MJ) Johnston Holthaus, as interim co-chief executive officers while the board of directors conducts a search for a new CEO. Zinsner is executive vice president and chief financial officer, and Holthaus has been appointed to the newly created position of CEO of Intel Products, a group that encompasses the company's Client Computing Group (CCG), Data Center and AI Group (DCAI) and Network and Edge Group (NEX). Frank Yeary, independent chair of the board of Intel, will become interim executive chair during the period of transition. Intel Foundry leadership structure remains unchanged.

The board has formed a search committee and will work diligently and expeditiously to find a permanent successor to Gelsinger. Yeary said, "On behalf of the board, I want to thank Pat for his many years of service and dedication to Intel across a long career in technology leadership. Pat spent his formative years at Intel, then returned at a critical time for the company in 2021. As a leader, Pat helped launch and revitalize process manufacturing by investing in state-of-the-art semiconductor manufacturing, while working tirelessly to drive innovation throughout the company."
Yeary continued, "While we have made significant progress in regaining manufacturing competitiveness and building the capabilities to be a world-class foundry, we know that we have much more work to do at the company and are committed to restoring investor confidence. As a board, we know first and foremost that we must put our product group at the center of all we do. Our customers demand this from us, and we will deliver for them. With MJ's permanent elevation to CEO of Intel Products along with her interim co-CEO role of Intel, we are ensuring the product group will have the resources needed to deliver for our customers. Ultimately, returning to process leadership is central to product leadership, and we will remain focused on that mission while driving greater efficiency and improved profitability."

Yeary concluded, "With Dave and MJ's leadership, we will continue to act with urgency on our priorities: simplifying and strengthening our product portfolio and advancing our manufacturing and foundry capabilities while optimizing our operating expenses and capital. We are working to create a leaner, simpler, more agile Intel."

Gelsinger said, "Leading Intel has been the honor of my lifetime - this group of people is among the best and the brightest in the business, and I'm honored to call each and every one a colleague. Today is, of course, bittersweet as this company has been my life for the bulk of my working career. I can look back with pride at all that we have accomplished together. It has been a challenging year for all of us as we have made tough but necessary decisions to position Intel for the current market dynamics. I am forever grateful for the many colleagues around the world who I have worked with as part of the Intel family."

Throughout Gelsinger's tenure at Intel across a variety of roles, he has driven significant innovation and advanced not only the business but the broader global technology industry. A highly respected leader and skilled technologist, he has played an instrumental role in focusing on innovation while also creating a sense of urgency throughout the organization. Gelsinger began his career in 1979 at Intel, growing at the company to eventually become its first chief technology officer.
Zinsner and Holthaus said, "We are grateful for Pat's commitment to Intel over these many years as well as his leadership. We will redouble our commitment to Intel Products and meeting customer needs. With our product and process leadership progressing, we will be focused on driving returns on foundry investments."

Zinsner has more than 25 years of financial and operational experience in semiconductors, manufacturing and the technology industry. He joined Intel in January 2022 from Micron Technology Inc., where he was executive vice president and CFO. Zinsner served in a variety of other leadership roles earlier in his career, including president and chief operating officer at Affirmed Networks and senior vice president of finance and CFO at Analog Devices.

Holthaus is a proven general manager and leader who began her career with Intel nearly three decades ago. Prior to being named CEO of Intel Products, she was executive vice president and general manager of CCG. Holthaus has held a variety of management and leadership roles at Intel, including chief revenue officer and general manager of the Sales and Marketing Group, and lead of global CCG sales.
Add your own comment

169 Comments on Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger Retires, Company Appoints two Interim co-CEOs

#101
lexluthermiester
ThomasKYour entire comment was, what I think, is the most "fanboying nonsense" here.
Why because I'm being objective, sensible and respectful to someone retiring and NOT jumping on the Intel shaming, shitposting bandwagon? Hmm? :rolleyes: Additionally, if you had been around long enough to be paying attention, you would know that I go to bat the same way for AMD and the nitwits badmouthing Lisa Su. You'd know that I take little to nothing on tick and I don't suffer fools.

Your comment is as ironic as it is without merit.
igormpwww.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-12-02/intel-ceo-pat-gelsinger-retires-amid-chipmaker-s-turnaround-plan?embedded-checkout=true
Oh, a Bloomberg rumor article eh? You don't say. When it's announced from Intel themselves, and it would legally have to be under those kinds of conditions, we can accept that as meritful. Not until then.
Posted on Reply
#102
Redwoodz
RandallFlaggYes well, if this is what everyone really believes is important, they should absolutely love Arrow Lake now shouldn't they? I mean the 285K is nearly a dead ringer for a 9950X in terms of both performance and power usage. It's never even 5% off on either of them, merely trades a few blows.

Right?

Oh but yeah, Arrow Lake sucks because - it wasn't faster than Raptor Lake.

I forgot..

I sometimes wonder if some Intel engineers read forums like this one, and were stupid enough to think that people really want power efficiency and hence gave them 'what they wanted'.

If they had given 20% more performance instead, Arrow Lake would be the bees knees.

But I digress, more charts :



Man your comments show a complete disregard for reality. Everyone who uses a high performance cpu knows how important power draw is. You can ignore the power costs all you want but you will never be able to get around the limitations in terms of cooling and thus core speeds. That's why it matters. You have to have a full blown custom loop to keep a 14900KS boosting anywhere near it's limits meanwhile the competition uses standard boxed AIO and coolers.
Posted on Reply
#103
RandallFlagg
RedwoodzMan your comments show a complete disregard for reality. Everyone who uses a high performance cpu knows how important power draw is. You can ignore the power costs all you want but you will never be able to get around the limitations in terms of cooling and thus core speeds. That's why it matters. You have to have a full blown custom loop to keep a 14900KS boosting anywhere near it's limits meanwhile the competition uses standard boxed AIO and coolers.
That ain't what the charts say sparky, but you just keep being you.
Posted on Reply
#104
lexluthermiester
RedwoodzMan your comments show a complete disregard for reality.
No, they used KNOWN factual info, benchmarks and whatnot. They're displaying ACTUAL reality. The rest of your comment is completely situational..
Posted on Reply
#105
AusWolf
lexluthermiesterWhy because I'm being objective, sensible and respectful to someone retiring and NOT jumping on the Intel shaming, shitposting bandwagon? Hmm? :rolleyes: Additionally, if you had been around long enough to be paying attention, you would know that I go to bat the same way for AMD and the nitwits badmouthing Lisa Su. You'd know that I take little to nothing on tick and I don't suffer fools.

Your comment is as ironic as it is without merit.


Oh, a Bloomberg article eh? You don't say. When it's announced from Intel themselves, and it would legally have to be under those kinds of conditions, we can accept that as meritful. Not until then.
The fun part is that even if Pat G got retired by force, Intel will never admit it, and we'll never know. All we'll ever have is speculation with the freedom to believe whatever we want to. And as always in such situations, I prefer not to give credit to either side.
Posted on Reply
#106
Dr_b_
This guy made all the wrong bets and spent huge sums of $ the company didn't have the revenue or government subsidies to support, made a lot of inane statements about his competitors and technology, prophesied so many things that turned out to be false about future products and nodes, released under his watch defective and uncompetitive products, and ran a 56 year old company into the ground. For all of that, during his brief 4 years as CEO, was paid hundreds of millions.
Posted on Reply
#107
lexluthermiester
AusWolfThe fun part is that even if Pat G got retired by force, Intel will never admit it, and we'll never know.
While that is a fair point, if it happened the way that is being portrayed in that Bloomberg article, they would be compelled to make a public statement about it as a matter of law. They have not, so whatever internal squabbling took place is not public information and is not credible.
Posted on Reply
#108
GodisanAtheist
Never in a million years would 2014 me have thought that Intel had this kind of a tailspin in them.
Posted on Reply
#109
kapone32
RandallFlaggDo you not know how to read a chart?

The 9800X3D is the absolute fastest you can get, and it is a whopping 4.1% faster than a 14900K in games at 1440P with a $3000 4090.

Meanwhile the 14900K obliterates it by almost 20% in apps:




At Ultra
Posted on Reply
#110
igormp
lexluthermiesterWhile that is a fair point, if it happened the way that is being portrayed in that Bloomberg article, they would be compelled to make a public statement about it as a matter of law. They have not, so whatever internal squabbling took place is not public information and is not credible.
Why would this be a matter of law?
I can see that being the case if he was indeed fired, but not if he was pressured to retire, which allows them to just tell investors that he stepped down willingly and leave it at that.
Posted on Reply
#111
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
This is a sign, Pat is abandoning a sinking ship after the 13th and 14th gen deterioration, the lukewarm reception of arc, the amt of time they were stagnant on 10nm, oh how the mighty have fallen!

Intel is reaping what they have sown since the mid 90-2022.

And this happened after they got money from "chips"
DavenPortents of what's to come...buyout, spin off fabs and/or other departments, leave the chip design business, etc. At age 63 and rich, he could have retired sooner but I'm sure he wanted to right the Intel ship before riding off into the sunset on a high note. He failed and probably knows something really bad is coming. Pat's got a legacy to protect so he's out before the coming storm.
Posted on Reply
#112
lexluthermiester
igormpWhy would this be a matter of law?
Google is your friend. Look up "Vote of no-confidence". Enjoy.
Posted on Reply
#113
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
lexluthermiesterGoogle is your friend. Look up "Vote of no-confidence". Enjoy.
I had to make that judgement over a person who got their A&P out of a crackerjack box, she had no mechanical aptitude or inclination. I had no confidence in her doing the work specified in the job description, she was already complaining about having to remove coatings using a media blaster, couldn't swing a hammer or use a screw driver or a wrench, or use securing wire to save her life, she also broke a part that costs as much as a used car at $6000 sales price. She must of gotten the a&p like a participation trophy, this was 2 months in.

Glad she resigned because It almost came to point to talk to the COO about a non recommendation of her staying employed at our company, plus the COO caught her ham hawing on her 2 weeks notice of leave, she left only after 1 week.
Posted on Reply
#114
lexluthermiester
eidairaman1I had to make that judgement over a person who got their A&P out of a crackerjack box, she had no mechanical aptitude or inclination. I had no confidence in her doing the work specified in the job description, she was already complaining about having to remove coatings using a media blaster, couldn't swing a hammer or use a screw driver to save her life, must of gotten the a&p like a participation trophy, this was 2 months in.
That's a different kind of job. You didn't fire someone who was an executive officer of a corporate entity. The rules are different and complicated in that context of accountability.
Posted on Reply
#115
umeng2002
GodisanAtheistNever in a million years would 2014 me have thought that Intel had this kind of a tailspin in them.
I saw it coming. Steve Jobs had a good speech about marketers taking over companies from the talent that put them on the top.
Posted on Reply
#116
R0H1T
Ironically Apple's doing the same for at least a decade now! Who pays $100-200 for 8GB RAM, except Apple cultists of course :shadedshu:

Eventually Apple will fall in the same trap of Intel, even if its' a decade from now, with the inflexion point likely being China. Apple has massive sales from China & their bread & butter (phones) are in a serious threat over there!
Posted on Reply
#117
Lost_Wanderer
I wasn't expecting a Joshua Graham rendition today, but okay. I also didn't expect Intel to be in (arguably/subjectively) that bad of shape.
Posted on Reply
#118
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
lexluthermiesterThat's a different kind of job. You didn't fire someone who was an executive officer of a corporate entity. The rules are different and complicated in that context of accountability.
Point is it was coming to a point of a vote no confidence if she hadn't resigned before my Supervisor and I approached the COO.
Posted on Reply
#119
lexluthermiester
eidairaman1Point is it was coming to a point of a vote no confidence if she hadn't resigned before my Supervisor and I approached the COO.
Yes, but what I'm saying is that the employee you're referring to is not an officer of the company, let alone the executive officer. You can't just "fire" a CEO or another officer of a company without serious cause and procedures, many of which are required to be declared to the public as Intel is a publicly traded company.

For Pat Gelsinger, Intel's CEO and Director of the Board, to be forced out, Intel would be required to disclose such to the public. They have not, as of yet.
Posted on Reply
#120
Ferrum Master
Good riddance.

As a engineer he made fun of AMD using glued CPUs, while his nodes bled yields, and he could have asked the guy who codesigned the glued CPU's who he employed at the time. Instead he made himself into an internet meme.

At his helm he lost the company value around 60%, what else to add? I am glad I sold my Intel stock this summer.

Lost to Nvidia in AI, Apple in mobile space, TSCM in foundries.

His biggest problem may be that he actually was an ex Intel and thus has unvented connection and perception of things... living the past glory His first move should have been massive lay offs, to regain traction, but it went otherwise, unneeded acquisitions, many ex employees including Jim Keller admitted in interviews about the toxic internal friction in between groups.
Posted on Reply
#121
nguyen
Oh well Pat was the reason TSMC charge higher prices, so he has to go after all.

Funny that running your mouth has consequences after all :roll:
Posted on Reply
#123
Broken Processor
kapone32So I have a 7900X3D and City Skylines 2. I get 60+ FPS at 4K when my city is over 800,000. Are you suggesting that the 5800x3D is faster than my 7900X3D?
No but a 9800x3d would what's your point? You also forget I said 12 core as well or did that wash over you because it didn't fit your scenario?
Posted on Reply
#124
Scrizz
Dr_b_For all of that, during his brief 4 years as CEO,
He almost made it to 4 years. Honestly, I'm a bit disappointed not enough time was given for the complete restructuring.
I guess we'll find out in a few years time if the changes worked. Maybe this is also a condition for the CHIPS act stuff :confused:
Posted on Reply
#125
LittleBro
Oh Gelsy, Gelsy ... Your bold statements shall never be forgotten.

"I can already see AMD in the rear mirror." Well, objects in the mirror might be closer and bigger than they appear. You may even be reversing while looking at that mirror.
"I bet the whole company on Intel 18A process." Why retiring now before seeing how your bet of the life turns out? Afraid, are we? Surely it's better to retire than to get fired.
"With 18A Intel will achieve world process leadership and bring Intel back to top." One shall see in 2025!

This is not a coincidence:

Intel CEO Gelsinger forced out after board lost confidence in turnaround plan
www.reuters.com/business/intel-ceo-pat-gelsinger-retire-2024-12-02/
Gelsinger, who resigned on Dec. 1, left after a board meeting last week during which directors felt Gelsinger's costly and ambitious plan to turn Intel around was not working and the progress of change was not fast enough, according to a person familiar with the matter. The board told Gelsinger he could retire or be removed, and he chose to step down, according to the source.
Of course he's technician in heart and thus he'd like to see final product of his efforts. Reuter's article totally makes sense. I mean who stops in the middle or near the end of the proccess?

Now, with this woman (has most of experience in sales and marketing) in charge, best of luck Intel ... MBA rulezzzzzz.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 4th, 2024 04:18 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts