Monday, February 24th 2025

AMD Radeon RX 9070 and 9070 XT Official Performance Metrics Leaked, +42% 4K Performance Over Radeon RX 7900 GRE

AMD's internal benchmarks of its upcoming RDNA 4-based RX 9070 series graphics cards have been leaked, thanks to VideoCardz. The flagship RX 9070 XT delivers up to 42% better performance than the Radeon RX 7900 GRE at 4K resolution across a test suite of over 30 games, with the standard RX 9070 showing a 21% improvement in the same scenario. The performance data, encompassing raster and ray-traced titles at ultra settings, positions the RX 9070 series as a direct competitor to NVIDIA's RTX 4080 and RTX 5070 Ti. Notably, AMD's testing methodology focused on native rendering and ray tracing capabilities rather than upscaling technologies like FSR. The RX 9070 XT demonstrated large gains at 4K resolution, achieving a 51% performance uplift compared to the two-generations older RX 6900 XT. Meanwhile, the base RX 9070 model showed a 38% improvement over the RX 6800 XT at 4K with maximum settings enabled.

While AMD confirms its new cards are designed to compete with NVIDIA's RTX 50 series, specific comparative benchmarks against the RTX 5070 Ti were absent from the presentation. AMD acknowledges it has yet to acquire the competitor's hardware for testing. The company is expected to provide a comprehensive performance overview, potentially including additional GPU comparisons, during its official announcement on February 28. Both RX 9070 series cards will feature 16 GB of VRAM, matching the memory configuration of the RX 7900 GRE used as a primary comparison point. By the official launch date, AMD will have time to push final driver tweaks for optimal performance. Nonetheless, more information will surface as we near the official release date.
Source: VideoCardz
Add your own comment

191 Comments on AMD Radeon RX 9070 and 9070 XT Official Performance Metrics Leaked, +42% 4K Performance Over Radeon RX 7900 GRE

#176
Sir Beregond
JustBenchingAt 649$ their marketshare will keep shrinking. 549$ is good!
I agree. The beancounters at AMD I am sure feel like $649 is "good", but I don't think that would be nearly aggressive enough to shake up the market and win back marketshare.

They really need to treat this like Zen - Zen 2 where they were super aggressive in the space to claw back marketshare. It worked.

EDIT: Anyone remember the 4850 and 4870 during the 200-series from Nvidia? $199 and $299 cards respectively smacking down the $649 GTX 280 and $449 GTX 260. The difference between back then and now is people are actually not that happy with Nvidia these days. It's really a prime opportunity to do this again and win back a portion of the market.
Posted on Reply
#177
kapone32
Sir BeregondI agree. The beancounters at AMD I am sure feel like $649 is "good", but I don't think that would be nearly aggressive enough to shake up the market and win back marketshare.

They really need to treat this like Zen - Zen 2 where they were super aggressive in the space to claw back marketshare. It worked.

EDIT: Anyone remember the 4850 and 4870 during the 200-series from Nvidia? $199 and $299 cards respectively smacking down the $649 GTX 280 and $449 GTX 260. The difference between back then and now is people are actually not that happy with Nvidia these days. It's really a prime opportunity to do this again and win back a portion of the market.
Yes but in those days YT did not exist. I am not saying that it alone has people using excuses for every single Nvidia problem. Then there are things on TPU like a user asking about an AMD card and have a staff member respond with Nvidia.
Posted on Reply
#178
dragontamer5788
Sir BeregondThey really need to treat this like Zen - Zen 2 where they were super aggressive in the space to claw back marketshare. It worked.
You know what worked? Fighting Intel when Intel couldn't put up decent competition.

Fighting NVidia is a different story. NVidia is almost entirely focused on GPUs (albeit on AI / Datacenter these days, but still close enough to video games to benefit).

Just dropping prices without acknowledging the long-term damage to AMD's brand is a bad idea. You can't just keep dropping prices each time NVidia raises them. If people aren't willing to jump for a nearly equivalent card at -$50 or -$100, then its not worth chasing them to -$150 or -$200.

Especially when NVidia in practice is +$200 in practice due to scalpers. So there's multiple-hundreds of dollars difference between NVidia cards and their equivalent AMD card as it is.
Posted on Reply
#179
Sir Beregond
dragontamer5788You know what worked? Fighting Intel when Intel couldn't put up decent competition.

Fighting NVidia is a different story. NVidia is almost entirely focused on GPUs (albeit on AI / Datacenter these days, but still close enough to video games to benefit).

Just dropping prices without acknowledging the long-term damage to AMD's brand is a bad idea. You can't just keep dropping prices each time NVidia raises them. If people aren't willing to jump for a nearly equivalent card at -$50 or -$100, then its not worth chasing them to -$150 or -$200.

Especially when NVidia in practice is +$200 in practice due to scalpers. So there's multiple-hundreds of dollars difference between NVidia cards and their equivalent AMD card as it is.
Then what the hell is even AMD's long term game here. That strategy didn't win them any market last gen. So if the game is that they are content to sell to their little niche of fans, then sure. If they are actually telling the truth about wanting to take back marketshare, the market has made it clear that that's not good enough.
Posted on Reply
#180
medi01
JustBenchingAt 649$ their marketshare will keep shrinking. 549$ is good!
OEMs control market share (and that is how Intel's share is raising), DIY is just 16% of the market.

Also, no way in hell AMD would undercut its own card, the 7900XTX by nearly 50%, when the cheapest 5070Ti that one can get starts at 1200+ Euro.
Posted on Reply
#181
kerberos_20
Bomby569so 9070 xt on par with the 5070ti/7090xtx and the 9070 on par with the 7900xt/3090ti

now if you price them like those cards expect market share going to zero, so you're move AMD. I would say 650 for the xt and 550 for the non xt (probably too much to compete with the 5070 non ti) to have any chance of making any meaningful sales.

Not sure what they were doing as RT performance seems incredibly disappointing, didn't they promised the opposite?
theres no competition, nvidia doesnt have stock, people will grab whats available
Posted on Reply
#182
TheGeekn°72
medi01OEMs control market share (and that is how Intel's share is raising), DIY is just 16% of the market.

Also, no way in hell AMD would undercut its own card, the 7900XTX by nearly 50%, when the cheapest 5070Ti that one can get starts at 1200+ Euro.
There is very little stock of the XTX remaining though and I think AMD would prefer to eat the loss on the remaining XTXes than not sell RDNA4
Posted on Reply
#183
Heiro78
JustBenchingNothing equals gameplay but this is a thread about GPUs, you do not buy new GPUs to have better gameplay, you buy them for the graphics, full stop.
I meant visual quality during gameplay versus visuals during CGI. I highly doubt you misunderstood my meaning and instead built a strawman argument
Posted on Reply
#184
piffdaddy
DavenThat's strange. What's an RT game? I usually like to play games with big boss fights, fast car chases, awesome music during high action scenes, lots of loot, fun puzzles to solve and great storylines. I hate the fact that Nvidia has convinced its customers that GPU features are more important than fun. Why not play fun games over the next three years? Isn't that the point?
I get what you're saying but we've already seen a few games release now where ray tracing isn't an option even at low settings. The metal Gear remake coming out soon also has Ray tracing as a prerequisite so your gpu better be able to handle it because it's fast going to become the norm and not the exception. It's time to finally embrace it because it's what's happening
Posted on Reply
#185
oddrobert
Bomby569so 9070 xt on par with the 5070ti/7090xtx and the 9070 on par with the 7900xt/3090ti

now if you price them like those cards expect market share going to zero, so you're move AMD. I would say 650 for the xt and 550 for the non xt (probably too much to compete with the 5070 non ti) to have any chance of making any meaningful sales.

Not sure what they were doing as RT performance seems incredibly disappointing, didn't they promised the opposite?
I don't know, but 16 GB,50 flops in good price is something what games wish for.
Even better if it's not from greedvidia.
Posted on Reply
#186
Am*
oddrobertI already sold my greedvidia and wait for AMD to deliver, if prices wont come down I will make myself scarce and sell all gaming things i got and move on and read books instead.
Just hate that pc market and N word company especially.
250$ b580 is more like 325Euro over here and it's best value option. I am done with it.
How long it will take for <400GPB to something similar to 7800xt?
I think it will take at least another 6 mounts.
For now for around 400gbp you can get 7700xt 12gb which is okish.
Till end of year, 7800xt performance 16gb hope to be well below 400gbp.

I mean, I already set my budget and now w8 for performance for meat it.
Instead, to fall for upsell craze, time will tell but need to nosider quiting all that crazines.
The best deal on the 7800 XT was September last year. I got mine for £400 brand new with 4 free games (Warhammer Space Marine 2, Unknown 9 Awakening, Avatar and Lies of P). That deal made the 7800 XT cheaper than the 7700 XT after selling the games (£300). Glad I didn't bother waiting for this gen of GPUs before building my rig -- as I don't think this gen will offer anything anywhere near as crazy value for money from Nvidia or AMD.

Keep an eye on eBay -- there are occasionally discount codes that come up on 7800 XTs that bring their price down to £385 or so.
Posted on Reply
#187
medi01
piffdaddyRay tracing as a prerequisite so...because it's fast going to become the norm
7th year into RT gimmick that amazing technology is "fast going to" do something. :D
Posted on Reply
#188
Heiro78
katziI really wish they still included WoW FPS numbers, but I also understand how hard that would be to get accurate lol. Blizzard need to come up with a benchmarking tool.
If ya can find one you trust, there's plenty of youtubers who do these kinds of specific benchmarks. It would be lovely for TPU but I see this game as niche for benchmarking
Posted on Reply
#189
lexluthermiester
So by that chart, the RTRT perf has really very much improved for both price points.
Posted on Reply
#190
mxthunder
Sir BeregondI agree. The beancounters at AMD I am sure feel like $649 is "good", but I don't think that would be nearly aggressive enough to shake up the market and win back marketshare.

They really need to treat this like Zen - Zen 2 where they were super aggressive in the space to claw back marketshare. It worked.

EDIT: Anyone remember the 4850 and 4870 during the 200-series from Nvidia? $199 and $299 cards respectively smacking down the $649 GTX 280 and $449 GTX 260. The difference between back then and now is people are actually not that happy with Nvidia these days. It's really a prime opportunity to do this again and win back a portion of the market.
Those were good days. I got wrapped up in that excitement and actually jumped ship from Nvidia (GTX260 at the time) to ATi for 4890 > 4890 CF > 5870. Then back to nvidia
Posted on Reply
#191
Ozzer
Bomby569i doubt both cards will be price similar to the GRE, no one would buy the non xt :kookoo:
That makes no sense
...and I was right ahahah
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Mar 1st, 2025 00:16 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts