Monday, December 2nd 2024

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger Retires, Company Appoints two Interim co-CEOs

Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC) today announced that CEO Pat Gelsinger retired from the company after a distinguished 40-plus-year career and has stepped down from the board of directors, effective Dec. 1, 2024. Intel has named two senior leaders, David Zinsner and Michelle (MJ) Johnston Holthaus, as interim co-chief executive officers while the board of directors conducts a search for a new CEO. Zinsner is executive vice president and chief financial officer, and Holthaus has been appointed to the newly created position of CEO of Intel Products, a group that encompasses the company's Client Computing Group (CCG), Data Center and AI Group (DCAI) and Network and Edge Group (NEX). Frank Yeary, independent chair of the board of Intel, will become interim executive chair during the period of transition. Intel Foundry leadership structure remains unchanged.

The board has formed a search committee and will work diligently and expeditiously to find a permanent successor to Gelsinger. Yeary said, "On behalf of the board, I want to thank Pat for his many years of service and dedication to Intel across a long career in technology leadership. Pat spent his formative years at Intel, then returned at a critical time for the company in 2021. As a leader, Pat helped launch and revitalize process manufacturing by investing in state-of-the-art semiconductor manufacturing, while working tirelessly to drive innovation throughout the company."
Yeary continued, "While we have made significant progress in regaining manufacturing competitiveness and building the capabilities to be a world-class foundry, we know that we have much more work to do at the company and are committed to restoring investor confidence. As a board, we know first and foremost that we must put our product group at the center of all we do. Our customers demand this from us, and we will deliver for them. With MJ's permanent elevation to CEO of Intel Products along with her interim co-CEO role of Intel, we are ensuring the product group will have the resources needed to deliver for our customers. Ultimately, returning to process leadership is central to product leadership, and we will remain focused on that mission while driving greater efficiency and improved profitability."

Yeary concluded, "With Dave and MJ's leadership, we will continue to act with urgency on our priorities: simplifying and strengthening our product portfolio and advancing our manufacturing and foundry capabilities while optimizing our operating expenses and capital. We are working to create a leaner, simpler, more agile Intel."

Gelsinger said, "Leading Intel has been the honor of my lifetime - this group of people is among the best and the brightest in the business, and I'm honored to call each and every one a colleague. Today is, of course, bittersweet as this company has been my life for the bulk of my working career. I can look back with pride at all that we have accomplished together. It has been a challenging year for all of us as we have made tough but necessary decisions to position Intel for the current market dynamics. I am forever grateful for the many colleagues around the world who I have worked with as part of the Intel family."

Throughout Gelsinger's tenure at Intel across a variety of roles, he has driven significant innovation and advanced not only the business but the broader global technology industry. A highly respected leader and skilled technologist, he has played an instrumental role in focusing on innovation while also creating a sense of urgency throughout the organization. Gelsinger began his career in 1979 at Intel, growing at the company to eventually become its first chief technology officer.
Zinsner and Holthaus said, "We are grateful for Pat's commitment to Intel over these many years as well as his leadership. We will redouble our commitment to Intel Products and meeting customer needs. With our product and process leadership progressing, we will be focused on driving returns on foundry investments."

Zinsner has more than 25 years of financial and operational experience in semiconductors, manufacturing and the technology industry. He joined Intel in January 2022 from Micron Technology Inc., where he was executive vice president and CFO. Zinsner served in a variety of other leadership roles earlier in his career, including president and chief operating officer at Affirmed Networks and senior vice president of finance and CFO at Analog Devices.

Holthaus is a proven general manager and leader who began her career with Intel nearly three decades ago. Prior to being named CEO of Intel Products, she was executive vice president and general manager of CCG. Holthaus has held a variety of management and leadership roles at Intel, including chief revenue officer and general manager of the Sales and Marketing Group, and lead of global CCG sales.
Add your own comment

217 Comments on Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger Retires, Company Appoints two Interim co-CEOs

#27
RUSerious
lexluthermiesterNo it isn't. What's with the drama?
The culture, at least in the CPU development groups. The lack of cooperation is almost tragic. The Fiefdoms within the groups, centered around higher ranked managers, is a loyalty based system which prioritizes group success over SoC design success. Keller ran into this and it was so bad that it affected his health. A lot of this is out there publicly on the web, some comes from a former Intel engineer I used to chat with. It’s bad.

Intel is in need of a massive restructuring including more subsidiary sell offs and large layoffs to break and rebuild the corporate identity and focus (ala AMD). I don’t see any other way.

Moving the deck chairs around on the titanic just isn’t going to cut it. IMHO.
Posted on Reply
#28
dragontamer5788
lexluthermiesterUnlike the fanboying nonsense being displayed in some of the comments above, I think Pat did a lot of good while he was at the helm. We have the ARC GPU's, both card and IGP versions, we had the BIG/little thing which turned out decently and few other things he helped with or started. My only real complaint is that he didn't revisit the HEDT market sector, but with the challenges of the pandemic...

Pat was a positive person and he left a good mark on Intel and the world.

Enjoy retirement Mr Gelsinger! :toast:
Those P-cores vs E-cores things may be confusing, but today's Ultra 7 265k processors are basically Threadripper of old (with the E-cores) + some high-performance modern cores for video games. They're actually productivity beasts.

I think the real "behind the scenes" has to do with the future of Intel and not so much its present or past. The big theory floating around that 18A is a messed up process just makes a lot of sense. Intel's poured tens of $billions into 20A and 18A, and 20A is already a failure. Intel cannot tolerate further disruptions to its manufacturing plans.
Posted on Reply
#29
kondamin
Well now I lost what little faith I had in the company.

I hope some manufacturers start making powerful consumer market Risc V soc's As arm and x86 is going to cost stupid much on the high end and stagnate like the gpu market on the lower to midrange.
Posted on Reply
#30
Chomiq
phanbueyThe game of thrones over there.
So... lots of incest?

Now I know what Pat meant when he said "Papa's home"...
Posted on Reply
#31
lexluthermiester
ChomiqSo... lots of incest?

Now I know what Pat meant when he said "Papa's home"...
Oh good grief was that just wrong. Funny, sure, but wrong..
Posted on Reply
#32
piloponth
Whoever next saves Intel and brings a competitive product, should be awarded the Nobel and Oscar at the same time.
Posted on Reply
#33
Bobaganoosh
I don't know that this is a sign of further bad news (i.e. 18A failures), but could just be their best hope of turning stonks around. The changes behind the scenes take a long time and if they don't do something to convince the market that they're making real changes, they won't have time to see if those behind the scenes efforts are fruitful. Sometimes, you just change the CEO and stonks go up. So this could be as simple as they don't know what else to do publicly in the short-term to boost confidence. If they can find a new person who comes across as intelligent, driven, and bringing new ideas it may be all they need to get their stonks going up again. Sadly, their stock price is more important than their products to a company that big, so this is not an uncommon strategy.

All that said, yes this could be a sign of further bad news lol. I'm just saying we don't know yet.
Posted on Reply
#34
HD64G
The boarding counsil showed they mind the shareholders' best interests by shoving Pat out. They bought some time but that has nothing to do with the real problems Intel is facing. The CPU sector is doing really bad and the GPU one never took off and never will do so. The OEM agreements saved them for years now but cannot sustain both their R&D and marketing expenses needed for long.
Posted on Reply
#35
Prima.Vera
phanbueyNvidia is coming into the CPU space, so I have a feeling gamers will be milked by a new yet familiar force.
Unless they buy an x86 license holder company, no way they can compete in Desktop space, relax.
Posted on Reply
#36
Dr. Dro
lexluthermiesterUnlike the fanboying nonsense being displayed in some of the comments above, I think Pat did a lot of good while he was at the helm. We have the ARC GPU's, both card and IGP versions, we had the BIG/little thing which turned out decently and few other things he helped with or started. My only real complaint is that he didn't revisit the HEDT market sector, but with the challenges of the pandemic...

Pat was a positive person and he left a good mark on Intel and the world.

Enjoy retirement Mr Gelsinger! :toast:
It's not TPU if no one is rushing to the defense of AMD while simultaneously blasting Intel and Nvidia for simply existing haha

I too have a relatively positive view of Pat. He got Intel through some very troubled times, I'd say Intel hasn't been stable ever since Brian Krzanich had to resign for doing an Intel Inside his secretary :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#37
BoggledBeagle
I do not believe that mr. Gelsinger had enough time to influence the building blocks from which to make products, but he already could have influenced what to put together from these blocks.

While Intel in the past boasted about having the best gaming CPUs, Gelsinger did not seem to care about this segment at all. Of course, they make a lot of other products than gaming CPUs, and in the grand scheme of things this market may not be that important for the company, but the total lack of interest is noticeable and it probably had no positive effect on anything.

BTW I think that delivering a bit underwhelming Arrow lake - a first product which is radically different than all previous monolithic CPUs is quite excusable, but Intel probably really needed to deliver some decisively good and compelling product.
Posted on Reply
#38
R0H1T
Dr. DroI too have a relatively positive view of Pat. He got Intel through some very troubled times, I'd say Intel hasn't been stable ever since Brian Krzanich had to resign for doing an Intel Inside his secretary :laugh:
BK likely isn't even in the top 3 dud CEOs for them; right at the top it probably should be Paul Otellini, then Craig Barrett & maybe Bob Swan tied(?) with Krzanich.
Posted on Reply
#39
ZoneDymo
hmm didnt see that coming, weird too, it seems they had a vision with some pains and struggles in the immediate future to then eventually have a solid base...but he dips.
Posted on Reply
#40
R0H1T
Could've had something to do with the CHIPS grants! The equivalent of those slap on the wrists post 2008 bailouts, for every company/bank that was helped by the govt back then.
Posted on Reply
#41
Wirko
BoggledBeagleBTW I think that delivering a bit underwhelming Arrow lake - a first product which is radically different than all previous monolithic CPUs is quite excusable,
Maybe but manufacturing wise it's hardly an Intel product, and that's inexcusable.
Posted on Reply
#42
Chomiq
On a serious note, I wonder what his retirement package will be in comparison to all the people that were laid off this year at Intel worldwide.
Posted on Reply
#43
Wirko
lexluthermiesterOh good grief was that just wrong. Funny, sure, but wrong..
Staying in bed with Dell, HP, Lenovo and probably a couple others is not technically an incest, although at least metaphorically it is.
Posted on Reply
#44
RandallFlagg
R0H1TBK likely isn't even in the top 3 dud CEOs for them; right at the top it probably should be Paul Otellini, then Craig Barrett & maybe Bob Swan tied(?) with Krzanich.
They all played it safe until the advantage they started with was pissed away.

The problem Gelsinger had is that it takes 5 years from start to silicon to make a new CPU. So whatever they were designing when he took the reigns, won't see the light of day until 2026-2027.

That said, Raptor Lake (enhanced Alder Lake, both versions) as well as Rocket Lake (Ice Lake 14nm) were created at Pat's behest. They weren't new but stopgaps to buy more time for their nodes to catch up. Intel's original roadmap should have had them on Alder Lake in 2019, not 2022.

IMO Lunar Lake is the first real sign that Intel was back on the path to dominance. Granite Rapids and Sierra Forest also signal that they caught up with AMD. Probably too little too late though, Arrow Lake is a flop and they are using too much TSMC to fab on their new chips. It's a very mixed bag.
Posted on Reply
#45
BoggledBeagle
WirkoMaybe but manufacturing wise it's hardly an Intel product, and that's inexcusable.
The weird fat Irish lady responsible for manufacturing development should probably leave too. Sorry to be this blunt.
Posted on Reply
#46
Wirko
kondaminWell now I lost what little faith I had in the company.
I still tend to be cautiously optimistic. Stock price is up. We can ridicule naive and stupid shareholders and market analysts all we want, they have information most people don't have.
Posted on Reply
#47
trparky
Pat didn't retire; he got retired.

Pat was given an ultimatum: either retire (with a semblance of honor) or be handed a box, told to clean out his desk, and unceremoniously shown the door. Pat chose the first option.
Posted on Reply
#48
stahlhart
RootinTootinPootinfanboi's are now gamers? so doing 5% innovation over the previous gen and marking/jacking up X3D chips price is caring much? and making them as paying beta testers as well?
Check the battery in your sarcasm meter. :)
Posted on Reply
#49
Wirko
RandallFlaggThat said, Raptor Lake (enhanced Alder Lake, both versions) as well as Rocket Lake (Ice Lake 14nm) were created at Pat's behest. They weren't new but stopgaps to buy more time for their nodes to catch up.
In the tick-tock-optimisation cycle, Raptor Lake was what? More cache, more E cores, improved ring bus speed, maybe a few other very minor optimisations. It could have been more. Millions of man-hours of capable engineers passed by between Alder and Raptor launches.
Posted on Reply
#50
Broken Processor
I wasn't a fan of his because he didn't fix the interdepartmental infighting that caused some very talented people to leave and scuppered beast core but let's be real he was CEO for less than four years so probably had very little involvement into realised product's released in his time at the top but I'm guessing his scalp was needed to try and stop the market souring even more and hopefully bolster confidence in Intel with the added benefit of all little core design goes with him hopefully.

I doubt him leaving will bolster gaming or enthusiast segment because they could make 8 and 12 large core monolithic chips and be at the top of those segments but they won't because we are a niche market. And it's very telling when neither AMD or Intel have released monolithic versions for gaming in the interim as it's well known the latency caused with chiplets doesn't play nice with games and we could have still been using monolithic for that purpose.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 11th, 2024 17:13 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts