Thursday, January 9th 2025

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition Hands On, Taken Apart

At the 2025 International CES, we went hands on with the new NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition "Blackwell" graphics card. This thing is huge—longer and taller than the RTX 4090 FE, and yet just 2 slots thick. This is because NVIDIA's designers have figured out that the heat dissipation area of the heatsink lost to thinning the card can be recovered by stretching it in other directions. The card retains the essential aesthetic of Founders Edition cards from the past two generations going back to the RTX 30-series, but changes the concept of the dual-axial flow-through.

While past generations used an intake fan on one side, blowing onto the PCB, and another fan at the tail end of the backplate pull air through the heatsink and out the back, the RTX 5090 FE has two large fans, both of which blow cold air through the heatsink, and out the back of the card. The PCB is located in the center of the card, and relies on a set of breakout PCBs for host interface and display outputs.
The biggest component on the PCB, which takes up nearly 1/3 of its board area, is the "GB202" GPU on which the RTX 5090 is based. The GPU has a gigantic pin-count not just for its power needs, but its 512-bit GDDR7 memory interface. At one corner of the PCB, which sticks out from the top of the cooler, is the card's 12V2x6 power input, which is rated for 600 W (we don't know the TGP of the RTX 5090 yet).

The card uses a VRM solution with 19 phases for the VGPU, and 8 phases for the memory. Much like an AI GPU board, NVIDIA resorted to high-density PCB engineering, not wasting any space on either sides of the PCB. The chokes and DRMOS (made by MPS) are on the obverse side, surrounding the GPU on three sides; and the capacitors are on the reverse side.

The reverse side of the PCB has connectors that lead to its two breakout components. The first one connects to a PCB with the PCI-Express 5.0 x16 gold fingers. The other connector leads to the display I/O breakout. Both connections are made using thin ribbon cables like the ones you find in laptops, and routed along the edges of the cooler, so as not to impede airflow.
Add your own comment

93 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition Hands On, Taken Apart

#76
Vayra86
Impressive. Now lets see it dissipate all those watts, we have seen various FEs that throttled. I am not saying this one will and if it indeed wont thats an engineering marvel.

I think they moved towards the wind tunnel idea of rack mounted cooling here. Just force air through. I hope it wont also have a similar noise signature :)
Posted on Reply
#77
jesdals
I would love this card if it wasnt for the price
Posted on Reply
#78
TheDeeGee
Chomiq

Skip to thermal testing and notice the difference in comparison to 4090 FE. Then you'll probably understand why they designed 5090 they way they did.
Insane thermals on that prototype, holy moses!
Posted on Reply
#79
The Terrible Puddle
Just buy a partner card if you want a waterblock for a convential PCB.
I am sure there will be lots of waterblocks for something like Asus cards.
Posted on Reply
#80
GhostRyder
freeagentWith precision measuring tools, CAD software, and CNC, it really wont be that difficult..
I don't disagree, I mostly meant though in respect to the fact the display outputs are on a separate piece as I figure it will have to incorporate that into the design and become the structure of the whole GPU.
Posted on Reply
#81
uplink777
Hmm, more like 5090 CE = Cripple Edition
Posted on Reply
#82
TokyoQuaSaR
Dr. DroQuite the contrary, a small PCB is desirable and an engineering feat that took many many years to achieve. One this small then is a marvel of technology. Smaller PCBs mean better signal integrity with as little loss as possible. So ridiculous isn't exactly the word I would use, it's closer to "remarkable"
Exactly my thoughts.
GigaherzWell I wouldnt complain at least. And be honest, it wouldnt be a bad card. To me the founders edition was always the "reference" design with the cheapest pcb that everyone uses for waterblocks because it has the highest compatibility.

But go on, celebrate this developement further. F the enthousiasts!
The 7090 is just going to be a Geforce now Streaming device then. But I guess people will love it because it looks sleek. You will own nothing and be happy.
The objective is to make a nice cooling solution, and I do think it's an awesome way to do it. The other way would be water cooling, but as you say the FE is supposed to be cheaper than that.
Posted on Reply
#83
londiste
rv8000The flow through design doesn’t help THAT much, it’s in the realm of 5c. Just the overall mass loss of heatsink is questionable. I have a feeling FE will either run well below 575w in stock/normal conditions, or AIB cards will really be able to stretch their legs under water.
But 5C is quite significant in this context, no?
MxPhenom 216Sure, though for the breakaway boards im not so sure ribbon cables are exactly "clean"
I do have some concerns about how well or reliably the ribbon cables and connectors work with PCIe5 or some faster display outputs but in context of the main PCB itself these ribbon cables might be a blessing in disguise. Instead of routing the tricky traces to the PCIe fingers or display outputs at the edge of PCB somewhere these are taken off the PCB in some convenient point where they have as little effect as possible on everything else.
Posted on Reply
#84
rv8000
londisteBut 5C is quite significant in this context, no?

I do have some concerns about how well or reliably the ribbon cables and connectors work with PCIe5 or some faster display outputs but in context of the main PCB itself these ribbon cables might be a blessing in disguise. Instead of routing the tricky traces to the PCIe fingers or display outputs at the edge of PCB somewhere these are taken off the PCB in some convenient point where they have as little effect as possible on everything else.
Yes, but at the same time the overall mass loss of heatsink is probably going to have a much larger impact, we also don’t know if a second flow through area will give the same amount of benefit; we didn’t even get a good look at the bare cooler, daughter boards, and connectors.

Their FE coolers do a pretty good job but smaller cooler + significantly higher tdp/tgp isn’t a recipe for cooler or the same temps. Nvidia and AIBs have already stretched air cooling to it’s limits, at some point you’re just not going to overcome science when adding another 100-150w.
Posted on Reply
#85
TheinsanegamerN
DavenAt this point, we just need a socket on the motherboard for the GPU.
As neat as that is, the limitations would become immediately apparent, sinc eGPu generations are pushing boundaries and I cannot imagine the memory issues. There's a reasont he memory chips are crammed so close to the GPU, and memory standards change so frequently, that socketing the GPU would accomplish nothing for longevity.
DavenThree separate PCBs connected by ribbon cables is pushing the limits of keeping the current paradigm and could lead to all sorts of problems if the cables become disconnected.
Cables are not an issue. If they become a problem, re attatch them. There will likely be a dollop of hot glue on them to prevent them from moving anyway.
Posted on Reply
#86
londiste
rv8000Yes, but at the same time the overall mass loss of heatsink is probably going to have a much larger impact, we also don’t know if a second flow through area will give the same amount of benefit; we didn’t even get a good look at the bare cooler, daughter boards, and connectors.

Their FE coolers do a pretty good job but smaller cooler + significantly higher tdp/tgp isn’t a recipe for cooler or the same temps. Nvidia and AIBs have already stretched air cooling to it’s limits, at some point you’re just not going to overcome science when adding another 100-150w.
Heatsink mass is not really that big of a factor. Radiators-heatsinks are all about area and temperature difference. Flow should be positive for the temperature delta.
I guess we will see what the cooler itself actually looks like compared to 4090 one but with less PCB in the way and the claim of 5090 being slightly longer and wider the area might even be bigger.
Posted on Reply
#87
rv8000
londisteHeatsink mass is not really that big of a factor. Radiators-heatsinks are all about area and temperature difference. Flow should be positive for the temperature delta.
I guess we will see what the cooler itself actually looks like compared to 4090 one but with less PCB in the way and the claim of 5090 being slightly longer and wider the area might even be bigger.
If you’re reducing the mass via cutting the height of fins (thickness of the card), you are reducing the surface area, that’s what I was getting at (wrong terminology). Coming from the 3+ slot design of the 4090 fe to the 2slot, there are going to be minimal surface area differences that are probably in favor of the 4090 fe cooler. Add 100w+ or more and that’s not an ideal recipe.

Will be neat to see performance differences on water.
Posted on Reply
#88
Suspecto
I don't think I've seen worse design than this, remind me of Apple products, everything is cramped together and exposed to heat and if something breaks or shorts, explodes, it is gg.

Shit product for the premium price.
Posted on Reply
#89
Darmok N Jalad
Rather than seeing the design as a negative, it actually lends itself better to repairability. If the ports are on a daughter card, that means they could more easily be swapped out in the event of a failure. Back to the 2013 Mac Pro, it, too, uses ribbon cabled attached to multiple cards. I own one made back in 2014 at the latest, and if anything those connections are hard to break free. If it’s designed well, it should be a good product.
Posted on Reply
#90
Lycanwolfen
I'll wait till I see real world review, tear down and other stuff.
Posted on Reply
#91
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
freeagentImagine what they have or will have in the wild shortly..
We already do. We fit racks full of them. Here is Blackwell specifically B200. This is a servethehome pic. Our HGX boards do 8 per tray and are black.




They looks integrated, but they arent. They are screwed down. and a massive heatsink is put them and screwed in again. The HGX board itself just contains retimers and the primary power delivery circuitry basically taking say a 8pin molex and running it through the copper layer to the GPU socket. All the power delivery, vram and GPU core are on those cards you see. They fit in the palm of my hand. Previous architectures and future architectures also come in similar formfactors using gen 2 HGX boards etc.

Its just now coming to the consumer space, but it has been in this similar form factor for years.
Posted on Reply
#92
freeagent
Solaris17We already do. We fit racks full of them. Here is Blackwell specifically B200. This is a servethehome pic. Our HGX boards do 8 per tray and are black.




They looks integrated, but they arent. They are screwed down. and a massive heatsink is put them and screwed in again. The HGX board itself just contains retimers and the primary power delivery circuitry basically taking say a 8pin molex and running it through the copper layer to the GPU socket. All the power delivery, vram and GPU core are on those cards you see. They fit in the palm of my hand. Previous architectures and future architectures also come in similar formfactors using gen 2 HGX boards etc.

Its just now coming to the consumer space, but it has been in this similar form factor for years.
You are a lucky fellow :)
Posted on Reply
#93
igormp
Solaris17We already do. We fit racks full of them. Here is Blackwell specifically B200. This is a servethehome pic. Our HGX boards do 8 per tray and are black.




They looks integrated, but they arent. They are screwed down. and a massive heatsink is put them and screwed in again. The HGX board itself just contains retimers and the primary power delivery circuitry basically taking say a 8pin molex and running it through the copper layer to the GPU socket. All the power delivery, vram and GPU core are on those cards you see. They fit in the palm of my hand. Previous architectures and future architectures also come in similar formfactors using gen 2 HGX boards etc.

Its just now coming to the consumer space, but it has been in this similar form factor for years.
Just to make it clear for others, that's an SXM socket, Nvidia has been using those for their highest end x100 GPUs for quite some time (think P100, V100, A100, H200, etc etc). Easy way to have nvlink and power delivery without a cabling mess.
freeagentYou are a lucky fellow :)
I guess that's one of the perks of working in a big tech lol
The company I work for is barely starting to work on managing our own stack instead of using managed solutions, hopefully one day having our stuff on-prem will make enough sense so I can toy with those things as well haha
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 10th, 2025 01:40 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts