Thursday, January 2nd 2025
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU Sales Surpass Entire Ryzen 9000 Series at German Retailer
Recent sales data (nicely complied by VideoCardz) from one of the largest German retailers, Mindfactory, has revealed that the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor has achieved higher unit sales than all Ryzen 9000 processors combined. Despite its later market entry, the eight-core 9800X3D CPU has reached 8,650 units sold, surpassing the combined sales of the earlier-released standard Ryzen 9000 processors. For comparison, the entire non-X3D Ryzen 9000 lineup, including the Ryzen 9 9950X, 9900X, Ryzen 7 9700X, and Ryzen 5 9600X, has accumulated fewer total sales through the same retailer. The flagship Ryzen 9 9950X alone accounts for just 780 units, while the Ryzen 9 9900X and Ryzen 5 9600X have moved 810 and 890 units, respectively, while the second-best selling 9000 series SKU was Ryzen 7 9700X with 2,510 units sold. However, the 9800X3D's market performance still falls significantly short of its predecessor. The previous generation Ryzen 7 7800X3D maintains a massive lead with 78,420 units sold through the same retailer.
AMD is preparing to expand its X3D lineup with several new models. The six-core Ryzen 5 9600X3D is scheduled for release, along with 12-core Ryzen 9 9900X3D and 16-core Ryzen 9 9950X3D variants expected later this month. Based on previous generation sales patterns, where higher-core models saw lower adoption rates, these upcoming high-end processors may face similar market dynamics. Of course, these sales figures are only a part of the story as Mindfactory is only a single retailer across a diverse set of sellers, so the complete market picture is unknown to anyone but AMD. PC upgrade cycles are a common bottleneck in new CPU sales, especially as consumers don't tend to upgrade their PCs every year with new CPUs and platforms. We have to wait and see how the market adapts to new X3D SKUs, and if the Zen 5 X3D CPUs can reach the previous generation fame among consumers.
Source:
VideoCardz
AMD is preparing to expand its X3D lineup with several new models. The six-core Ryzen 5 9600X3D is scheduled for release, along with 12-core Ryzen 9 9900X3D and 16-core Ryzen 9 9950X3D variants expected later this month. Based on previous generation sales patterns, where higher-core models saw lower adoption rates, these upcoming high-end processors may face similar market dynamics. Of course, these sales figures are only a part of the story as Mindfactory is only a single retailer across a diverse set of sellers, so the complete market picture is unknown to anyone but AMD. PC upgrade cycles are a common bottleneck in new CPU sales, especially as consumers don't tend to upgrade their PCs every year with new CPUs and platforms. We have to wait and see how the market adapts to new X3D SKUs, and if the Zen 5 X3D CPUs can reach the previous generation fame among consumers.
56 Comments on AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU Sales Surpass Entire Ryzen 9000 Series at German Retailer
Even the bears are sleeping, but not the polar bears :rolleyes: 14.39 Pesos
Did not even think about Canadian Dollars :D :toast:
If you do productivity work, then yes, it's a much better buy, but if you game, the 9600x or 9800X3D are better buy.
I put buying a new computer, new tablet, new laptop, new minipc in the same category as upgrading.
I had for 11 month a 6 gen core intel notebook, than for a few weeks a 8 gen intel notebook. Those are barely usable for even windows updates. I saw the "quality" from dell at work in the formfactor for notebook. Sluggish slow.
Processors will limit the gaming experience - even in the middle field at some point. That's up to definition.
the usual nvidia / intel fanboy will hardly buy amd. Because there is the wrong name in the uefi. ... with bad compiler support. The compiler optimisation for amd processor is lacking for the past years.
--
I'm not sure if certain regions will get more processors. Very hard to make a fact check as there are no public sold numbers for each area available.
i've been sitting on my AM5 board for a month now unable to get a 9800X3D since its out of stock everywhere in Canada.
Where are you seeing it for $1450 CAD?
I've seen people trying to resell on kijii for $900-$950
is that from ebay?
It is the only Amazon.ca listing
7950x, 9900x, 9700x all the same or cheaper than 9800x3d and will be near identical at 1440p+ and if you don't have a 4090 as well. Then there's Intel options as well.
People just being caught up in the hype for 9800x3d, sure if you use DLSS ultra performance and render your games at 720p, resolution that was mainstream 20 years ago, upscaled it'll do a job for you.
I think I will just wait for local stock. Currently on a 5800X3D so should be able to hold me over for another month or two :)
Non of my strategy games do run better at all and some even showed a negative performance.
Sure for modern games you might see a small improvement but non of my games show a performance gain at all, some even run even worse.
I used for a few weeks the cpu from a friend because he wanted to proof it, because he thought that what i say could not be true and would show a significant better gameplay.
Well lol several games did not start at all and most did not show any improvements and the rest ran even worse with this cpu now let me be clear i never run with boosted clocks as it often ends in crashing and am too lazy to send a cpu back to get another one xD
LoL so i had to send several proof video's towards his bungalow where he is living for the winter sport.
Later he tried to find any excuse to ESCAPE that he had to say "your right again :D"
Anyway he did admit as the video's where clear, lets hope the next year release of AMD it's new gpu will be a nice upgrade for me.
Cpu wise there is no new AMD cpu anytime soon to spend some money on
The hardware is far too slow for windows 10 pro = Lenovo T460, too slow Windows 11 pro = Lenovo T480 + 16GiB RAM + dedicated nvidia gpu. Bare minimum cpu for windows 11 pro according to the cpu list from microsoft. I really wonder what else I should I have done to maintain them? I'm glad I got rid of both. T480 sold a few weeks ago.
I think some 10 year old desktop computers will be much faster as a lenovo t460. So when claiming you are using 10 year old computer, please than give the hole part list.
(random picked 10 year old processor www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/82931/intel-core-i75930k-processor-15m-cache-up-to-3-70-ghz/specifications.html - i think that will be faster as a 2 core low power notebook from T460)
--
#45
9800X3d vs 7800X3d. I'm not sure if there will be many differences. Maybe in gnu linux when you use a distro like gentoo linux when you compile stuff.
That is why I hope that this CPU puts pricing pressure on the rest of the stack. I would love to pay less for my 9900X3D when it launches. The gulf between the 7800X3D and 7900X3D was $150 and the 7950X3D was $400 more. Those are Canadian Dollars. As you can see it is already more expensive than the most expensive GPU from AMD from 3rd party sellers. We are falling further down the rabbit hole but I want the 9900X3D to be maligned again as there was a point last summer where that chip (7900x3D) was a ridiculous $343 Canadian on a flash sale. Of course they sold every single one and funnily enough the 7900X3D is more expensive right now than when I bought mine at launch.
If you think CPU performance does not matter, get yourself a copy of City Skylines 2 and get the population above 500,000. Even 1440P will bring your CPU to it's knees and more cores matter. I have several machines and the 5950X just does not have the clock speed but 16 cores is insane meanwhile the 5600X is well slower. The craziest thing is that the 5900X was the best performing after my X3D. There is something about 6 core CCDs being cooler than 8 core just by design. That effetcs the thermals in ways that you would have to own one and use long term to understand. I mean you can put a $35 Air cooler on a 5900X that you would not even put near a 5950X. Thankfully Thermalright has things like P.A. for $45 Canadian dollars to make the argument moot. There is no such thing as significant anymore. We just expect 30% like any CPU has actually ever achieved that from generation to generation. The 2000 chips were faster than 1000 but 3000 chips were plain fast. When 5000 came though it was not as significant. Of course you could also buy killer MBs like the B550 Xe or the Unify and Ace Line up from MSI. 7000 is about 20% faster than 5000 at the extreme. Significant is transistor count and density increases but performance for me has reached a plateau in the CPU space. 5.7 GHz is on the 7000X3D Dual CCD chips and everyone is gushing because the 9800X3D does 5.2. Clock speed still matters. I got a 8600G for testing (and playing older Games) and that chip is surprisingly fast, it also blows away the 5600G that I was using. That is because it has a much faster IGPU though and not just 5 GHz support with Insane Memory support. 5 GHz is still crazy fast. I have a LM790 as my boot with a cheap 2TB SSD for storage.
What you say is true, but I feel for GPU as well. I might be getting old, but oftentimes I see improvement when looking at new games with high-end hardware only when someone tells me specifically what to look for. On first glance could be 7 years old or was released yesterday...
My hope is that AMD's APU will continue improving, in which case I'll get rid of the GPU altogether. It's just so much more efficient, power-wise...