Saturday, February 15th 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7be4e/7be4e714a5268121fd78f9624dbf006ffdfea27f" alt="AMD"
AMD Radeon RX 9070 and 9070 XT Listed On Amazon - One Buyer Snags a Unit
We live in crazy times, that's for sure. We have already witnessed a plethora of listings for AMD's RX 9070 and RX 9070 XT GPUs - both set to hit shelves early next month - indicating a decent value proposition compared to NVIDIA's RTX 5070 family, if the leaks and rumors are anything to go by. More recently, as spotted by @momomo_us, Amazon briefly listed a bunch of RX 9070 and 9070 XT cards from XFX. The pricing details are as follows:
Sources:
VideoCardz, VideoCardz
- XFX Swift AMD Radeon RX 9070 OC - $649.99
- XFX Swift AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT - $749.99
- XFX Quicksilver AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT - $769.99
- XFX Mercury AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT OC - $819.99
- XFX Mercury AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT OC Magnetic Air Edition - $849.99
242 Comments on AMD Radeon RX 9070 and 9070 XT Listed On Amazon - One Buyer Snags a Unit
that sellers still have leftovers of 7800 and 7900, which they would like to sell at current prices of course,
without additional discounts due to the emergence of RDNA4.
Also don't forget about VAT in countries - for example, the cheapest Arc B580 card doesn't cost $249,www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/arc-b580.c4244
it costs 309 euros - that's not even 20% more, but 24%.
geizhals.de/intel-arc-b580-limited-edition-31p06hb0ba-a3365436.html?hloc=at&hloc=de
p.s. I'd like to see less high prices for 9070 too, but it's not worth not considering real factors.
+ Yes, i forgot to add, that we haven't seen prices for reference models yet.
They may be lower, and cooler quality is yet to be evaluated.
:toast:
For those in the US, that sucks, but for the much larger and more significant non-US market, we're talking about GPUs built by a Taiwanese foundry on behalf of a US firm, then sold to a Taiwanese AIB like Asus/Gigabyte/MSI/Sapphire/Zotac etc. Do Trump tariffs have any effect on those AIBs selling to countries that aren't the US?
Now every single source "knows" what the pricing is going to be, and none of them agree. Some use the amazon leak. Some assume "what gamers want." That's usually before they throw out a number that's surprisingly low, considering what Nvidia has already firmed up with the 5070. I'm just sitting here, and considering that AMD has created a FUD storm so dense that no matter what they release it'll be wrong, all of the pundits will be right no matter what they actually said, and all of this is because they decided to pull out the release to compete with Nvidia. A company who basically doesn't compete because they don't have to.
Is it sad to ask for Intel to step up, and maybe do something with Battlemage?
The biggest enemy by far for gpu buyers is AI and mining when it's profitable also nvidia itself when artificially producing small amount of gpus.
Also Samsung should compete with TSMC to reduce prices. I don't like when TSMC is on top for a long time.
To me even RX 9070 XT 32GB version is kinda absurd product.
That would put B770 with performance between 7700 XT and 4070, and for $350 that would be nice. 7700XT was around $350 for a brief time but cheapest is in the low $400s now, mostly $450+.
So if AMD were selling these for $580 to them and they set a MSRP of $650 then that is barely 10% wiggle room for them. if they were selling them for say $450 and they set an msrp of $550 then that is $100 for them.
I think AMD would like to price these really low, as low as they can without cutting into their profits, but I also think if they don't price them as low as possible they are going to lose even more marketshare. People are just going to skip this generation as a whole if their 9070XT is $750, that is way too much. I mean even if its say 10% faster than the 5070ti, its just not enough.
I don't know, its either way too fast, faster than we are all imagining, they have some insane gains over the previous generation, to the point where maybe the 5070XT competes with the 5080, who knows. If that is the case then I can see how $750 would make sense, but I just can't see it being that fast, that would mean 20% faster than the 5070ti, I just don't see that!
But ..
Having Radeon cards in the past with double VRAM compared to the reference design isn't that rare after all.
17 x 2=34gb 7900 xtx 24 gb =12 slot memory gaming
www.amd.com/es/products/graphics/radeon-for-creators.html
www.amd.com/es/products/graphics/workstations/radeon-pro/w7900.html =48gb
gpu radeon Pro serie9000 gddr7 = 64gb next step
gpu gaming radeon XTX 32 gb ....yes gddr7
Anyways I am waiting for official announcement and reviews before making decision. Also for my applications so far Helicon hasnt updated the numbers so have to wait even longer.
My conclusion? people calling them AMD/Nvidia Unboxed are actually far more biased than the channel itself is.
I have my own gripes with them of course, like their inconsistent test methodology from video to video, and coming up with content ideas and thus specific testing methodology that is guaranteed to prove whatever point they want to make on the day. It's easy to have the result be what you want when you construct the test specifically to get the result you want. Steve also lets himself respond to trolls and take the rage bait, and goes on lengthy "I told you so's" etc, I find his commentary a bit grating for that reason. And more....
But overall just being clearly biased for or against a brand? Nah, they make hit pieces on anyone that deserves it for what they're doing at the time. I'm sure you or anyone could write a lengthy reply to this with examples and be like see! but again, I've seen that done for both uhhh "sides"
It could also be the same situation as with Nvidia where the AIBs are charging a 40-60% for what amounts to a custom cooler and a little overclocking.
It sucks all around. I'd really hate to be in the market for a GPU in 2025.